Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Knowledge of cultural moral norms in large language models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.01857 v1 pith:ZWKIUAIP submitted 2023-06-02 cs.CL

Knowledge of cultural moral norms in large language models

classification cs.CL
keywords morallanguagemodelsnormsacrosscountriesenglishcultural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Moral norms vary across cultures. A recent line of work suggests that English large language models contain human-like moral biases, but these studies typically do not examine moral variation in a diverse cultural setting. We investigate the extent to which monolingual English language models contain knowledge about moral norms in different countries. We consider two levels of analysis: 1) whether language models capture fine-grained moral variation across countries over a variety of topics such as ``homosexuality'' and ``divorce''; 2) whether language models capture cultural diversity and shared tendencies in which topics people around the globe tend to diverge or agree on in their moral judgment. We perform our analyses with two public datasets from the World Values Survey (across 55 countries) and PEW global surveys (across 40 countries) on morality. We find that pre-trained English language models predict empirical moral norms across countries worse than the English moral norms reported previously. However, fine-tuning language models on the survey data improves inference across countries at the expense of a less accurate estimate of the English moral norms. We discuss the relevance and challenges of incorporating cultural knowledge into the automated inference of moral norms.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Roadmap to Pluralistic Alignment

    cs.AI 2024-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The paper formalizes three types of pluralistic AI models and three benchmark classes, arguing that current alignment techniques may reduce rather than increase distributional pluralism.

  2. Lost in Cultural Translation: Do LLMs Struggle with Math Across Cultural Contexts?

    cs.AI 2025-03 conditional novelty 5.0

    LLMs show accuracy drops of 0.3% to 5.9% on GSM8K math problems when culturally adapted to six countries while keeping math operations identical, with statistical significance confirmed by McNemar tests.

  3. Attributing Culture-Conditioned Generations to Pretraining Corpora

    cs.CL 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MEMOed framework attributes LLM generations about cultures to pretraining memorization and finds frequency-based biases across 110 cultures for food and clothing.