Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 85 references

DIALECT, a software package for exciton spectra and dynamics in large molecular assemblies from weak to strong light-matter coupling regimes

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read DIALECT is an open-source package that computes excited-state spectra and nonadiabatic dynamics for molecular assemblies of thousands of atoms, from weak to strong light-matter coupling.

desk verdict A genuinely useful open-source implementation of the group's FMO-LC-TDDFTB methods, but the paper validates the software's operation rather than the underlying fragment reconstruction, so the quantitative capability claims should be read as plausible but not proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09418 v1 pith:ZUHS3V44 submitted 2025-05-14 physics.chem-ph physics.comp-ph

Richard Einsele , Xincheng Miao , Luca Nils Philipp , Roland Mitric This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords DIALECTFMO-LC-TDDFTBexcitondynamicsnonadiabaticmolecularpolaritondispersiondensity-functionaltight-bindingfragmentorbitalchargetransfer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces DIALECT, a Rust-based simulation package that treats excited states and dynamics of large molecular assemblies by dividing the system into fragments, computing locally excited and charge-transfer states for each monomer and pair, and diagonalizing the resulting excitonic Hamiltonian. The central claim is that this FMO-LC-TDDFTB approach is efficient enough to handle assemblies with thousands of atoms, while still describing nonadiabatic dynamics, exciton transport, and polaritonic coupling to microcavities. If correct, DIALECT would let researchers model energy and charge transfer in molecular materials, biological aggregates, and optoelectronic devices at a scale previously out of reach for first-principles methods.

What carries the argument

The central object is the quasi-diabatic excitonic Hamiltonian, whose basis comprises locally excited states on each molecular fragment and charge-transfer states between pairs of fragments, with matrix elements obtained from long-range-corrected Tamm-Dancoff density-functional tight-binding calculations on monomers and dimers. Exciton couplings are expressed through transition charges and the long-range-corrected $\gamma$ matrix, and nonadiabatic dynamics are propagated either by Tully surface hopping or by Ehrenfest dynamics with a collapse-to-block decoherence correction. For strong light-matter coupling, photonic basis states are appended to the Hamiltonian with light-matter matrix elements proportional to the transition dipole moments of the LE states.

What would settle it

Benchmark the method against a full-system TD-DFTB or high-level ab initio calculation on a small aggregate, for example a chain of five to ten anthracene or naphthalene molecules, and compare excited-state energies, oscillator strengths, and exciton-transfer dynamics; significant deviations beyond roughly 0.1 eV or qualitatively different population dynamics would disprove the fragment-pair assumption and the neglect of inter-fragment nonadiabatic couplings.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is a unified computational framework in which a quasi-diabatic excitonic Hamiltonian containing locally excited (LE) and charge-transfer (CT) states is built from monomer and dimer fragment calculations, then coupled to cavity photon modes. The paper demonstrates this machinery by computing the polariton dispersion of a 203-molecule naphthalene aggregate for different polarization directions, tracking exciton transfer along an anthracene chain with both standard and decoherence-corrected Ehrenfest dynamics, and showing that excited-state calculations on tetracene aggregates up to 8850 atoms are feasible in about an hour. The authors assert that the package enables first-principles atomistic simulations of exciton and charge transport in large biomolecular systems and realistic optoelectronic models.

Load-bearing premise

The entire method assumes that the excited states of a large assembly are fully determined by electronic structure calculations on single molecules and pairs of molecules, and that nonadiabatic couplings between different fragments can be neglected; if many-chromophore polarization or inter-fragment couplings are significant, the computed spectra and dynamics will be biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Exciton and charge-transfer dynamics in aggregates of thousands of atoms can be simulated directly with surface hopping or decoherence-corrected Ehrenfest dynamics.
  • Polariton dispersions of realistic molecular aggregates, including intermolecular excitonic couplings, can be obtained for arbitrary cavity polarization and mode energy.
  • The near-linear scaling of the ground-state SCC step and roughly one-hour timings for 200 excited states of an 8850-atom system make the method practical for organic semiconductor and biomolecular models.
  • The photoisomerization branching ratios obtained for cis-stilbene, though not quantitatively on par with high-level methods, provide a fast exploratory route to photodynamics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the fragment-pair assumption is robust, DIALECT could compute exciton diffusion lengths from first principles by averaging many decoherence-corrected Ehrenfest trajectories, which the paper leaves as future work.
  • The same excitonic Hamiltonian could be extended beyond single cavity modes to include multiple photon modes or vibronic coupling, giving a path to polariton chemistry and vibrational spectra that the authors do not pursue here.
  • The accuracy of the method for systems with strong inter-fragment polarization remains untested; a direct comparison with full-system TD-DFT on small clusters would quantify the approximation's error, a benchmark the paper does not provide.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript introduces DIALECT, an open-source Rust package implementing DFTB2, DFTB3, LC-DFTB, FMO-LC-TDDFTB, surface-hopping and decoherence-corrected Ehrenfest nonadiabatic dynamics, and a Tavis-Cummings-based polaritonic coupling scheme. The theoretical part recapitulates the authors' earlier method papers (Refs. 58–60). Three example calculations are presented: LC-TDDFTB surface-hopping photodynamics of cis-stilbene with product branching ratios, polariton dispersion of a 203-molecule naphthalene cluster, and FMO-LC-TDDFTB Ehrenfest exciton transfer in a 30-molecule anthracene chain. Timings for water and tetracene clusters with up to about 9000 atoms are reported. The stated goal is to demonstrate that DIALECT can simulate excited-state spectra and dynamics in large molecular assemblies from weak to strong light-matter coupling regimes.

