Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Probabilistic Model of Visual Segmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.00111 v3 pith:ZWB3GQTP submitted 2018-05-31 cs.CV q-bio.NC

classification cs.CVq-bio.NC
keywords segmentationvisualmodelhumanimagesinputsnaturalprior
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Visual segmentation is a key perceptual function that partitions visual space and allows for detection, recognition and discrimination of objects in complex environments. The processes underlying human segmentation of natural images are still poorly understood. In part, this is because we lack segmentation models consistent with experimental and theoretical knowledge in visual neuroscience. Biological sensory systems have been shown to approximate probabilistic inference to interpret their inputs. This requires a generative model that captures both the statistics of the sensory inputs and expectations about the causes of those inputs. Following this hypothesis, we propose a probabilistic generative model of visual segmentation that combines knowledge about 1) the sensitivity of neurons in the visual cortex to statistical regularities in natural images; and 2) the preference of humans to form contiguous partitions of visual space. We develop an efficient algorithm for training and inference based on expectation-maximization and validate it on synthetic data. Importantly, with the appropriate choice of the prior, we derive an intuitive closed--form update rule for assigning pixels to segments: at each iteration, the pixel assignment probabilities to segments is the sum of the evidence (i.e. local pixel statistics) and prior (i.e. the assignments of neighboring pixels) weighted by their relative uncertainty. The model performs competitively on natural images from the Berkeley Segmentation Dataset (BSD), and we illustrate how the likelihood and prior components improve segmentation relative to traditional mixture models. Furthermore, our model explains some variability across human subjects as reflecting local uncertainty about the number of segments. Our model thus provides a viable approach to probe human visual segmentation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools