Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 43 references

Delayed Formation of Landau Polaritons in Phase-Resolved THz Spectroscopy

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Using phase-resolved terahertz spectroscopy, this paper shows that Landau-polariton Rabi oscillations begin only after a delay of one cavity round-trip time, not immediately after cyclotron-resonance excitation.

desk verdict A genuinely new time-domain observation of Landau polariton Rabi oscillations, but the delayed-onset claim rests on a null result in the first cavity cycle and needs a noise analysis before it is quantitative. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.29501 v2 pith:ZXSLCIWQ submitted 2026-07-31 cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph

Noureddine Charrouj , Yurii Ivonyak , Dmitriy Yavorskiy , Vladimir Y. Umansky , Jerzy Lusakowski , Wojciech Knap , Marcin Bialek This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph
keywords Landaupolaritonscyclotronresonanceterahertztime-domainspectroscopyRabioscillationsstronglight-mattercouplingFabry-Perotcavitytwo-dimensionalelectrongasFaradayrotation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a time-domain measurement of light-matter coupling in a terahertz cavity. It claims that when cyclotron resonance of a two-dimensional electron gas is strongly coupled to Fabry-Perot cavity modes, the resulting Landau polaritons exhibit Rabi oscillations whose onset is delayed by one cavity round-trip time. For the first cavity period the cyclotron-resonance signal behaves as if the cavity were absent; the periodic energy exchange between matter and light appears only after the cavity field has built up. If true, this shows directly that the strong-coupling regime is not instantaneous but forms dynamically with the standing wave.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the train of Fabry-Perot echoes: each THz pulse echo arriving at the two-dimensional electron gas excites cyclotron resonance, and the cavity round-trip time, equal to twice the time of flight through the substrate, sets the delay before the counter-propagating waves interfere into a standing mode. The Rabi beat period is extracted from $B$-field-differential traces $\partial R_x/\partial B$ in co-polarization and from nodes in cross-polarized $R_y$ traces, while the zigzag Faraday-angle pattern identifies the strong-coupling condition. The cavity round-trip time is thus the central timescale that determines when polaritonic beating can begin.

What would settle it

A measurement of the thick sample with improved signal-to-noise that resolves a Rabi-beating node within the first 9 ps, near 5.5 ps for a 22 ps Rabi period, would disprove the one-round-trip delay.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that Landau polaritons, hybrid states formed by coupling the cyclotron resonance of a two-dimensional electron gas to Fabry-Perot cavity modes, show Rabi oscillations in phase-resolved THz reflection that begin only after a delay of roughly one cavity round trip. During the first cavity period, the cyclotron-resonance signal evolves as a matter-only excitation; the periodic energy exchange with the cavity field appears only after counter-propagating waves have interfered to form the standing cavity mode. The evidence comes from magnetic-field differential traces that are nearly identical for tuned and detuned fields in the first 9 ps of the thick sample, and from an inferred first node at about 4 ps in the thin sample with a 3 ps cavity period.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion relies on reading the first 9 ps (and the extrapolated first node near 4 ps) as genuinely coupling-free; if that similarity is just limited signal-to-noise or a phase-model artifact, the delay claim fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In thick-substrate samples, the first 9 ps of the reflected signal cannot be used to infer strong coupling; coupling signatures appear only after the first echo returns.
  • The Rabi-oscillation period in the thin sample, about 9 ps, is shorter than the 22 ps period in the thick sample, consistent with smaller cavity mode volume and higher electron density.
  • The delay equal to one round trip means the formation time of a polariton is set by the cavity geometry, not by the matter oscillator alone.
  • Phase-resolved THz spectroscopy resolves the coherent energy exchange directly, so spectral splitting and time-domain beating can be compared in one experiment.
  • Faraday rotation reaching 90 degrees at polariton frequencies provides a polarization-based marker of the strong-coupling condition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the one-round-trip delay is a general rule, then shrinking the cavity should shorten the onset time in proportion; a series of substrate thicknesses would provide a direct test.
  • The delay also implies that ultrafast switching of polaritons cannot respond faster than the cavity build-up time; probes shorter than one round trip should see a matter-like response.
  • The extrapolated first node in the thin sample could be measured directly by suppressing the early echoes, for example with an anti-reflection coating, to confirm the delay without relying on inference.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports phase-resolved THz time-domain spectroscopy measurements of cyclotron resonance in a two-dimensional electron gas coupled to Fabry-Perot cavity modes. Using cross-polarized detection and magnetic-field differential traces, the authors observe temporal beating that they identify as Rabi oscillations of Landau polaritons. Their central claim is that these oscillations do not start immediately after the THz pulse excites the cyclotron resonance, but only after a delay equal to one cavity round-trip time, implying that the strong-coupling regime is dynamically established as the cavity mode field builds up. Evidence is presented for a thick (383 um) and a thin (131 um) substrate sample, supported by transfer-matrix simulations of the frequency- and time-domain response.

