REVIEW 1 cited by
Quintessence Unification Models from Non-Abelian Gauge Dynamics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We show that the condensates of a non-abelian gauge group, unified with the standard model gauge groups, can parameterize the present day cosmological constant and play the role of quintessence. The models agree with SN1a and recent CMB analysis. These models have {\it no free} parameters. Even the initial energy density at the unification scale and at the condensation scale are fixed by the number of degrees of freedom of the gauge group (i.e. by $N_c, N_f$). The values of $N_c, N_f$ are determined by imposing gauge coupling unification and the number of models is quite limited. Using Affleck-Dine-Seiberg superpotential one obtains a scalar potential $V=\Lm_c^{4+n}\phi^{-n}$. Models with $2<n<4.27$ or equivalently $2\times 10^{-2} GeV < \Lm_c < 6 \times 10^3 GeV$ do not satisfy the unification constrain. In fact, there are only three models and they have an inverse power potential with $6/11 \leq n \leq 2/3$. Imposing primordial nucleosynthesis bounds the preferred model has $N_c=3, N_f=6$, with $n=2/3$, a condensation scale $\Lm_c=4.2\times 10^{-8} GeV$ and $\wpo=-0.90$ with an average value $\weff=-0.93$. Notice that the tracker solution is not a good approximation since it has $w_{tr}=-\fr{2}{n+2}=-0.75$ for $n=2/3$. We study the evolution of all fields from the unification scale and we calculate the relevant cosmological quantities. We also discuss the supersymmetry breaking mechanism which is relevant for these models.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bound dark energy: Particle origin of dark energy with DESI BAO and DES supernova data
A dark-meson field from a hidden SU(3) force is presented as a parameter-free dark energy model, but the key parameter is actually fitted and the claimed fit improvement is inflated by an arithmetic error.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.