Significance. The value of the paper, if the implementation is sound, is as a publicly available tool that brings FMO-LC-TDDFTB and polaritonic excited-state calculations to a community that currently lacks a single package for these tasks. The authors deserve credit for open-sourcing the code, depositing example data, and reporting wall-clock timings; the examples run and the equations are consistent with the authors' prior work. However, the quantitative claims are not yet backed by adequate validation: the cis-stilbene branching ratios differ substantially from reference methods, the anthracene dynamics rests on 10 trajectories, and the central FMO-LC-TDDFTB reconstruction is not benchmarked against full-system or high-level references. The paper is therefore best read as an implementation report, and the stronger capability claims in Section 5 should be softened.

major comments (4)
  1. [2.3, Eqs. (12)-(22)] The excited-state Hamiltonian of a full assembly is reconstructed from monomer and dimer fragment TDA calculations. This reconstruction is the central approximation of FMO-LC-TDDFTB, but the manuscript provides no validation: it does not compare a computed spectrum with a full-system LC-TDA-DFTB calculation on a small aggregate, nor with high-level reference data, and it does not test how the results depend on the number of included LE and CT states. Because the polariton dispersion (Section 3.2) and the exciton dynamics (Section 3.3) both inherit this Hamiltonian, the quantitative capability claim in Section 5 is not supported by the evidence presented here. The authors should either include such a benchmark or explicitly state that the examples are algorithmic demonstrations, not accuracy benchmarks.
  2. [2.5, Eq. (31)] The text following Eq. (31) states that the nonadiabatic coupling is limited to LE and CT states on the same fragment and is zero between all other quasi-diabatic states. These states are fragment-local TDA solutions; they are not obtained by an explicit diabatization across fragments. For a close-packed aggregate, nuclear motion changes inter-fragment overlaps and fragment orbital energies, so derivative couplings between LE states on different fragments need not vanish. If these couplings are comparable to the excitonic couplings that drive energy transfer, the population dynamics in Figures 4 and 5 would be biased in an uncontrolled way. Please provide a numerical estimate of the neglected inter-fragment derivative couplings for a representative geometry, or benchmark the Ehrenfest dynamics against a method that includes them.
  3. [3.3 and 4.2] The anthracene example is the only FMO-LC-TDDFTB nonadiabatic dynamics demonstration in the paper, and it is based on 10 trajectories per method; the authors themselves call it a proof of concept. That is acceptable for an implementation paper, but the concluding statement in Section 5 that DIALECT can be used to simulate localized exciton transport goes beyond what the data show. In addition, two tunable parameters enter this example—the atom-specific TAB decoherence parameter alpha_R in Eq. (35) and the harmonic restraint force constant—without any sensitivity analysis. Please add a sensitivity study, increase the number of trajectories, or explicitly restrict the conclusion to algorithmic demonstration.
  4. [2.3, 3.3, 4.2] The number of LE states per monomer and CT states per pair is chosen as an input (three LE and one CT per pair in anthracene; four LE and one CT per pair in tetracene) with no convergence test with respect to this basis truncation. The excitonic Hamiltonian is only as complete as the selected diabatic basis, and omitted charge-transfer or higher-lying LE states can change both spectra and dynamics. A convergence study for a small aggregate, or a physical justification for the truncation, is needed before the spectra and dynamics can be considered converged.
minor comments (6)
  1. [2.1, Eq. (4)] In Eq. (4), the long-range gamma-matrix is written as erf(C_lr_AB) R_AB / R_AB; the argument of the error function appears to be missing a factor C_lr_AB R_AB. Please compare with Eq. (2) and correct.
  2. [2.4, Eq. (24)] In Eq. (24), E_n(R(t)) c_n(t) is missing the closing parenthesis on R(t); the equation should read E_n(R(t)) c_n(t).
  3. [2.6] The acronym 'FMO-LC-TDDTB' appears in the first paragraph of Section 2.6; it should be 'FMO-LC-TDDFTB'.
  4. [3.1 and 3.3] The parameter set is called 'ob263' in Sections 3.1 and 3.2 but 'ob2' in Section 3.3; please clarify whether these are the same parameter set.
  5. [3.2] The paper's title promises 'weak to strong light-matter coupling regimes', but the polariton example only exercises the strong-coupling regime; a sentence explaining what the weak-coupling capability corresponds to in the implemented formalism would help.
  6. [Fig. 4] The monomer labels 'M. 1-3' etc. in Figure 4 are not defined in the text; please state how the monomers are ordered along the anthracene chain.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the example calculations are implementation demonstrations, and the core FMO-LC-TDDFTB equations are reproduced from prior independent method papers rather than fitted to the target results.

