REVIEW 1 cited by
$\lambda$-Regularized A-Optimal Design and its Approximation by $\lambda$-Regularized Proportional Volume Sampling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In this work, we study the $\lambda$-regularized $A$-optimal design problem and introduce the $\lambda$-regularized proportional volume sampling algorithm, generalized from [Nikolov, Singh, and Tantipongpipat, 2019], for this problem with the approximation guarantee that extends upon the previous work. In this problem, we are given vectors $v_1,\ldots,v_n\in\mathbb{R}^d$ in $d$ dimensions, a budget $k\leq n$, and the regularizer parameter $\lambda\geq0$, and the goal is to find a subset $S\subseteq [n]$ of size $k$ that minimizes the trace of $\left(\sum_{i\in S}v_iv_i^\top + \lambda I_d\right)^{-1}$ where $I_d$ is the $d\times d$ identity matrix. The problem is motivated from optimal design in ridge regression, where one tries to minimize the expected squared error of the ridge regression predictor from the true coefficient in the underlying linear model. We introduce $\lambda$-regularized proportional volume sampling and give its polynomial-time implementation to solve this problem. We show its $(1+\frac{\epsilon}{\sqrt{1+\lambda'}})$-approximation for $k=\Omega\left(\frac d\epsilon+\frac{\log 1/\epsilon}{\epsilon^2}\right)$ where $\lambda'$ is proportional to $\lambda$, extending the previous bound in [Nikolov, Singh, and Tantipongpipat, 2019] to the case $\lambda>0$ and obtaining asymptotic optimality as $\lambda\rightarrow \infty$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Strong Formulations and Algorithms for Regularized A-optimal Design
Regularized A-optimal design is NP-hard, and a new convex relaxation dominates previous ones with finite optimality gaps for every k, enabling faster exact and greedy solvers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.