Pith.

Astrophysics · arXiv:astro-ph/0407101 v1 · submitted 6 Jul 2004

Compilation and R-matrix analysis of Big Bang nuclear reaction rates

Pierre Descouvemont, Abderrahim Adahchour, Carmen Angulo, Alain Coc, Elisabeth Vangioni-Flam

The paper says

“We provide S factors and reaction rates in tabular and graphical formats.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We use the R-matrix theory to fit low-energy data on nuclear reactions involved in Big Bang nucleosynthesis. A special attention is paid to the rate uncertainties which are evaluated on statistical grounds. We provide S factors and reaction rates in tabular and graphical formats.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.15 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.10 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.20

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We use the R-matrix theory to fit low-energy data on nuclear reactions involved in Big Bang nucleosynthesis. method 0.91 0.94 0.11 asserted 1.00
A special attention is paid to the rate uncertainties which are evaluated on statistical grounds. method 0.87 0.87 0.08 asserted 0.98
We provide S factors and reaction rates in tabular and graphical formats. contribution 0.60 0.92 0.15 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: dataset or benchmark 0.72 · evidence from analysis of existing data 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,820 input tokens.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 15 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

24 arXiv papers cite this in 25 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 15 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 4 papers
Uses its data or values 2 papers
  • These updates included updated reaction rates from NACRE-II [ref] , REACLIB [ref] , and Descouvemont [ref] for a myriad of reactions, including many of the 12 major reactions and auxiliary reactions involved in BBN.

    Revised Uncertainties in Big Bang Nucleosynthesis · Methodology · 0.91

  • For all important SBBN reactions (i.e. up to A=7) we employ the results of [ref] with the exceptions of the $n(p,γ)$ and $(α,γ)$ reactions for which we follow [ref] and [ref] , respectively.

    Big Bang Nucleosynthesis as a Probe of New Physics · Universe at redshift of a billion: basic assumptions and main stages of BBN · 0.92

Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 3 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment