pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.04661 · v3 · pith:ZUCTHGW2new · submitted 2025-11-06 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.IM

unimpeded: A Public Grid of Nested Sampling Chains for Cosmological Model Comparison and Tension Analysis

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IM
keywords modeltensionlambdaanalysiscomparisoncosmologicaldatasetsunimpeded
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Bayesian inference is central to modern cosmology, yet comprehensive model comparison and tension quantification remain computationally prohibitive for many researchers. To address this, we release $\texttt{unimpeded}$, a publicly available Python library and data repository providing pre-computed nested sampling and MCMC chains. We apply this resource to conduct a systematic analysis across a grid of eight cosmological models, including $\Lambda$CDM and seven extensions, and 39 datasets, including individual probes and their pairwise combinations. Our model comparison reveals that whilst individual datasets show varied preferences for model extensions, the base $\Lambda$CDM model is most frequently preferred in combined analyses, with the general trend suggesting that evidence for new physics is diluted when probes are combined. Using five complementary statistics, we quantify tensions, finding the most significant to be between DES and Planck ($\sigma=3.57\pm0.10$) and SH0ES and Planck ($\sigma=3.27\pm0.10$) within $\Omega_k\Lambda$CDM. We characterise the $S_8$ tension as high-dimensional ($d_G=4.87\pm0.79$) and partially resolvable in certain extended models, whereas the Hubble tension is low-dimensional and persists across the model space. Caution should be exercised when combining datasets in tension. The $\texttt{unimpeded}$ data products, hosted on Zenodo, provide a powerful resource for reproducible cosmological analysis and underscore the robustness of the $\Lambda$CDM model against this comprehensive benchmark compilation.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Negative neutrino mass or negative dark energy?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A sign-switching dark energy model (Λ_s CDM) recovers positive effective neutrino masses (0.055 ± 0.050 eV) consistent with oscillation data, unlike ΛCDM which prefers negative values (-0.075 eV), for DESI DR2 + CMB +...

  2. Cosmological intercept tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Tensions in the supernova intercept a_B at z~0.01 in PantheonPlus and z~0.1 in DES-Y5 point to data systematics or inter-survey inconsistencies rather than new physics, aligning H0 measurements and reducing support fo...

  3. The Bayesian view of DESI DR2 with unimpeded: Evidence and tension in a combined analysis with CMB and supernovae across cosmological models

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0

    Bayesian evidence computation on DESI DR2 plus Planck and supernovae eliminates the frequentist 3.1 sigma preference for w0waCDM over LambdaCDM when using the DES-Dovekie recalibration, yielding ln B = -0.30 favoring ...

  4. A Bayesian Perspective on Evidence for Evolving Dark Energy

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0

    Bayesian evidence favors a constant dark energy model for DESI plus Planck data and shows that apparent support for evolving dark energy with added supernova data stems from a 2.95 sigma tension between DESI and DES-S...