Significance. If the delayed-formation claim survives scrutiny, this would be a notable contribution: it would be a direct, phase-resolved observation of polariton Rabi oscillations in a Landau-polariton system and would give a concrete picture of the finite build-up time of a Fabry-Perot mode. The experimental approach—cross-polarized THz-TDS with magnetic-field differential detection—is well suited to isolating the cyclotron-resonance response, and the sign reversal of the cross-polarized signal under magnetic-field reversal convincingly identifies the cyclotron origin of that signal. The main limitation is that the delay conclusion is currently supported by a null result in a weak-signal time window and by an extrapolated node in the thin-sample data, so the strength of the claim is somewhat ahead of the evidence. The paper would be significantly strengthened by quantitative noise characterization and a direct test of the delayed-onset hypothesis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 1d and accompanying text] The inference that the first cavity cycle (t = 0–9 ps) is free of strong coupling rests on the similarity between the tuned and detuned differential traces in a time window where the manuscript itself describes the cyclotron-resonance signal as weak ('Weak CR oscillation follows the 1st peak'). Without an estimate of the noise floor, error bars on the traces, or a null-test control—for example, a sample without the back mirror, or a simulation with the coupling artificially suppressed during the first round trip—the tuned/detuned similarity could simply be a common noise floor rather than evidence for delayed coupling. Please provide a quantitative measure of agreement in the t = 0–9 ps window (e.g., residual norm compared to the noise level) and a noise-floor estimate.
  2. [Thin-sample prediction (final paragraphs before Summary)] The thin-sample evidence for the delay is not independent. The 'first node at about 4 ps' in Fig. 2a is extrapolated from the Rabi period measured from the nodes observed after 10 ps, so it cannot independently verify the delay. Moreover, the numerical reasoning is not transparent: if the observed node spacing is 9 ps, a first node near T_Rabi/4 ≈ 4.5 ps is expected even if the coupling started at t = 0, so the conclusion that the data indicate a delay 'close to the cavity period of 3 ps' does not follow from the stated numbers. A full time-domain fit with the onset time as a free parameter, comparing models with and without a delayed onset, is needed to support the claim.
  3. [Supplementary Sec. IIIC / time-domain simulation] The transfer-matrix simulation is used to support the time-domain interpretation, but the parameters are fitted to the same frequency-domain spectra that establish the strong coupling. It is therefore important to state explicitly whether the delayed onset in the simulated time-domain traces is an input or an emergent output of the linear-response model. If it is an emergent output, the simulation should be shown to reproduce the first-cycle null without added assumptions; if the delay is imposed, the simulation cannot serve as independent confirmation. Please report the fitted parameter values with uncertainties and show the simulated traces on the same t = 0–10 ps scale as the data.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 1d] The labels 'CR tunned' and 'CR detunned' should be 'tuned' and 'detuned'; also 'time scale tics' should be 'time scale ticks'.
  2. [Text near Eq. (1)] The scaling formula 'The Rabi splitting scales as d p N fm/Vm [1]' contains a formatting artifact and should be typeset as a proper equation with definitions of the symbols.
  3. [Sample parameters] The electron density and mobility values are typeset with missing superscripts ('ns ∼3×10 11 cm−2' and 'µ >10 5 cm2/Vs'); please correct the exponent formatting.
  4. [References] Reference [2] contains an unformatted URL line break in the citation text; please ensure the bibliographic entry is clean.
  5. [Fig. 2e/f] The color scale and position axes for the simulated electric-field distributions are not defined in the caption; please specify the color mapping and the meaning of the vertical axis.
  6. [Supplemental material] The text repeatedly refers to Supplemental Material sections (Sec. IIB, IIIC, IV, V) without giving a preview of their content in the main text; please ensure the supplement is complete and archived.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Thin-sample 'prediction' of the first Rabi node is back-calculated from the measured period, so the delayed-formation claim partly reduces to a fitted input.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 'Thin-substrate sample', paragraph after Fig. 2a (final paragraph before Summary).]
    "Based on the Rabi oscillations period as determined in Fig. 2a, we predict that the first node of the Rabi oscillations is at about 4 ps, as marked with a small black arrow. That time is after the initial excitation of the CR by the THz pulse at about 0 ps. This indicates that, also in the thin-substrate sample, the light-matter coupling is established after a time offset that is close to the cavity period of 3 ps."

