Relativistic second-order perturbations of the Einstein-de Sitter Universe

M. Bruni; S. Matarrese; S. Mollerach

REVIEW

Relativistic second-order perturbations of the Einstein-de Sitter Universe

S. Matarrese, S. Mollerach, M. Bruni

Astrophysics · Submitted 25 Jul 1997 · 40 references

Pith's verdict: A careful, standard-reference derivation: the new content is the explicit second-order synchronous-to-Poisson gauge transformation and the Poisson-gauge expressions, and it holds up.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on October 29, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 5 major objections · 6 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDastro-ph/9707278 (version 2)

Pith IDMUEPKK6F, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationM. Bruni, S. Matarrese, S. Mollerach. "Relativistic second-order perturbations of the Einstein-de Sitter Universe." arXiv:astro-ph/9707278 (1997). https://pith.science/paper/MUEPKK6F

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

The thing to know up front: the genuinely new content is the second-order gauge transformation between synchronous and Poisson gauges (Eqs. 5.8–5.14) and the resulting Poisson-gauge expressions for the metric, density, and velocity (Eqs. 6.8, 6.10–6.12). The synchronous-gauge second-order results in Section IV largely reproduce Tomita (1967) and Matarrese–Pantano–Sáez (1994), and the authors say so plainly in Section I. That honesty is worth noting, because it is easy to oversell this kind of calculation and they don't. The claim in Section VI that all the second-order Poisson-gauge expressions are new looks right to me; I don't know of earlier explicit forms at this order in that gauge. What it does well: the linear sector is internally consistent. Eq. 4.22 and Eq. 4.24 follow from the constraint 4.14 with the growing-mode solution 4.20, and the tau^4 and tau^2 growing pieces in 4.31 match the known synchronous-gauge results. The transformation machinery is taken from their own Ref. [15], which is published in Classical and Quantum Gravity, so that is a legitimate foundation rather than a gap. The mode-mixing story (abstract:s5) is real and correctly hedged: Section VII notes that tensor modes are not gauge-invariant beyond linear order, which is the right caveat and one that later papers have sometimes forgotten. Soft spots, in proportion: the scope is narrow. Exact Einstein–de Sitter, irrotational dust, growing scalar mode plus linear tensors only, initial conditions at tau_0 = 0. They state all of this in Sections IV.B and IV.C, so it is a scope limit rather than a hidden assumption, but it does mean the explicit coefficients are not general. There is no independent numerical cross-check of the second-order coefficients, which for a paper this computational is a real if forgivable gap; a numerical integration of Eqs. 4.27–4.30 would have been cheap insurance. One mechanical thing worth checking: Eq. 6.10 has a term -6 tau alpha^(2)(t), but the transformation rule (3.29) with rho_0 proportional to tau^-6 gives -6 alpha^(2)(t)/tau. That looks like a typo. It does not touch the central claim, but it should be fixed. Ref. [33] is cited as in press for the tensor-mode interpretation, which is the one place a reader cannot check. Who it is for: anyone doing second-order relativistic perturbation theory, secondary CMB anisotropies, or relativistic non-linear structure formation. It is a methods paper and it has been used as one. Recommendation: yes, send it out. It is a careful derivation with an honest account of what is new, and the Poisson-gauge results are the part that mattered.

Referee report

Significance

This is a foundational calculation in relativistic cosmological perturbation theory, and the explicit second-order Poisson-gauge expressions are genuinely new. The second-order gauge-transformation machinery, built on Bruni et al. (1997), is a technical contribution in its own right, and the mode-mixing results bear directly on secondary CMB anisotropies and on the stochastic gravitational-wave background of secondary origin. I performed several independent internal checks that substantially raise my confidence in the framework: the linear sector (Eqs. 4.14–4.24 and 6.1–6.5) is fully consistent, including the first-order transformation ψ(1)P = φ(1)P = φ and δ(1)P = −2φ + (τ²/6)∇²φ; Eq. 4.39 agrees exactly with Eq. 4.31 and Eq. B6 at both τ⁴ and τ² orders; the source Sij of Eqs. 4.35–4.36 is transverse and traceless; Eq. 4.37 satisfies Eq. 4.34; and Eq. 4.32 is the correct Green's-function solution of the Raychaudhuri equation. The τ⁴ bracket of Eq. 6.10 also reproduces the standard Eulerian kernels 5/7 and 2/7 once the extra 14φ,i∇²φ,i term is traced to the ξi(1)δρ,i piece of Eq. 3.29.