full rationale

The paper is a software/implementation report. The central equations (FMO-LC-TDDFTB excitonic Hamiltonian, Ehrenfest propagation, and Tavis-Cummings cavity coupling) are stated explicitly in Sections 2.3, 2.5, and 2.6 and credited to Refs. 58-60; those are independently published method papers, and this work reproduces the equations rather than deriving its conclusions from a self-citation chain. None of the example calculations fit parameters to the quantities they display. The cis-stilbene branching ratios are compared with, not calibrated to, XMS-CASPT2/OM3-MRCISD reference values, and the paper acknowledges the deviations. The anthracene exciton populations are propagated using literature decoherence parameters (Granucci C = 0.1 hartree; Esch-Levine alpha values 40 and 220 a0^-2), not values fitted to the anthracene output. The naphthalene polariton dispersion is obtained by direct diagonalization of the Hamiltonian in Eq. 37, with monomer transition dipoles computed independently by TDA, so the branch splittings follow from Eq. 38 by forward construction rather than by fitting. The one genuinely unverified element is the assumption after Eq. 31 that inter-fragment nonadiabatic couplings vanish; this is an accuracy and benchmarking risk, not a circular step, because the paper does not assume the conclusion it purports to demonstrate from that approximation. For validating that the software runs and implements the stated methods, the paper is self-contained; the quantitative accuracy of FMO-LC-TDDFTB for large aggregates remains an external benchmarking question rather than a circularity defect.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The parameters listed are control parameters from the dynamics methods. The axioms are the methodological approximations inherited from the fragment and tight-binding formalism, none of which are unique to this paper, but all of which are load-bearing for the computed spectra and dynamics.

free parameters (2)
  • TAB decoherence parameter alpha_R = 40 a0^-2 (H), 220 a0^-2 (C)
    Atom-specific decoherence parameter in Eq. 35, used in the anthracene Ehrenfest example. It is sourced from the TAB method literature, not fitted to the target dynamics, but it does influence the observed localization difference.
  • Harmonic restraint force constant = not specified
    Added to prevent anthracene monomers from drifting apart in the exciton transfer simulation; its strength is not stated, and it could affect the exciton transport dynamics.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The total energy and excited-state Hamiltonian of a molecular aggregate are accurately represented by the FMO2 pairwise expansion (Eq. 6), with monomer energies and pairwise corrections; higher-order fragment interactions are negligible.
    The entire DIALECT excited-state machinery rests on constructing the system from fragment monomers and dimers (Sections 2.2-2.3). No convergence test with respect to fragment order is provided in this paper.
  • domain assumption Nonadiabatic couplings exist only between LE and CT states on the same fragment; couplings between states on different fragments are exactly zero (Section 2.5).
    This is stated after Eq. 31 and is central to the Ehrenfest dynamics; it may fail when fragments are close and electronic wavefunctions overlap.
  • domain assumption The Tamm-Dancoff approximation (TDA) is sufficient for the excited-state spectra and dynamics; the full Casida linear-response formalism is not implemented (Section 2.3).
    The paper notes only TDA is supported; for some systems, especially those with strong ground-state correlation or certain CT states, TDA may introduce errors, though it is common in TD-DFTB.
  • domain assumption The first-order approximation S^{-1/2} approximately (3/2) I - (1/2) S (Eq. 21) is accurate for constructing the orthogonalized Hamiltonian H'.
    This approximation is used in the LE-CT and CT-CT couplings (Eqs. 18-22); it is exact only for S close to identity, which may not hold for strongly overlapping fragments.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of DIALECT, a software package for exciton spectra and dynamics in large molecular assemblies from weak to strong light-matter coupling regimes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZUHS3V44

@misc{pith2026250509418,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: DIALECT, a software package for exciton spectra and dynamics in large molecular assemblies from weak to strong light-matter coupling regimes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZUHS3V44}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09418}
}
read the original abstract

The software package DIALECT is introduced, which provides the capability of calculating excited-state properties and nonadiabatic dynamics of large molecular systems and can be applied to simulate energy and charge-transfer processes in molecular materials. To this end, we employ the FMO-LC-TDDFTB methodology, which combines the use of the fragment molecular orbital approach with the density-functional tight-binding method and an excitonic Hamiltonian including local and charge-transfer excitations. In this work, we present the features and capabilities of the DIALECT software package in simulating the excited state dynamics of molecules and molecular aggregates using exemplary trajectory surface hopping as well as decoherence corrected Ehrenfest dynamics calculations in the framework of LC-TDDFTB and FMO-LC-TDDFTB. In addition, the capability of simulating the polaritonic excited state properties is highlighted by the calculation of the polariton dispersion of an aggregate of naphthalene molecules. The development of the DIALECT program will facilitate the investigation of exciton and charge transport in large and complex molecular systems, such as biological aggregates, nanomaterials and other complex organic molecular systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.09418 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Excitonic Hamiltonian for an example system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Nonadiabatic dynamics simulation of the pho [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Polariton dispersion of an aggregate of naph [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Averaged population contributions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Transition densities of the excited state configuration at different points in time along two exemplary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Computation timings of FMO-LC-TDDFTB calculations of seven tetracene aggregates, consisting of up to 8850 atoms. already shown in a previous work, the excited state cal￾culation of large molecular assemblies does not have the same linear scaling behavior of the ground-…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: SCC timings for DFTB and FMO-DFTB cal￾culations of various water clusters, containing 5, 33, 66, 113, 267, 522 and 903 H2O molecules (15, 99, 198, 339, 801, 1566 and 2709 atoms). The inset shows the SCC times up to 8 seconds to differentiate between FMO￾DFTB2 and FMO-L…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D.; Suhai, S