    The 'predicted' first node is not measured or independently predicted; it is computed from the Rabi period measured later in the same trace (the 9 ps spacing of observed nodes after 10 ps). The t < 10 ps window is explicitly dominated by THz echoes, so the node at about 4 ps is unobservable. The back-extrapolation assumes the Rabi envelope is periodic from t = 0 with the same period and phase as the later nodes, which is exactly the assumption a delay would alter. Using this back-calculated node to infer a delay of about 3 ps reduces to 'the measured period implies a half-period node at about 4 ps', a restatement of the fitted period, not a test of when coupling starts. No independent fit with a delay parameter is presented.

full rationale

The thick-sample evidence for delayed formation is a null result: tuned and detuned ∂R_x/∂B traces are similar during the first 9 ps cavity cycle. That is an observation, not a definitional circularity, but its interpretation depends on the CR burst being above the noise floor, and the paper itself notes the CR oscillation after the first peak is weak. The thin-sample evidence, however, is partially circular: the 'predicted' first node at 4 ps is obtained by taking one half-period back from the observed nodes, using the Rabi period measured in the same trace, and then this extrapolated node is used to support the claim that coupling starts after about one cavity round-trip. That step is a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The transfer-matrix time-domain simulation is a consistency check rather than an independent test because its parameters are fitted to the same frequency-domain spectra, but the paper does not rely on it as the central proof, so it is not scored as a separate circular step. No load-bearing self-citations, imported uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling were found. Overall, the delay claim has independent thick-sample content but is partly circular in the thin-sample argument, giving a moderate score.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim does not introduce new entities. It relies on measured sample parameters, a fitted transfer-matrix model, and the assumption that null signal in the first cavity cycle reflects delayed formation rather than limited sensitivity.

free parameters (2)
  • Transfer-matrix model parameters (2DEG conductivity, scattering rate, oscillator strengths) = Not stated
    The paper says time-domain traces are simulated from 'these fitted frequency-domain spectra' (Sec. IIIC), so the model parameters are fitted to the Faraday rotation spectra before being propagated into time domain.
  • Rabi oscillation period used to predict the first node in the thin sample = 9 ps (period measured from observed minima)
    The 'predicted' first node at about 4 ps is computed from the measured Rabi period, not from an independent theoretical derivation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Linear response and transfer-matrix electrodynamics describe the THz interaction of the 2DEG and the Fabry-Perot cavity.
    The interpretation and the simulation both rely on the sample being described by a transfer-matrix model, with the 2DEG treated as a thin conductive sheet.
  • domain assumption The cross-polarized signal R_y originates solely from cyclotron-resonance emission and is free of polarization leakage from the echoes.
    This is validated by B-field sign reversal, but the first-cavity-cycle absence of Rabi nodes is judged relative to this signal's noise floor.
  • ad hoc to paper Similarity of tuned and detuned traces in the first cavity cycle is interpreted as absence of strong-coupling feedback, not as weak signal.
    The paper notes the CR response after the first pulse is weak, and no quantitative criterion is given for 'similar'.
  • domain assumption The spectral zigzag pattern is evidence of strong coupling, so the temporal beating is assigned to Rabi oscillations.
    The identification of the 9 ps beat as Rabi oscillations relies on the frequency-domain anticrossing and transfer-matrix fits.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Delayed Formation of Landau Polaritons in Phase-Resolved THz Spectroscopy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZXSLCIWQ

@misc{pith2026260729501,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Delayed Formation of Landau Polaritons in Phase-Resolved THz Spectroscopy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZXSLCIWQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.29501}
}
abstract

