REVIEW 2 cited by
Hierarchical Policy Learning is Sensitive to Goal Space Design
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Hierarchy in reinforcement learning agents allows for control at multiple time scales yielding improved sample efficiency, the ability to deal with long time horizons and transferability of sub-policies to tasks outside the training distribution. It is often implemented as a master policy providing goals to a sub-policy. Ideally, we would like the goal-spaces to be learned, however, properties of optimal goal spaces still remain unknown and consequently there is no method yet to learn optimal goal spaces. Motivated by this, we systematically analyze how various modifications to the ground-truth goal-space affect learning in hierarchical models with the aim of identifying important properties of optimal goal spaces. Our results show that, while rotation of ground-truth goal spaces and noise had no effect, having additional unnecessary factors significantly impaired learning in hierarchical models.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CORD: Generalizable Cooperation via Role Diversity
CORD improves zero-shot cooperation in multi-agent games by learning diverse, causally informed role assignments through an entropy-based objective.
-
Hierarchical Meta-Reinforcement Learning via Automated Macro-Action Discovery
HiMeta adds a VAE-based macro-action layer between task representation and low-level policy, reporting improved MetaWorld ML10 success over SD and PEARL.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.