Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

XplainLLM: A Knowledge-Augmented Dataset for Reliable Grounded Explanations in LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.08614 v2 pith:ZQEZJKPM submitted 2023-11-15 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords xplainllmexplanationsllmsdatasetgroundedreasoningbehaviordebugger-scores
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in natural language tasks, yet understanding their reasoning processes remains a significant challenge. We address this by introducing XplainLLM, a dataset accompanying an explanation framework designed to enhance LLM transparency and reliability. Our dataset comprises 24,204 instances where each instance interprets the LLM's reasoning behavior using knowledge graphs (KGs) and graph attention networks (GAT), and includes explanations of LLMs such as the decoder-only Llama-3 and the encoder-only RoBERTa. XplainLLM also features a framework for generating grounded explanations and the debugger-scores for multidimensional quality analysis. Our explanations include why-choose and why-not-choose components, reason-elements, and debugger-scores that collectively illuminate the LLM's reasoning behavior. Our evaluations demonstrate XplainLLM's potential to reduce hallucinations and improve grounded explanation generation in LLMs. XplainLLM is a resource for researchers and practitioners to build trust and verify the reliability of LLM outputs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Engaging with AI: How Interface Design Shapes Human-AI Collaboration in High-Stakes Decision-Making

    cs.HC 2025-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a controlled comparison, AI confidence levels and text explanations improved human-AI decision accuracy, while reflective questions and human feedback increased effort and reduced trust.

Pith tools