Strong light-matter coupling gives rise to polaritons through coherent and periodic energy exchange between electromagnetic cavity fields and material excitations. While this interaction is typically inferred from spectral mode splitting, its dynamics remain largely unexplored. Here, using phase-resolved terahertz time-domain spectroscopy, we observe Rabi oscillations of Landau polaritons formed by coupling the cyclotron resonance in a GaAs/Al$_{0.36}$Ga$_{0.64}$As two-dimensional electron gas with Fabry-Perot cavity modes. By employing cross-polarized spectroscopy and magnetic-field differential, we resolve the temporal beating of the cyclotron resonance oscillations. Remarkably, we find that the Rabi oscillations do not start immediately after excitation of the cyclotron resonance, but after a delay corresponding to one cavity round-trip time. This demonstrates that the strong-coupling regime sets up only after the formation of the cavity mode field. Our results provide direct insight into the dynamics of hybrid light-matter states in the THz regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.29501 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Sample with thick substrate. In the segments (a), (b), and (d), the time scale is the same; the gray, yellow, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Thin-substrate sample in cross-polarized measurements. (a) Time-domain traces of reflection spectra at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Khitrova, H

    G. Khitrova, H. M. Gibbs, M. Kira, S. W. Koch, and A. Scherer, Vacuum rabi splitting in semiconductors, Na- ture Physics2, 81 (2006)

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    Basov, A

    D. Basov, A. Asenjo-Garcia, P. J. Schuck, X. Zhu, A. Rubio, A. Cavalleri, M. Delor, M. M. Fogler, and M. Liu, Polaritonic quan- tum matter, Nanophotonics14, 3723 (2025), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1515/nanoph- 2025-0001

    doi:10.1515/nanoph- 2025

  3. [3]

    Frisk Kockum, A

    A. Frisk Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter, Nature Reviews Physics1, 19 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    D. D. Solnyshkov, G. Malpuech, P. St-Jean, S. Ravets, J. Bloch, and A. Amo, Microcavity polaritons for topo- logical photonics, Opt. Mater. Express11, 1119 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Xiang and W

    B. Xiang and W. Xiong, Molecular polaritons for chem- istry, photonics and quantum technologies, Chemical Re- views124, 2512 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Baydin, H

    A. Baydin, H. Zhu, M. Bamba, K. R. A. Hazzard, and J. Kono, Perspective on the quantum vacuum in matter, Opt. Mater. Express15, 1833 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Yahiaoui, Z

    R. Yahiaoui, Z. A. Chase, C. Kyaw, F. Tay, A. Baydin, G. T. Noe, J. Song, J. Kono, A. Agrawal, M. Bamba, and T. A. Searles, Dicke-cooperativity-assisted ultrastrong coupling enhancement in terahertz metasurfaces, Nano Letters22, 9788 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Forn-D ´ ıaz, L

    P. Forn-D ´ ıaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico, J. Kono, and E. Solano, Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 025005 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Weisbuch, M

    C. Weisbuch, M. Nishioka, A. Ishikawa, and Y. Arakawa, Observation of the coupled exciton-photon mode split- ting in a semiconductor quantum microcavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 3314 (1992)

    1992

  2. [10]

    Yoshie, A

    T. Yoshie, A. Scherer, J. Hendrickson, G. Khitrova, H. M. Gibbs, G. Rupper, C. Ell, O. B. Shchekin, and D. G. Deppe, Vacuum rabi splitting with a single quantum dot in a photonic crystal nanocavity, Nature432, 200 (2004)

    2004

  3. [11]

    Johansson, S

    J. Johansson, S. Saito, T. Meno, H. Nakano, M. Ueda, K. Semba, and H. Takayanagi, Vacuum rabi oscillations in a macroscopic superconducting qubitlcoscillator sys- tem, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 127006 (2006)

    2006

  4. [12]

    Dominici, D

    L. Dominici, D. Colas, S. Donati, J. P. Restrepo Cuar- tas, M. De Giorgi, D. Ballarini, G. Guirales, J. C. L´ opez Carre˜ no, A. Bramati, G. Gigli, E. del Valle, F. P. Laussy, and D. Sanvitto, Ultrafast control and rabi oscillations of polaritons, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 226401 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    Zhang, C.-L

