Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

StateFlow: Enhancing LLM Task-Solving through State-Driven Workflows

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.11322 v5 pith:ZXIKT7LT submitted 2024-03-17 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords statestateflowtask-solvingactionsllmscomplexdynamicenhancing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

It is a notable trend to use Large Language Models (LLMs) to tackle complex tasks, e.g., tasks that require a sequence of actions and dynamic interaction with tools and external environments. In this paper, we propose StateFlow, a novel LLM-based task-solving paradigm that conceptualizes complex task-solving processes as state machines. In StateFlow, we distinguish between "process grounding" (via state and state transitions) and "sub-task solving" (through actions within a state), enhancing control and interpretability of the task-solving procedure. A state represents the status of a running process. The transitions between states are controlled by heuristic rules or decisions made by the LLM, allowing for a dynamic and adaptive progression. Upon entering a state, a series of actions is executed, involving not only calling LLMs guided by different prompts, but also the utilization of external tools as needed. Our results show that StateFlow significantly enhances LLMs' efficiency. For instance, StateFlow achieves 13% and 28% higher success rates compared to ReAct in InterCode SQL and ALFWorld benchmark, with 5x and 3x less cost respectively. We also show that StateFlow can be combined with iterative refining methods like Reflexion to further improve performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LogicHunter: Testing LLM Agent Frameworks with an Agentic Oracle

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    LogicHunter combines specification-driven test generation with a ReAct-based agentic oracle to discover 40 previously unknown bugs in LangChain, LlamaIndex, and CrewAI, achieving 91.17% oracle precision.

  2. What makes prompts a graph: necessary and sufficient conditions for prompt graph engineering

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper defines prompt graph engineering via four necessary and sufficient conditions (explicit structure, structure/content separation, executable semantics, first-class artifact) and an inclusion/exclusion test th...

  3. Divide, Optimize, Merge: Fine-Grained LLM Agent Optimization at Scale

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    FGO is a divide-and-conquer framework that runs LLM-based agent optimization on dataset subsets and recursively merges the optimized prompts or tool sets into a final agent system.

  4. Memory-Augmented Agent Training for Business Document Understanding

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Matrix iteratively refines an LLM agent's memory from training trajectories and outperforms prompting and vanilla agent baselines on private UBL invoice transport-reference extraction, though gains on the released ano...

Pith tools