Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Rare Event Classification with Weighted Logistic Regression for Identifying Repeating Fast Radio Bursts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.17474 v1 pith:ZP3RTQ5W submitted 2024-10-22 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IMstat.AP

Rare Event Classification with Weighted Logistic Regression for Identifying Repeating Fast Radio Bursts

classification astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IMstat.AP
keywords logisticregressionrepeatingsourcesclassificationproportionrepeatersbursts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

An important task in the study of fast radio bursts (FRBs) remains the automatic classification of repeating and non-repeating sources based on their morphological properties. We propose a statistical model that considers a modified logistic regression to classify FRB sources. The classical logistic regression model is modified to accommodate the small proportion of repeaters in the data, a feature that is likely due to the sampling procedure and duration and is not a characteristic of the population of FRB sources. The weighted logistic regression hinges on the choice of a tuning parameter that represents the true proportion $\tau$ of repeating FRB sources in the entire population. The proposed method has a sound statistical foundation, direct interpretability, and operates with only 5 parameters, enabling quicker retraining with added data. Using the CHIME/FRB Collaboration sample of repeating and non-repeating FRBs and numerical experiments, we achieve a classification accuracy for repeaters of nearly 75\% or higher when $\tau$ is set in the range of $50$ to $60$\%. This implies a tentative high proportion of repeaters, which is surprising, but is also in agreement with recent estimates of $\tau$ that are obtained using other methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.