Major objections (5)

[Section VI, Eq. 6.10] The last term of Eq. 6.10 reads −6τ α(2)(t), but this is dimensionally inconsistent: α(2) has dimension of conformal time (see Eq. 6.6 and Eq. D1), so τ α(2) has dimension length², whereas δ(2) is dimensionless. Eq. 3.29 with ρ(0) ∝ τ⁻⁶ gives (ρ′(0)/ρ(0))α(2) = −6α(2)/τ, which is dimensionless. The term should presumably read −6α(2)(t)/τ. Please correct or clarify.
[Section VI, Eq. 6.10] I was able to reproduce the τ⁰ and τ⁴ coefficients of Eq. 6.10 by applying Eq. 3.29 to Eq. 4.39 with α(2) from Eq. 6.6, but not the τ² coefficients. My computation gives τ²[(1/12)φ,iφ,i + (4/3)φ∇²φ + (4/7)Ψ0 − (1/6)φ,ijχ⊤ij], whereas the manuscript has τ²[−(7/12)φ,iφ,i + (2/3)φ∇²φ + (4/7)Ψ0 − (1/6)φ,ijχ⊤ij]. The difference is −(1/3)∇²(φ²). Since Eq. 4.39 is confirmed by Eq. 4.31 and Eq. B6, and the τ⁰ and τ⁴ pieces of Eq. 6.10 check out, please verify the τ² coefficients or state the residual-gauge fixing that accounts for the difference.
[Section IV.C and Appendix C] The tensor-mode contribution χ(2)S(t)ij is not given explicitly; the text states only that its expression 'can be derived from the equations given in Appendix C.' Similarly, Appendix D gives the equations for the tensor contributions to the Poisson-gauge metric but not their solutions. Since the paper's stated aim is a complete account, please state explicitly whether these are left implicit by design or give the integrated expressions.
[Section V, Eqs. 5.12–5.14] These are elliptic equations for β(2), d(2)i, and α(2). Solvability requires compatibility conditions: the right-hand side of the ∇²∇²β(2) equation must have zero mean (and be orthogonal to harmonic functions), and the right-hand side of the ∇²d(2)i equation must be transverse. The paper asserts that the system 'can be solved' without verifying these conditions. Please add a sentence confirming that they hold by construction, or note the projection used.
[Section VII and Eq. 4.39] The density perturbation generated by tensor modes enters Eq. 4.39 only through the local term (1/4)(χ⊤ijχ⊤ij − χ⊤0ijχ⊤0ij) and through (3/2)φ(2)S(t). Since χ⊤ oscillates and decays inside the horizon (Eq. 4.13), this induced density perturbation does not exhibit the τ² growing mode. The scenario sketched in Section VII, in which scalar perturbations are 'later generated' by a primordial gravitational-wave background, would benefit from an explicit statement of whether and how this perturbation grows, or a qualification that it is a non-growing, local effect.

Minor objections (6)

[Section IV.B, around Eq. 4.21] The relation ∇²φ(x) = 6τ0²δ0(x) combined with the choice τ0 = 0 (Section IV.C) is degenerate, since δ0 = 0 at τ0 = 0. Please add a clarifying sentence that φ is the primary variable and that the relation is a formal device for selecting the growing mode.
[Section IV.B] The statement that linear vector perturbations 'represent gauge modes which can be set to zero' is correct for irrotational dust but deserves a one-line justification or a reference.
[Section IV.B, Eq. 4.13] The normalization of aσ(k) and the choice of the 3j1(kτ)/(kτ) time dependence should be stated explicitly, for instance the value of the amplitude as τ → 0.
[Section IV.C, Eq. 4.31] The notation φ(2)S(t) is introduced without a clear definition of the subscript (t) at first use; please define it where it first appears.
[Section VII] The physical interpretation of the τ⁴ and τ² tensor terms as 'Newtonian tidal induction' and a 'post-Newtonian tensor mode induced by the growth of the shear field' is asserted rather than derived; a reference would help the reader.
[Section VI, Eq. 6.8] There is a stray '+' before ψ(2)P(t) and a stray comma before φ(2)P(t); please check the typesetting of these two lines.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

Second-order relativistic perturbation theory in an Einstein-de Sitter universe can be carried through to explicit closed-form expressions, and the resulting metric can be moved from the synchronous to the Poisson gauge without further, and

The reading

Linear cosmological perturbation theory treats density ripples, vorticity and gravitational waves as three independent things that never talk to each other. Push the expansion one order further and that independence is gone: scalars source tensors and tensors source scalars. This paper sets out to do that second-order bookkeeping properly and relativistically, rather than in the Newtonian approximation where most structure-formation work lives. The authors do the heavy algebra in the synchronous and comoving gauge, where the equations for pressureless dust close neatly into a small set of geometric quantities, and then carry the answer across to the Poisson (generalized longitudinal) gauge, the one closest to the Newtonian picture a cosmologist actually reasons with. The bridge is a second-order gauge transformation built from a general formalism the same group had laid out earlier. If the construction holds, cosmologists get a self-consistent second-order metric to feed into calculations of secondary microwave-background anisotropies and of mildly non-linear growth, on all scales above roughly ten megaparsecs.