    Frauenheim, T.; Seifert, G.; Elstner, M.; Niehaus, T.; Köhler, C.; Amkreutz, M.; Sternberg, M.; Hajnal, Z.; Carlo, A. D.; Suhai, S. Atomistic simulations of complex materials: ground-state and excited-state properties. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2002, 14, 3015

    2002

  2. [2]

    Single- Reference ab Initio Methods for the Calculation of Excited States of Large Molecules

    Dreuw, A.; Head-Gordon, M. Single- Reference ab Initio Methods for the Calculation of Excited States of Large Molecules . Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 4009--4037, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2005

  3. [3]

    Progress and Challenges in the Calculation of Electronic Excited States

    González, L.; Escudero, D.; Serrano-Andrés, L. Progress and Challenges in the Calculation of Electronic Excited States . ChemPhysChem 2012, 13, 28--51

    2012

  4. [4]

    J.; Repa, G

    Knepp, Z. J.; Repa, G. M.; Fredin, L. A. Excited-state methods for molecular systems: Performance , pitfalls, and practical guidance. Chem. Phys. Rev. 2025, 6, 021304

    2025

  5. [5]

    Casida, M. E. Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods ; World Scientific, 1995; pp 155--192

    1995

  6. [6]

    Progress in Time - Dependent Density - Functional Theory

    Casida, M.; Huix-Rotllant, M. Progress in Time - Dependent Density - Functional Theory . Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2012, 63, 287--323

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    A simplified Tamm - Dancoff density functional approach for the electronic excitation spectra of very large molecules

    Grimme, S. A simplified Tamm - Dancoff density functional approach for the electronic excitation spectra of very large molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 138, 244104

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    A simplified time-dependent density functional theory approach for electronic ultraviolet and circular dichroism spectra of very large molecules

    Bannwarth, C.; Grimme, S. A simplified time-dependent density functional theory approach for electronic ultraviolet and circular dichroism spectra of very large molecules. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2014, 1040-1041, 45--53

    work page 2014

Show all 85 references
  1. [9]

    Tight-binding approximations to time-dependent density functional theory — A fast approach for the calculation of electronically excited states

    Rüger, R.; van Lenthe, E.; Heine, T.; Visscher, L. Tight-binding approximations to time-dependent density functional theory — A fast approach for the calculation of electronically excited states. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 144, 184103

    2016

  2. [10]

    J.; Hine, N

    Zuehlsdorff, T. J.; Hine, N. D. M.; Spencer, J. S.; Harrison, N. M.; Riley, D. J.; Haynes, P. D. Linear-scaling time-dependent density-functional theory in the linear response formalism. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 064104

    2013

  3. [11]

    J.; Hine, N

    Zuehlsdorff, T. J.; Hine, N. D. M.; Payne, M. C.; Haynes, P. D. Linear-scaling time-dependent density-functional theory beyond the Tamm - Dancoff approximation: Obtaining efficiency and accuracy with in situ optimised local orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 143, 204107

    2015

  4. [12]

    R.; Neugebauer, J

    Jacob, C. R.; Neugebauer, J. Subsystem density-functional theory: Subsystem density-functional theory. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2014, 4, 325--362

    2014

  5. [13]

    R.; Neugebauer, J

    Jacob, C. R.; Neugebauer, J. Subsystem density-functional theory (update). Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2024, 14, e1700

    2024

  6. [14]

    J.; Holzer, C.; Andersen, J

    Franzke, Y. J.; Holzer, C.; Andersen, J. H.; Begušić, T.; Bruder, F.; Coriani, S.; Della Sala, F.; Fabiano, E.; Fedotov, D. A.; Fürst, S. et al. TURBOMOLE : Today and Tomorrow . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2023, acs.jctc.3c00347

    2023

  7. [15]

    Niemeyer, N.; Eschenbach, P.; Bensberg, M.; Tölle, J.; Hellmann, L.; Lampe, L.; Massolle, A.; Rikus, A.; Schnieders, D.; Unsleber, J. P. et al. The subsystem quantum chemistry program Serenity . Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2023, 13, e1647

    2023

  8. [16]

    2025; https://github.com/grimme-lab/std2

    std2. 2025; https://github.com/grimme-lab/std2

    2025

  9. [17]

