Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

The Strong Gravitational Lens Finding Challenge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1802.03609 v3 pith:ZU7MO2GX submitted 2018-02-10 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COastro-ph.IM

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.COastro-ph.IM
keywords methodswillfindinggravitationallenslensesdataobjects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large scale imaging surveys will increase the number of galaxy-scale strong lensing candidates by maybe three orders of magnitudes beyond the number known today. Finding these rare objects will require picking them out of at least tens of millions of images and deriving scientific results from them will require quantifying the efficiency and bias of any search method. To achieve these objectives automated methods must be developed. Because gravitational lenses are rare objects reducing false positives will be particularly important. We present a description and results of an open gravitational lens finding challenge. Participants were asked to classify 100,000 candidate objects as to whether they were gravitational lenses or not with the goal of developing better automated methods for finding lenses in large data sets. A variety of methods were used including visual inspection, arc and ring finders, support vector machines (SVM) and convolutional neural networks (CNN). We find that many of the methods will be easily fast enough to analyse the anticipated data flow. In test data, several methods are able to identify upwards of half the lenses after applying some thresholds on the lens characteristics such as lensed image brightness, size or contrast with the lens galaxy without making a single false-positive identification. This is significantly better than direct inspection by humans was able to do. (abridged)

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gravitational Lenses in UNIONS and Euclid (GLUE) I: A Search for Strong Gravitational Lenses in UNIONS with Subaru, CFHT, and Pan-STARRS Data

    astro-ph.GA 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A ResNet trained on real lenses found 1,346 new strong lens candidates in the UNIONS survey, with 15 systems confirmed by overlapping galaxy spectra.

  2. Uncertainty-Aware Deep Learning for the Ly$\alpha$ Forest: CNN-Based Absorber Detection and Characterization

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    A sliding-window CNN recovers Lyα absorber locations and Voigt parameters from spectra, reproducing CDDF and b–N relations on mocks and, more weakly, on UVES data.

  3. Strong Lens Discoveries in DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys DR10 with Two Deep Learning Architectures

    astro-ph.CO 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A neural-network ensemble plus human grading yields 811 new strong gravitational lens candidates in DESI Legacy Surveys DR10.

  4. Data challenges as a tool for time-domain astronomy

    astro-ph.IM 2019-08 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A review of time-domain astronomy data challenges, focused on the PLAsTiCC classification challenge and its evaluation metrics.

Pith tools