Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Self-Calibration of Cluster Dark Energy Studies: Observable-Mass Distribution

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0503363 v1 pith:MQSM5BH3 submitted 2005-03-16 astro-ph

Self-Calibration of Cluster Dark Energy Studies: Observable-Mass Distribution

classification astro-ph
keywords distributionmassdarkenergyclusterconstraintscountsfunction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The exponential sensitivity of cluster number counts to the properties of the dark energy implies a comparable sensitivity to not only the mean but also the actual_distribution_ of an observable mass proxy given the true cluster mass. For example a 25% scatter in mass can provide a ~50% change in the number counts at z~2 for the upcoming SPT survey. Uncertainty in the scatter of this amount would degrade dark energy constraints to uninteresting levels. Given the shape of the actual mass function, the properties of the distribution may be internally monitored by the shape of the_observable_ mass function. An arbitrary evolution of the scatter of a mass-independent Gaussian distribution may be self-calibrated to allow a measurement of the dark energy equation of state of Delta w ~0.1. External constraints on the mass_variance_ of the distribution that are more accurate than Delta var < 0.01 at z~1 can further improve constraints by up to a factor of 2. More generally, cluster counts and their sample variance measured as a function of the observable provide internal consistency checks on the assumed form of the observable-mass distribution that will protect against misinterpretation of the dark energy constraints.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Statistics Meet Systematics: Resolution of the Massive Early JWST Galaxy Tension

    astro-ph.GA 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0

    Systematic uncertainties in JWST stellar-mass estimates, amplified by Eddington bias, resolve the apparent requirement for unphysically high star-formation efficiencies in massive high-redshift galaxies.