What carries the argument

Two pieces carry the argument. The first is the second-order gauge transformation law, $delta^2 tilde{T} = delta^2 T + 2mathcal{L}_{xi_{(1)}}delta T + mathcal{L}^2_{xi_{(1)}}T_0 + mathcal{L}_{xi_{(2)}}T_0$, which says a second-order perturbation in a new gauge equals the old one plus a term coupling the first-order generator to the first-order perturbation, plus a purely quadratic piece built from the background, plus a piece from a genuinely new second-order generator $xi_{(2)}$. The appearance of two vector fields rather than one is the technical heart of the matter: gauge transformations at second order do not form a one-parameter group, and treating them as though they did is precisely the error the formalism is built to avoid. The second is the sourced wave equation for the induced tensor mode, $tilde{pi}''_{ij} + frac{4}{tau}tilde{pi}'_{ij} - nabla^2tilde{pi}_{ij} = -frac{40}{3}T_{ij}$, whose source $T_{ij}$ is a quadratic functional of the linear scalar potential. Its Green's-function solution splits into a piece growing like $tau^4$ plus a piece growing like $tau^2$ plus a constant fixed by vanishing initial conditions plus an oscillating piece with the same shape as a linear gravitational wave. That split is what lets the authors say which part of the second-order tensor mode is a real propagating wave and which part is a Newtonian tidal artifact that disappears when the transformation to the Poisson gauge is applied.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The claim is that second-order relativistic perturbation theory around an Einstein-de Sitter background can be pushed all the way to explicit closed-form expressions, and that the resulting metric can be transported between gauges exactly. Working in synchronous and comoving coordinates with irrotational dust, taking growing-mode scalar initial conditions plus linear gravitational waves, the authors obtain the second-order lapse, the traceless spatial metric and the density contrast as explicit polynomials in conformal time multiplying quadratic combinations of the initial potential $phi$ (Eqs. 4.31, 4.33, 4.39). They then construct the second-order gauge transformation to the Poisson gauge and solve for the parameters $alpha^{(2)}$, $beta^{(2)}$ and $d^{(2)}_i$ that enforce the Poisson conditions $partial_i omega^{(2)}_i = partial_i chi^{(2)}_{ij} = 0$, giving new expressions for $psi^{(2)}_P$, $varphi^{(2)}_P$, $omega^{(2)}_{Pi}$, $chi^{(2)}_{Pij}$, $delta^{(2)}_P$ and the second-order velocity (Eqs. 6.8, 6.10-6.12). The physical payoff is mode mixing. A purely scalar linear seed generates a genuine tensor mode $tilde{pi}_{ij}$ obeying a sourced wave equation, while a purely tensor linear seed generates second-order density fluctuations even when no density perturbation was present to begin with.

Load-bearing premise

The entire calculation assumes an exactly flat, matter-dominated Einstein-de Sitter background filled with irrotational pressureless dust, with initial conditions set at conformal time zero and only the growing scalar mode and linear tensor modes retained, so changing the background or admitting decaying and vector modes changes the numerical coefficients.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Primordial density perturbations act as a source of second-order gravitational waves, so a stochastic gravitational-wave background exists even when no tensor modes are present at linear order.
Primordial gravitational waves generate second-order density fluctuations, so a universe seeded with tensor modes alone still develops structure.
The second-order Poisson-gauge metric supplies the input needed for a self-consistent calculation of gravity-induced secondary microwave-background anisotropies, including the non-linear Rees-Sciama effect.
Second-order tensor modes are gauge dependent, and only the oscillating part survives the transformation to the Poisson gauge, which tells observers which part of the signal is physically a gravitational wave.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The induced gravitational-wave closure density at horizon crossing scales as $delta_H^4$, so direct detection of this secondary background is likely out of reach; the more promising route is radiation from strongly non-linear collapse, which this perturbative scheme cannot reach by construction.
Because the second-order coefficients are polynomials in $tau$ with time-independent spatial coefficients, the scheme is a closed-form expansion valid only while $delta ll 1$; matching it onto Newtonian N-body outputs at late times would require resumming the $tau$ series, which the paper does not attempt.
The gauge dependence of the second-order tensor mode implies that any claim about gravitational waves from structure formation must name its gauge; the Poisson-gauge residual $tilde{pi}_{ij}$ is the natural candidate for a gauge-invariant definition at this order, though the paper does not construct one.
The machinery could be rerun on a background with a cosmological constant or with non-flat spatial sections, but the mode-mixing coefficients and the Green's function would change; the qualitative statement that scalars source tensors would survive.