    X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Strongly coupled magnons and cavity microwave photons, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 156401 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    A. D. Dunkelberger, B. T. Spann, K. P. Fears, B. S. Simp- kins, and J. C. Owrutsky, Modified relaxation dynamics and coherent energy exchange in coupled vibration-cavity polaritons, Nature Communications7, 13504 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    R. E. F. Silva, J. d. Pino, F. J. Garc ´ ıa-Vidal, and J. Feist, Polaritonic molecular clock for all-optical ultrafast imag- ing of wavepacket dynamics without probe pulses, Nature Communications11, 1423 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    T. G. H. Blank, K. A. Grishunin, and A. V. Kimel, Magneto-optical detection of terahertz cavity magnon- polaritons in antiferromagnetic HoFeO3, Applied Physics Letters122, 072402 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    G. Jarc, S. Y. Mathengattil, F. Giusti, M. Barnaba, A. Singh, A. Montanaro, F. Glerean, E. M. Rigoni, S. D. Zilio, S. Winnerl, and D. Fausti, Tunable cryogenic tera- hertz cavity for strong light–matter coupling in complex materials, Review of Scientific Instruments93, 033102 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    H. S. Kim, A. A. Khan, J.-Y. Park, S. Lee, and Y. H. Ahn, Mechanical control of polaritonic states in lead halide perovskite phonons strongly coupled in thz micro- cavity, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters14, 10318 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Bia lek, Y

    M. Bia lek, Y. Todorov, K. Stelmaszczyk, D. Szwagier- czak, B. Synkiewicz-Musialska, J. Kulawik, N. Pa lka, M. Potemski, and W. Knap, Hybridization of tera- hertz phonons and magnons in disparate and spatially- separated material specimens, Advanced Functional Ma- terials35, 2...

    2025

  12. [20]

    Huebl, C

    H. Huebl, C. W. Zollitsch, J. Lotze, F. Hocke, M. Greifen- stein, A. Marx, R. Gross, and S. T. B. Goennenwein, High cooperativity in coupled microwave resonator ferri- magnetic insulator hybrids, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 127003 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, A. Noguchi, T. Ishikawa, R. Ya- mazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Coherent coupling between a ferromagnetic magnon and a superconducting qubit, Science349, 405 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    L. Bai, M. Harder, Y. P. Chen, X. Fan, J. Q. Xiao, and C.-M. Hu, Spin pumping in electrodynamically coupled magnon-photon systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 227201 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    Bia lek, J

    M. Bia lek, J. Zhang, H. Yu, and J.-P. Ansermet, Strong coupling of antiferromagnetic resonance with subtera- hertz cavity fields, Phys. Rev. Appl.15, 044018 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    T. E. Kritzell, A. Baydin, F. Tay, R. Rodriguez, J. Doumani, H. Nojiri, H. O. Everitt, I. Barsukov, and J. Kono, Terahertz cavity magnon polaritons, Advanced Optical Materials12, 2302270 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    D. Dini, R. K¨ ohler, A. Tredicucci, G. Biasiol, and L. Sorba, Microcavity polariton splitting of intersubband transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 116401 (2003)

    2003

  18. [26]

    Jeannin, G

    M. Jeannin, G. Mariotti Nesurini, S. Suffit, D. Gacemi, A. Vasanelli, L. Li, A. G. Davies, E. Linfield, C. Sir- tori, and Y. Todorov, Ultrastrong light–matter coupling in deeply subwavelength thz lc resonators, ACS Photon- ics6, 1207 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Geiser, F

    M. Geiser, F. Castellano, G. Scalari, M. Beck, L. Nevou, and J. Faist, Ultrastrong coupling regime and plasmon polaritons in parabolic semiconductor quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 106402 (2012)

    2012

  20. [28]

    G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, G. Scalari, F. Valmorra, J. Keller, C. Maissen, M. Beck, and J. Faist, Gate and magnetic field tunable ultrastrong coupling between a magnetoplasmon and the optical mode of an lc cavity, Phys. Rev. B95, 205304 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Zhang, T

