REVIEW 2 cited by
Distribution Density, Tails, and Outliers in Machine Learning: Metrics and Applications
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We develop techniques to quantify the degree to which a given (training or testing) example is an outlier in the underlying distribution. We evaluate five methods to score examples in a dataset by how well-represented the examples are, for different plausible definitions of "well-represented", and apply these to four common datasets: MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10, and ImageNet. Despite being independent approaches, we find all five are highly correlated, suggesting that the notion of being well-represented can be quantified. Among other uses, we find these methods can be combined to identify (a) prototypical examples (that match human expectations); (b) memorized training examples; and, (c) uncommon submodes of the dataset. Further, we show how we can utilize our metrics to determine an improved ordering for curriculum learning, and impact adversarial robustness. We release all metric values on training and test sets we studied.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Benchmarking Unlearning for Vision Transformers
CNN-derived unlearning methods largely transfer to Vision Transformers: Fine-tune works best on ViT, NegGrad+ on Swin, while SalUn fails privacy-style metrics.
-
FairDropout: Using Example-Tied Dropout to Enhance Generalization of Minority Groups
An example-tied dropout layer that drops per-example memorizing neurons at inference improves worst-group accuracy across five spurious-correlation benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.