Astrophysics · arXiv:astro-ph/9707036 v3 · submitted 2 Jul 1997
Are ultrahigh energy cosmic rays signals of supersymmetry?
The paper says
“The range of the S^0 through the cosmic background radiation is significantly longer than the range of nucleons, and therefore can originate from sources at cosmoglogical distances.”
from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier
Reviews
Reviews by people
No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.
The paper
Abstract
We investigate the possibility that cosmic rays of energy larger than the Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin cutoff are not nucleons, but a new stable, massive, hadron that appears in many extensions of the standard model. We focus primarily on the S^0, a uds-gluino bound state. The range of the S^0 through the cosmic background radiation is significantly longer than the range of nucleons, and therefore can originate from sources at cosmoglogical distances.
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.98
What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.14 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.26 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.29 · mentions code or data availability 0.02
The abstract, sentence by sentence
This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v3). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.
| Sentence | Role | The authors' own work | States the main conclusion | Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| We investigate the possibility that cosmic rays of energy larger than the Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin cutoff are not nucleons, but a new stable, massive, hadron that appears in many extensions of the standard model. | contribution 0.96 | 0.46 | 0.17 | hedged possibility 0.90 |
| We focus primarily on the S^0, a uds-gluino bound state. | contribution 0.96 | 0.45 | 0.06 | asserted 0.87 |
| The range of the S^0 through the cosmic background radiation is significantly longer than the range of nucleons, and therefore can originate from sources at cosmoglogical distances. | result 0.78 | 0.57 | 0.34 | asserted 0.98 |
What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.90 · evidence from argument 0.88
What was examined, and what was not
Sources read
- arXiv listing abstract v3
Not examined
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
Levels run
- P abstract
Not run
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
How the labels were made
Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,955 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.
Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON
Cited by 3 Pith papers
Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record
- Signatures of long-lived gluinos in split supersymmetry hep-ph · Aug 2004
- Matter Creation via Vacuum Fluctuations in the Early Universe and Observed Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Ray Events hep-ph · Sep 1998
- Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays, Superheavy Long-Living Particles, and Matter Creation after Inflation hep-ph · Feb 1998
How the literature uses it
2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences
Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label
Compares with it 1 paper
-
The parameter $ξ$ plays the role of the inelasticity parameter which was found in Refs. [ref] to be similarly tiny for collisions of protons with some hypothetical very massive colour-singlet particles.
Monopoles and Fermions in the Standard Model · Processes initiated by quarks · 0.84
Challenges and discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.
Come back by email
A short list of the week's newly reviewed papers. Nothing is sent until you confirm from your inbox, and every email has a link that stops it. No account.
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment