Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Enhancing IR-based Fault Localization using Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.03754 v1 pith:ZPYX2U4B submitted 2024-12-04 cs.SE

Enhancing IR-based Fault Localization using Large Language Models

classification cs.SE
keywords queryapproachirfllanguagetechniquesfaultfilesinformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Information Retrieval-based Fault Localization (IRFL) techniques aim to identify source files containing the root causes of reported failures. While existing techniques excel in ranking source files, challenges persist in bug report analysis and query construction, leading to potential information loss. Leveraging large language models like GPT-4, this paper enhances IRFL by categorizing bug reports based on programming entities, stack traces, and natural language text. Tailored query strategies, the initial step in our approach (LLmiRQ), are applied to each category. To address inaccuracies in queries, we introduce a user and conversational-based query reformulation approach, termed LLmiRQ+. Additionally, to further enhance query utilization, we implement a learning-to-rank model that leverages key features such as class name match score and call graph score. This approach significantly improves the relevance and accuracy of queries. Evaluation on 46 projects with 6,340 bug reports yields an MRR of 0.6770 and MAP of 0.5118, surpassing seven state-of-the-art IRFL techniques, showcasing superior performance.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Semantic Drift in Bug Resolution: How Behavioral Signals Propagate from Reports to Tests and Patches

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Behavioral signals in bug reports propagate only partially into tests and fixes; alignment is measurable but representation-dependent, and LLM judges are systematically optimistic versus human ratings.

  2. BLAgent: Agentic RAG for File-Level Bug Localization

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    BLAgent achieves over 78% Top-1 accuracy on SWE-bench Lite for file-level bug localization using agentic RAG, at 18x lower cost than baselines, and boosts end-to-end APR success by over 20%.

  3. BLAgent: Agentic RAG for File-Level Bug Localization

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    BLAgent achieves over 78% top-1 file-level bug localization accuracy on SWE-bench-Lite with open-source models and over 86% with closed-source models while being over 18x cheaper than the strongest baseline.