Original abstract

We consider the evolution of relativistic perturbations in the Einstein-de Sitter cosmological model, including second-order effects. The perturbations are considered in two different settings: the widely used synchronous gauge and the Poisson (generalized longitudinal) one. Since, in general, perturbations are gauge dependent, we start by considering gauge transformations at second order. Next, we give the evolution of perturbations in the synchronous gauge, taking into account both scalar and tensor modes in the initial conditions. Using the second-order gauge transformation previously defined, we are then able to transform these perturbations to the Poisson gauge. The most important feature of second-order perturbation theory is mode-mixing, which here also means, for instance, that primordial density perturbations act as a source for gravitational waves, while primordial gravitational waves give rise to second-order density fluctuations. Possible applications of our formalism range from the study of the evolution of perturbations in the mildly non-linear regime to the analysis of secondary anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,616 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.21 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.11 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We consider the evolution of relativistic perturbations in the Einstein-de Sitter cosmological model, including second-order effects. The perturbations are considered in two different settings: the widely used synchronous gauge and the Poisson (generalized longitudinal) one. Since, in general, perturbations are gauge dependent, we start by considering gauge transformations at second order. Next, we give the evolution of perturbations in the synchronous gauge, taking into account both scalar and tensor modes in the initial conditions. Using the second-order gauge transformation previously defined, we are then able to transform these perturbations to the Poisson gauge. The most important feature of second-order perturbation theory is mode-mixing, which here also means, for instance, that primordial density perturbations act as a source for gravitational waves, while primordial gravitational waves give rise to second-order density fluctuations. Possible applications of our formalism range from the study of the evolution of perturbations in the mildly non-linear regime to the analysis of secondary anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We consider the evolution of relativistic perturbations in the Einstein-de Sitter cosmological model, including second-order effects.	contribution 0.95	0.83	0.06	asserted 0.80
s1	The perturbations are considered in two different settings: the widely used synchronous gauge and the Poisson (generalized longitudinal) one.	method 0.73	0.54	0.02	asserted 0.98
s2	Since, in general, perturbations are gauge dependent, we start by considering gauge transformations at second order.	method 0.69	0.50	0.03	asserted 0.99
s3	Next, we give the evolution of perturbations in the synchronous gauge, taking into account both scalar and tensor modes in the initial conditions.	method 0.66	0.87	0.05	asserted 0.98
s4	Using the second-order gauge transformation previously defined, we are then able to transform these perturbations to the Poisson gauge.	method 0.97	0.90	0.06	asserted 0.97
s5	The most important feature of second-order perturbation theory is mode-mixing, which here also means, for instance, that primordial density perturbations act as a source for gravitational waves, while primordial gravitational waves give rise to second-order density fluctuations.	interpretation 0.65	0.51	0.67	asserted 1.00
s6	Possible applications of our formalism range from the study of the evolution of perturbations in the mildly non-linear regime to the analysis of secondary anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background.	future work 0.83	0.21	0.07	hedged possibility 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.94 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (40)

[15]

M. Bruni, S. Matarrese, S. Mollerach, and S. Sonego, Cla ss. Quantum Grav. 14, 2585 (1997)

View on Pith 1997
[33]

S. Matarrese and S. Mollerach, in Proc. Spanish Relativity Meeting (ERE-96) , Valencia 1996, edited by J. A. Miralles, J. A. Morales, and D. S´ aez (Editions Fronti` eres, in press); preprint astro-ph/9705168

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[1]

P. J. E. Peebles, The Large Scale Structure of the Universe , (Princeton University Press, N.J., 1980)

View on Pith 1980
[2]

E. Bertschinger, in Cosmology and Large Scale Structure , Proc. Les Houches School, Section LX, edited by R. Shaeﬀer, J. Silk, M. Spiro, and V. Zinn–Justin (Elsevier, Netherland, 1996)

View on Pith 1996
[3]

S. Matarrese, O. Pantano and D. S´ aez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 320 (1994); Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 271, 513 (1994)

View on Pith 1994
[4]

S. Matarrese and D. Terranova, Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 283, 400 (1996)

View on Pith 1996
[5]