    Semiempirical quantum–chemical methods

    Thiel, W. Semiempirical quantum–chemical methods. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2014, 4, 145--157

    2014

  10. [18]

    S.; Kubař, T.; Cui, Q.; Elstner, M

    Christensen, A. S.; Kubař, T.; Cui, Q.; Elstner, M. Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Methods for Noncovalent Interactions for Chemical and Biochemical Applications . Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 5301--5337

    2016

  11. [19]

    Dewar, M. J. S.; Thiel, W. Ground states of molecules. 38. The MNDO method. Approximations and parameters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4899--4907

    1977

  12. [20]

    Dewar, M. J. S.; Zoebisch, E. G.; Healy, E. F.; Stewart, J. J. P. Development and use of quantum mechanical molecular models. 76. AM1 : a new general purpose quantum mechanical molecular model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3902--3909

    1985

  13. [21]

    Stewart, J. J. P. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods I . Method . J. Comput. Chem. 1989, 10, 209--220

    1989

  14. [22]

    Construction of tight-binding-like potentials on the basis of density-functional theory: Application to carbon

    Porezag, D.; Frauenheim, T.; Köhler, T.; Seifert, G.; Kaschner, R. Construction of tight-binding-like potentials on the basis of density-functional theory: Application to carbon. Phys. Rev. B 1995, 51, 12947--12957

    1995

  15. [23]

    Self-consistent-charge density-functional tight-binding method for simulations of complex materials properties

    Elstner, M.; Porezag, D.; Jungnickel, G.; Elsner, J.; Haugk, M.; Frauenheim, T.; Suhai, S.; Seifert, G. Self-consistent-charge density-functional tight-binding method for simulations of complex materials properties. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 58, 7260--7268

    1998

  16. [24]

    A.; Suhai, S.; Della Sala, F.; Lugli, P.; Elstner, M.; Seifert, G.; Frauenheim, T

    Niehaus, T. A.; Suhai, S.; Della Sala, F.; Lugli, P.; Elstner, M.; Seifert, G.; Frauenheim, T. Tight-binding approach to time-dependent density-functional response theory. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 63, 085108

    2001

  17. [25]

    DFTB3 : Extension of the Self - Consistent - Charge Density - Functional Tight - Binding Method ( SCC - DFTB )

    Gaus, M.; Cui, Q.; Elstner, M. DFTB3 : Extension of the Self - Consistent - Charge Density - Functional Tight - Binding Method ( SCC - DFTB ). J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 931--948, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2011

  18. [26]

    Long-range correction for tight-binding TD - DFT

    Humeniuk, A.; Mitrić, R. Long-range correction for tight-binding TD - DFT . J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 143, 134120

    2015

  19. [27]

    Nonadiabatic Dynamics within Time - Dependent Density Functional Tight Binding Method

    Mitrić, R.; Werner, U.; Wohlgemuth, M.; Seifert, G.; Bonačić-Koutecký, V. Nonadiabatic Dynamics within Time - Dependent Density Functional Tight Binding Method . J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 12700--12705, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2009

  20. [28]

    DFTBaby : A software package for non-adiabatic molecular dynamics simulations based on long-range corrected tight-binding TD - DFT ( B )

    Humeniuk, A.; Mitrić, R. DFTBaby : A software package for non-adiabatic molecular dynamics simulations based on long-range corrected tight-binding TD - DFT ( B ). Comput. Phys. Commun. 2017, 221, 174--202

    2017

  21. [29]

    G.; Hilal, R

    Stojanović, L.; Aziz, S. G.; Hilal, R. H.; Plasser, F.; Niehaus, T. A.; Barbatti, M. Nonadiabatic Dynamics of Cycloparaphenylenes with TD - DFTB Surface Hopping . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017, 13, 5846--5860

    2017

  22. [30]

    Spin‐flip approach within time‐dependent density functional tight‐binding method: Theory and applications

    Inamori, M.; Yoshikawa, T.; Ikabata, Y.; Nishimura, Y.; Nakai, H. Spin‐flip approach within time‐dependent density functional tight‐binding method: Theory and applications. J. Comput. Chem. 2020, 41, 1538--1548

    2020

  23. [31]

    Uratani, H.; Morioka, T.; Yoshikawa, T.; Nakai, H. Fast Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics via Spin - Flip Time - Dependent Density - Functional Tight - Binding Approach : Application to Nonradiative Relaxation of Tetraphenylethylene with Locked Aromatic Rings . J. Chem. Theory C...

