Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The Radial Distribution of Galaxies in LCDM clusters

Astrophysics · Submitted 14 Aug 2004

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Using the simulations that include cooling and starformation, we show that the radial distribution of subhalos is in reasonable agreement with the observed radial distribution of galaxies in clusters for 0.1<R/R200<2.0, if subhalos are selected using the stellar mass of galaxies.

how it is stated · asserted 0.98 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDastro-ph/0408273 (version 1)
Pith ID7WMF7X7O, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAndrey V. Kravtsov (KICP, Daisuke Nagai, U.Chicago). "The Radial Distribution of Galaxies in LCDM clusters." arXiv:astro-ph/0408273 (2004). https://pith.science/paper/7WMF7X7O
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,318 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.73 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.27 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.95 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study the radial distribution of subhalos and galaxies using high-resolution cosmological simulations of galaxy clusters formed in the concordance LCDM cosmology. In agreement with previous studies, we find that the radial distribution of subhalos is significantly less concentrated than that of the dark matter, when subhalos are selected using their present-day gravitationally bound mass. We show that the difference in the radial distribution is not a numerical artifact and is due to tidal stripping. The subhalos in the cluster core lose more than 70% of their initial mass since accretion, while the average tidal mass loss for halos near the virial radius is ~30%. This introduces a radial bias in the spatial distribution of subhalos when they are selected using their tidally truncated mass. We demonstrate that the radial bias disappears almost entirely if subhalos are selected using their mass or circular velocity at the accretion epoch. The comparisons of the results of dissipationless simulations to the observed distribution of galaxies in clusters are therefore sensitive to the selection criteria used to select subhalo samples. Using the simulations that include cooling and starformation, we show that the radial distribution of subhalos is in reasonable agreement with the observed radial distribution of galaxies in clusters for 0.1<R/R200<2.0, if subhalos are selected using the stellar mass of galaxies. The radial bias is minimized in this case because the stars are located in the centers of dark matter subhalos and are tightly bound. The stellar mass of an object is therefore approximately conserved as the dark matter is stripped from the outer regions. Nevertheless, the concentration of the radial distribution of galaxies is systematically lower than that of the dark matter.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study the radial distribution of subhalos and galaxies using high-resolution cosmological simulations of galaxy clusters formed in the concordance LCDM cosmology. contribution 0.80 0.93 0.04 asserted 0.84
s1 In agreement with previous studies, we find that the radial distribution of subhalos is significantly less concentrated than that of the dark matter, when subhalos are selected using their present-day gravitationally bound mass. result 1.00 0.91 0.19 asserted 1.00
s2 We show that the difference in the radial distribution is not a numerical artifact and is due to tidal stripping. interpretation 0.71 0.92 0.16 asserted 1.00
s3 The subhalos in the cluster core lose more than 70% of their initial mass since accretion, while the average tidal mass loss for halos near the virial radius is ~30%. result 1.00 0.93 0.08 asserted 1.00
s4 This introduces a radial bias in the spatial distribution of subhalos when they are selected using their tidally truncated mass. result 0.59 0.86 0.14 asserted 1.00
s5 We demonstrate that the radial bias disappears almost entirely if subhalos are selected using their mass or circular velocity at the accretion epoch. result 0.98 0.95 0.20 asserted 1.00
s6 The comparisons of the results of dissipationless simulations to the observed distribution of galaxies in clusters are therefore sensitive to the selection criteria used to select subhalo samples. interpretation 0.97 0.51 0.25 asserted 0.80
s7 Using the simulations that include cooling and starformation, we show that the radial distribution of subhalos is in reasonable agreement with the observed radial distribution of galaxies in clusters for 0.1<R/R200<2.0, if subhalos are selected using the stellar mass of galaxies. result 0.96 0.96 0.41 asserted 0.98
s8 The radial bias is minimized in this case because the stars are located in the centers of dark matter subhalos and are tightly bound. interpretation 0.94 0.83 0.09 asserted 1.00
s9 The stellar mass of an object is therefore approximately conserved as the dark matter is stripped from the outer regions. interpretation 0.88 0.69 0.08 asserted 0.97
s10 Nevertheless, the concentration of the radial distribution of galaxies is systematically lower than that of the dark matter. result 0.97 0.89 0.28 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study the radial distribution of subhalos and galaxies using high-resolution cosmological simulations of galaxy clusters formed in the concordance LCDM cosmology. In agreement with previous studies, we find that the radial distribution of subhalos is significantly less concentrated than that of the dark matter, when subhalos are selected using their present-day gravitationally bound mass. We show that the difference in the radial distribution is not a numerical artifact and is due to tidal stripping. The subhalos in the cluster core lose more than 70% of their initial mass since accretion, while the average tidal mass loss for halos near the virial radius is ~30%. This introduces a radial bias in the spatial distribution of subhalos when they are selected using their tidally truncated mass. We demonstrate that the radial bias disappears almost entirely if subhalos are selected using their mass or circular velocity at the accretion epoch. The comparisons of the results of dissipationless simulations to the observed distribution of galaxies in clusters are therefore sensitive to the selection criteria used to select subhalo samples. Using the simulations that include cooling and starformation, we show that the radial distribution of subhalos is in reasonable agreement with the observed radial distribution of galaxies in clusters for 0.1<R/R200<2.0, if subhalos are selected using the stellar mass of galaxies. The radial bias is minimized in this case because the stars are located in the centers of dark matter subhalos and are tightly bound. The stellar mass of an object is therefore approximately conserved as the dark matter is stripped from the outer regions. Nevertheless, the concentration of the radial distribution of galaxies is systematically lower than that of the dark matter.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

8 arXiv papers cite this in 9 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 7 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as support 1 paper
  • The latter model takes into account the effect of gravitational tidal disruption of subhalos that is stronger and reduces the number of subhalos towards the central regions of the halo, and indeed is more likely to be the case according to numerical simulations [ref] (see also Refs. [ref] ).

    Gamma-ray background anisotropy from galactic dark matter substructure · Models · 1.00

Cites it as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.