REVIEW 3 cited by
Complex Langevin and other approaches to the sign problem in quantum many-body physics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Complex Langevin and other approaches to the sign problem in quantum many-body physics
read the original abstract
We review the theory and applications of complex stochastic quantization to the quantum many-body problem. Along the way, we present a brief overview of a number of ideas that either ameliorate or in some cases altogether solve the sign problem, including the classic reweighting method, alternative Hubbard-Stratonovich transformations, dual variables (for bosons and fermions), Majorana fermions, density-of-states methods, imaginary asymmetry approaches, and Lefschetz thimbles. We discuss some aspects of the mathematical underpinnings of conventional stochastic quantization, provide a few pedagogical examples, and summarize open challenges and practical solutions for the complex case. Finally, we review the recent applications of complex Langevin to quantum field theory in relativistic and nonrelativistic quantum matter, with an emphasis on the nonrelativistic case.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Stochastic Quantization as Optimal Control
Stochastic quantization is re-expressed as finite-time optimal control, in which a learned Doob force plus exact path weights reach the Gibbs measure without waiting for equilibrium.
-
Finite-density equation of state of hot QCD using the complex Langevin equation
Continuum-extrapolated lattice QCD simulations with complex Langevin produce the equation of state at high baryon chemical potentials above the crossover temperature at the physical point.
-
Correctness criteria for complex Langevin
A comparison of prominent correctness criteria for complex Langevin dynamics on four simple models shows differences in applicability, ease of use, and predictive power.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.