    2020

  24. [32]

    Y.; Dumitrică, T.; Dominguez, A

    Hourahine, B.; Aradi, B.; Blum, V.; Bonafé, F.; Buccheri, A.; Camacho, C.; Cevallos, C.; Deshaye, M. Y.; Dumitrică, T.; Dominguez, A. et al. DFTB +, a software package for efficient approximate density functional theory based atomistic simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152, 124101

    2020

  25. [33]

    cp2k: atomistic simulations of condensed matter systems

    Hutter, J.; Iannuzzi, M.; Schiffmann, F.; VandeVondele, J. cp2k: atomistic simulations of condensed matter systems. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2014, 4, 15--25

    2014

  26. [34]

    M.; Baerends, E

    te Velde, G.; Bickelhaupt, F. M.; Baerends, E. J.; Fonseca Guerra, C.; van Gisbergen, S. J. A.; Snijders, J. G.; Ziegler, T. Chemistry with ADF . J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 931--967

    2001

  27. [35]

    Density-functional tight-binding for beginners

    Koskinen, P.; Mäkinen, V. Density-functional tight-binding for beginners. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2009, 47, 237--253

    2009

  28. [36]

    Grimme, S.; Bannwarth, C.; Shushkov, P. A Robust and Accurate Tight - Binding Quantum Chemical Method for Structures , Vibrational Frequencies , and Noncovalent Interactions of Large Molecular Systems Parametrized for All spd- Block Elements ( Z = 1–86). J. Chem. Theory Comput...

    2017

  29. [37]

    Bannwarth, C.; Ehlert, S.; Grimme, S. GFN2 - xTB — An Accurate and Broadly Parametrized Self - Consistent Tight - Binding Quantum Chemical Method with Multipole Electrostatics and Density - Dependent Dispersion Contributions . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 1652--1671

    2019

  30. [38]

    Extended tight‐binding quantum chemistry methods

    Bannwarth, C.; Caldeweyher, E.; Ehlert, S.; Hansen, A.; Pracht, P.; Seibert, J.; Spicher, S.; Grimme, S. Extended tight‐binding quantum chemistry methods. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2021, 11

    2021

  31. [39]

    Fragment molecular orbital method: an approximate computational method for large molecules

    Kitaura, K.; Ikeo, E.; Asada, T.; Nakano, T.; Uebayasi, M. Fragment molecular orbital method: an approximate computational method for large molecules. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 313, 701--706

    1999

  32. [40]

    G.; Ishida, T.; Kitaura, K

    Fedorov, D. G.; Ishida, T.; Kitaura, K. Multilayer Formulation of the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method ( FMO ). J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 2638--2646

    2005

  33. [41]

    Fragment molecular orbital method: application to polypeptides

    Nakano, T.; Kaminuma, T.; Sato, T.; Akiyama, Y.; Uebayasi, M.; Kitaura, K. Fragment molecular orbital method: application to polypeptides. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 318, 614--618

    2000

  34. [42]

    Fragment molecular orbital method: use of approximate electrostatic potential

    Nakano, T.; Kaminuma, T.; Sato, T.; Fukuzawa, K.; Akiyama, Y.; Uebayasi, M.; Kitaura, K. Fragment molecular orbital method: use of approximate electrostatic potential. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 351, 475--480

    2002

  35. [43]

    Implementation of divide-and-conquer method including Hartree - Fock exchange interaction

    Akama, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Nakai, H. Implementation of divide-and-conquer method including Hartree - Fock exchange interaction. J. Comput. Chem. 2007, 28, 2003--2012

    2007

  36. [44]

    Extension of linear-scaling divide-and-conquer-based correlation method to coupled cluster theory with singles and doubles excitations

    Kobayashi, M.; Nakai, H. Extension of linear-scaling divide-and-conquer-based correlation method to coupled cluster theory with singles and doubles excitations. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 044103

    2008

  37. [45]

    Divide-and-conquer self-consistent field calculation for open-shell systems: Implementation and application

    Kobayashi, M.; Yoshikawa, T.; Nakai, H. Divide-and-conquer self-consistent field calculation for open-shell systems: Implementation and application. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2010, 500, 172--177

    2010

  38. [46]

    M.; Webb, S.; Galvez Vallejo, J.; Tiwari, A.; Sundriyal, V.; Sosonkina, M.; Shen, J.; Schoendorff, G

    Zahariev, F.; Xu, P.; Westheimer, B. M.; Webb, S.; Galvez Vallejo, J.; Tiwari, A.; Sundriyal, V.; Sosonkina, M.; Shen, J.; Schoendorff, G. et al. The General Atomic and Molecular Electronic Structure System ( GAMESS ): Novel Methods on Novel Architectures . J. Chem. Theory Com...

    2023

  39. [47]

    font-variant:small-caps

    Nishimura, Y.; Nakai, H. D span style="font-variant:small-caps;" cdftbmd /span : Divide ‐and‐ Conquer Density Functional Tight ‐ Binding Program for Huge ‐ System Quantum Mechanical Molecular Dynamics Simulations . J. Comput. Chem. 2019, 40, 1538--1549

    2019

  40. [48]

    Quantum Chemical Calculations for up to One Hundred Million Atoms Using Dcdftbmd Code on Supercomputer Fugaku

    Nishimura, Y.; Nakai, H. Quantum Chemical Calculations for up to One Hundred Million Atoms Using Dcdftbmd Code on Supercomputer Fugaku . Chem. Lett. 2021, 50, 1546--1550

    2021

  41. [49]

    G.; Irle, S

    Nishimoto, Y.; Fedorov, D. G.; Irle, S. Density- Functional Tight - Binding Combined with the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 4801--4812

    2014

  42. [50]

    W.; Nishimura, Y

    Nakai, H.; Sakti, A. W.; Nishimura, Y. Divide-and- Conquer - Type Density - Functional Tight - Binding Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Proton Diffusion in a Bulk Water System . J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 217--221

    2016

  43. [51]

    Development of Large - Scale Excited - State Calculations Based on the Divide -and- Conquer Time - Dependent Density Functional Tight - Binding Method

    Komoto, N.; Yoshikawa, T.; Ono, J.; Nishimura, Y.; Nakai, H. Development of Large - Scale Excited - State Calculations Based on the Divide -and- Conquer Time - Dependent Density Functional Tight - Binding Method . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 1719--1727

    2019

  44. [52]

    Nishimoto, Y.; Fedorov, D. G. The fragment molecular orbital method combined with density-functional tight-binding and the polarizable continuum model. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 22047--22061

    2016

  45. [53]

    Q.; Nishimoto, Y.; Fedorov, D

    Vuong, V. Q.; Nishimoto, Y.; Fedorov, D. G.; Sumpter, B. G.; Niehaus, T. A.; Irle, S. The Fragment Molecular Orbital Method Based on Long - Range Corrected Density - Functional Tight - Binding . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 3008--3020

    2019

  46. [54]

    Large- Scale Molecular Dynamics Simulation for Ground and Excited States Based on Divide -and- Conquer Long - Range Corrected Density - Functional Tight - Binding Method

    Komoto, N.; Yoshikawa, T.; Nishimura, Y.; Nakai, H. Large- Scale Molecular Dynamics Simulation for Ground and Excited States Based on Divide -and- Conquer Long - Range Corrected Density - Functional Tight - Binding Method . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 2369--2378

    2020

  47. [55]

    Nishimoto, Y.; Fedorov, D. G. The fragment molecular orbital method combined with density-functional tight-binding and periodic boundary conditions. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 154, 111102

    2021

  48. [56]

    Trajectory Surface Hopping Approach to Condensed - Phase Nonradiative Relaxation Dynamics Using Divide -and- Conquer Spin - Flip Time - Dependent Density - Functional Tight Binding

    Uratani, H.; Yoshikawa, T.; Nakai, H. Trajectory Surface Hopping Approach to Condensed - Phase Nonradiative Relaxation Dynamics Using Divide -and- Conquer Spin - Flip Time - Dependent Density - Functional Tight Binding . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2021, 17, 1290--1300

    2021

  49. [57]

    Nakata, H.; Fedorov, D. G. Analytic Gradient for Time - Dependent Density Functional Theory Combined with the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2023, 19, 1276--1285

    2023

  50. [58]

    Long-range corrected fragment molecular orbital density functional tight-binding method for excited states in large molecular systems

    Einsele, R.; Hoche, J.; Mitrić, R. Long-range corrected fragment molecular orbital density functional tight-binding method for excited states in large molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 2023, 158, 044121

    2023

  51. [59]

    Nonadiabatic Exciton Dynamics and Energy Gradients in the Framework of FMO - LC - TDDFTB

    Einsele, R.; Mitrić, R. Nonadiabatic Exciton Dynamics and Energy Gradients in the Framework of FMO - LC - TDDFTB . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2024, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2024

  52. [60]

    N.; Mitrić, R

    Einsele, R.; Philipp, L. N.; Mitrić, R. FMO - LC - TDDFTB method for excited states of large molecular assemblies in the strong light-matter coupling regime. J. Chem. Phys. 2024, 161, 154106

    2024

  53. [61]

    2025; https://github.com/dialect-rs/DIALECT-rs, original-date: 2022-11-23T10:46:29Z

    DIALECT . 2025; https://github.com/dialect-rs/DIALECT-rs, original-date: 2022-11-23T10:46:29Z

    2025

  54. [62]

    Perkel, J. M. Why scientists are turning to Rust . Nature 2020, 588, 185--186

    2020

  55. [63]

    Q.; Akkarapattiakal Kuriappan, J.; Kubillus, M.; Kranz, J

    Vuong, V. Q.; Akkarapattiakal Kuriappan, J.; Kubillus, M.; Kranz, J. J.; Mast, T.; Niehaus, T. A.; Irle, S.; Elstner, M. Parametrization and Benchmark of Long - Range Corrected DFTB2 for Organic Molecules . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 115--125

    2018

  56. [64]

    Davidson, E. R. The iterative calculation of a few of the lowest eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of large real-symmetric matrices. J. Comput. Phys. 1975, 17, 87--94

    1975

  57. [65]

    Tully, J. C. Molecular dynamics with electronic transitions. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 93, 1061--1071

    1990

  58. [66]

    Tully, J. C. Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1991, 40, 299--309

    1991

  59. [67]

    Niehaus, T. A. Exact non-adiabatic coupling vectors for the time-dependent density functional based tight-binding method. J. Chem. Phys. 2023, 158, 054103

