REVIEW 1 cited by
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Automaton-Based Representations of Task Knowledge from Generative Language Models
read the original abstract
Automaton-based representations of task knowledge play an important role in control and planning for sequential decision-making problems. However, obtaining the high-level task knowledge required to build such automata is often difficult. Meanwhile, large-scale generative language models (GLMs) can automatically generate relevant task knowledge. However, the textual outputs from GLMs cannot be formally verified or used for sequential decision-making. We propose a novel algorithm named GLM2FSA, which constructs a finite state automaton (FSA) encoding high-level task knowledge from a brief natural-language description of the task goal. GLM2FSA first sends queries to a GLM to extract task knowledge in textual form, and then it builds an FSA to represent this text-based knowledge. The proposed algorithm thus fills the gap between natural-language task descriptions and automaton-based representations, and the constructed FSA can be formally verified against user-defined specifications. We accordingly propose a method to iteratively refine the queries to the GLM based on the outcomes, e.g., counter-examples, from verification. We demonstrate GLM2FSA's ability to build and refine automaton-based representations of everyday tasks (e.g., crossing a road), and also of tasks that require highly-specialized knowledge (e.g., executing secure multi-party computation).
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiency
LLM+P lets LLMs solve planning problems optimally by converting them to PDDL for classical planners and back to natural language.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.