    Q. Zhang, T. Arikawa, E. Kato, J. L. Reno, W. Pan, J. D. Watson, M. J. Manfra, M. A. Zudov, M. Tokman, M. Erukhimova, A. Belyanin, and J. Kono, Superradiant decay of cyclotron resonance of two-dimensional electron gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 047601 (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    V. M. Muravev, I. V. Andreev, N. D. Semenov, I. V. Kukushkin, and V. Umansky, Purcell effect for cyclotron 6 resonance in a two-dimensional electron system, Phys. Rev. B111, 155431 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    Scalari, C

    G. Scalari, C. Maissen, D. Turˇ cinkov´ a, D. Hagenm¨ uller, S. D. Liberato, C. Ciuti, C. Reichl, D. Schuh, W. Wegscheider, M. Beck, and J. Faist, Ultrastrong cou- pling of the cyclotron transition of a 2d electron gas to a thz metamaterial, Science335, 1323 (2012)

    2012

  24. [32]

    Scalari, C

    G. Scalari, C. Maissen, D. Hagenm¨ uller, S. De Liberato, C. Ciuti, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, D. Schuh, M. Beck, and J. Faist, Ultrastrong light-matter coupling at ter- ahertz frequencies with split ring resonators and inter- landau level transitions, Journal of Applied Physi...

    2013

  25. [33]

    Rajabali, E

    S. Rajabali, E. Cortese, M. Beck, S. De Liberato, J. Faist, and G. Scalari, Polaritonic nonlocality in light–matter interaction, Nature Photonics15, 690 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Mornhinweg, L

    J. Mornhinweg, L. K. Diebel, M. Halbhuber, M. Prager, J. Riepl, T. Inzenhofer, D. Bougeard, R. Huber, and C. Lange, Mode-multiplexing deep-strong light-matter coupling, Nature Communications15, 1847 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    V. M. Muravev, I. V. Andreev, I. V. Kukushkin, S. Sch- mult, and W. Dietsche, Observation of hybrid plasmon- photon modes in microwave transmission of coplanar mi- croresonators, Phys. Rev. B83, 075309 (2011)

    2011

  28. [36]

    Zhang, M

    Q. Zhang, M. Lou, X. Li, J. L. Reno, W. Pan, J. D. Watson, M. J. Manfra, and J. Kono, Collective non- perturbative coupling of 2d electrons with high-quality- factor terahertz cavity photons, Nature Physics12, 1005 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    X. Li, M. Bamba, Q. Zhang, S. Fallahi, G. C. Gard- ner, W. Gao, M. Lou, K. Yoshioka, M. J. Manfra, and J. Kono, Vacuum Bloch–Siegert shift in Landau polari- tons with ultra-high cooperativity, Nature Photonics12, 324 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    Shuvaev, V

    A. Shuvaev, V. M. Muravev, P. A. Gusikhin, J. Gospo- dariˇ c, A. Pimenov, and I. V. Kukushkin, Discovery of two-dimensional electromagnetic plasma waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 136801 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    F. Tay, S. Sanders, A. Baydin, Z. Song, D. M. Welakuh, A. Alabastri, V. Rokaj, C. B. Dag, and J. Kono, Tera- hertz chiral photonic-crystal cavities for dirac gap engi- neering in graphene, Nature Communications16, 5270 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    Mavrona, S

    E. Mavrona, S. Rajabali, F. Appugliese, J. Andberger, M. Beck, G. Scalari, and J. Faist, THz Ultrastrong Cou- pling in an Engineered Fabry–Perot Cavity, ACS Pho- tonics8, 2692 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    J¨ ochl, A.-L

    E. J¨ ochl, A.-L. Vieli, L. Hale, F. Helmrich, D. Turan, M. Jarrahi, M. Beck, J. Faist, and G. Scalari, Gate- tunable single terahertz meta-atom ultrastrong light- matter coupling, ACS Photonics13, 1122–1128 (2026)

    2026

  34. [42]

    Andberger, L

    J. Andberger, L. Graziotto, L. Sacchi, M. Beck, G. Scalari, and J. Faist, Terahertz chiral subwavelength cavities breaking time-reversal symmetry via ultrastrong light-matter interaction, Phys. Rev. B109, L161302 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Suresh, T

    V. Suresh, T. J. Martz-Oberlander, S. Vijayakrishnan, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, G. Gervais, B. Reulet, and T. Szkopek, Total faraday rotation by the hall effect in a 2d electron gas (2025), arXiv:2509.05819 [cond-mat.mes- hall]

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.