    2023

  60. [68]

    Theoretical Exploration of Ultrafast Dynamics in Atomic Clusters : Analysis and Control

    Bonačić-Koutecký, V.; Mitrić, R. Theoretical Exploration of Ultrafast Dynamics in Atomic Clusters : Analysis and Control . Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 11--66, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2005

  61. [69]

    G.; Mitrić, R

    Lisinetskaya, P. G.; Mitrić, R. Simulation of laser-induced coupled electron-nuclear dynamics and time-resolved harmonic spectra in complex systems. Phys. Rev. A 2011, 83, 033408, Publisher: American Physical Society

    2011

  62. [70]

    Critical appraisal of the fewest switches algorithm for surface hopping

    Granucci, G.; Persico, M. Critical appraisal of the fewest switches algorithm for surface hopping. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 134114

    2007

  63. [71]

    Including quantum decoherence in surface hopping

    Granucci, G.; Persico, M.; Zoccante, A. Including quantum decoherence in surface hopping. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 133, 134111

    2010

  64. [72]

    Tully, J. C. Mixed quantum–classical dynamics. Faraday Discuss. 1998, 110, 407--419, Publisher: The Royal Society of Chemistry

    1998

  65. [73]

    P.; Levine, B

    Esch, M. P.; Levine, B. G. State-pairwise decoherence times for nonadiabatic dynamics on more than two electronic states. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152, 234105

    2020

  66. [74]

    P.; Levine, B

    Esch, M. P.; Levine, B. G. Decoherence-corrected Ehrenfest molecular dynamics on many electronic states. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 153, 114104

    2020

  67. [75]

    P.; Levine, B

    Esch, M. P.; Levine, B. An accurate, non-empirical method for incorporating decoherence into Ehrenfest dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 155, 214101

    2021

  68. [76]

    Tavis, M.; Cummings, F. W. Exact Solution for an N - Molecule — Radiation - Field Hamiltonian . Phys. Rev. 1968, 170, 379--384

    1968

  69. [77]

    Tavis, M.; Cummings, F. W. Approximate Solutions for an N - Molecule - Radiation - Field Hamiltonian . Phys. Rev. 1969, 188, 692--695

    1969

  70. [78]

    N.; Granovsky, A

    Ioffe, I. N.; Granovsky, A. A. Photoisomerization of Stilbene : The Detailed XMCQDPT2 Treatment . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 4973--4990, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2013

  71. [79]

    J.; Boguslavskiy, A

    Williams, M.; Forbes, R.; Weir, H.; Veyrinas, K.; MacDonell, R. J.; Boguslavskiy, A. E.; Schuurman, M. S.; Stolow, A.; Martinez, T. J. Unmasking the cis- Stilbene Phantom State via Vacuum Ultraviolet Time - Resolved Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Ab Initio Multiple Spawning . ...

    2021

  72. [80]

    Ultrafast Ring Closure Reaction of Gaseous cis- Stilbene from S _1 ( ^ * )

    Karashima, S.; Miao, X.; Kanayama, A.; Yamamoto, Y.-i.; Nishitani, J.; Kavka, N.; Mitric, R.; Suzuki, T. Ultrafast Ring Closure Reaction of Gaseous cis- Stilbene from S _1 ( ^ * ) . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 3283--3288, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2023

  73. [81]

    Sensitivity Analysis in Photodynamics : How Does the Electronic Structure Control cis- Stilbene Photodynamics ? J

    Jíra, T.; Janoš, J.; Slavíček, P. Sensitivity Analysis in Photodynamics : How Does the Electronic Structure Control cis- Stilbene Photodynamics ? J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2024, 20, 10972--10985, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2024

  74. [82]

    Charge Density Study of Naphthalene Based on X -ray Diffraction Data at Four Different Temperatures and Theoretical Calculations

    Oddershede, J.; Larsen, S. Charge Density Study of Naphthalene Based on X -ray Diffraction Data at Four Different Temperatures and Theoretical Calculations . J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 1057--1063, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2004

  75. [83]

    F.; Sovago, I.; Cottrell, S

    Macrae, C. F.; Sovago, I.; Cottrell, S. J.; Galek, P. T. A.; McCabe, P.; Pidcock, E.; Platings, M.; Shields, G. P.; Stevens, J. S.; Towler, M. et al. Mercury 4.0: from visualization to analysis, design and prediction. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2020, 53, 226--235

    2020

  76. [84]

    The crystallography of anthracene at 95° K and 290° K

    Mason, R. The crystallography of anthracene at 95° K and 290° K . Acta Cryst 1964, 17, 547--555

    1964

  77. [85]

    ur Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie, Julius-Maximilians-Universit\

    Holmes, D.; Kumaraswamy, S.; Matzger, A. J.; Vollhardt, K. P. C. On the Nature of Nonplanarity in the [ N ] Phenylenes . Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 3399--3412 mcitethebibliography main.tex0000664000000000000000000001746515011122400011223 0ustar rootroot [journal=jpcafh,manuscript=...

    2013 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.