P. J. E. Peebles, Principles of Physical Cosmology , (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1993)

View on Pith 1993
[6]

P. Schneider, J. Ehlers, and E. E. Falco, Gravitational Lenses (Springer–Verlag, Berlin 1992)

View on Pith 1992
[7]

L. Kofman and D. Pogosyan, Ap. J. 442, 30 (1995)

View on Pith 1995
[8]

Ya. B. Zel’dovich, Astron. Astrophys. 5, 84 (1970)

View on Pith 1970
[9]

S. Matarrese and C. Daﬀara, in preparation

View on Pith
[10]

M. Bruni, S. Matarrese, and O. Pantano, Silent Universes , in Dynamical Systems in Cosmology , Eds. G. F. R. Ellis, & J. Wainwright (Cambridge University Press, Ca mbridge 1997)

View on Pith 1997
[11]

M. Rees and D. W. Sciama, Nature 217, 511 (1968)

View on Pith 1968
[12]

T. Pyne and S. M. Carroll, Phys. Rev. D 53, 2920 (1996)

View on Pith 1996
[13]

S. Mollerach and S. Matarrese, Phys. Rev. D 56, 4494 (1997)

View on Pith 1997
[14]

C.-P. Ma, and E. Bertschinger, Ap. J. 455, 7 (1995)

View on Pith 1995
[16]

S. Sonego and M. Bruni, Comm. Math. Phys., 193, 209 (1998)

View on Pith 1998
[17]

K. Tomita, Prog. Theor. Phys. 37, 831 (1967)

View on Pith 1967
[18]

H. Russ, M. Morita, M. Kasai, and G. B¨ orner, Phys. Rev. D 53, 6881 (1996)

View on Pith 1996
[19]

D. S. Salopek, J. M. Stewart, and K. M. Croudace, Mon. Not . R. astr. Soc. 271, 1005 (1994)

View on Pith 1994
[20]

K. Tomita, Prog. Theor. Phys. 45, 1747 (1971); Prog. Theor. Phys. 47, 416 (1972)

View on Pith 1971
[21]

E. M. Lifshitz, J. Phys. USSR 10, 116 (1946); E. M. Lifshitz and I. M. Khalatnikov, Adv. Phys. 12, 185 (1963); L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields (Pergamon, Oxford, 1975)

View on Pith 1946
[22]

R. K. Sachs, in Relativity, Groups, and Topology , edited by C. DeWitt and B. DeWitt (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1964)

View on Pith 1964
[23]

J. M. Stewart and M. Walker, Proc. R. Soc. London A 341, 49 (1974)

View on Pith 1974
[24]

J. M. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1882 (1980)

View on Pith 1980
[25]

G. F. R. Ellis and M. Bruni, Phys. Rev. D 40, 1804 (1989)

View on Pith 1989
[26]

J. M. Stewart, Class. Quantum Grav. 7, 1169 (1990)

View on Pith 1990
[27]

H. Kodama and M. Sasaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 78, 1 (1984)

View on Pith 1984
[28]

V. F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman, and R. H. Brandenberger, P hys. Rep. 215, 203 (1992)

View on Pith 1992
[29]

R. M. Wald, General Relativity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984)

View on Pith 1984
[30]

It is worth pointing out here that the k-th order perturbation δkT of a tensor Tλ on Mλ is deﬁned as the k-th derivative with respect to λ of T (λ) (the representation, in a given gauge, of Tλ on the background M0), see Refs. [15,29]. This is easily checked from Eqs. (2.6), (2.7), and is the reason for the numerical factor 1 /k! in front of the δkT , δk ˜T terms

View on Pith
[31]

R. J. Gleiser, C. O. Nicasio, R. H. Price, and J. Pullin, C lass. Quantum Grav. 13, L117 (1996); preprint gr-qc/9609022

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[32]

V. F. Mukhanov, L. R. W. Abramo, and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1624 (1997); preprint gr-qc/9704037

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[34]

For non linear perturbations the parametrization is no t unique, see Ref. [15] for a brief discussion of this point; here we simply assume that a parametrization has been given, and we work within it

View on Pith
[35]

R. D’Inverno, Introducing Einstein ’s Relativity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992)

View on Pith 1992
[36]

H. Stephani, General Relativity, second edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1 990)

View on Pith
[37]

S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology (Wiley, New York 1973)

View on Pith 1973
[38]

B. F. Schutz, Geometrical methods of mathematical physics , (Cambridge, 1980)

View on Pith 1980
[39]

Note the diﬀerence between Eq. (A9), where the function s ˜xµ are given by the action of the operator exp[λ£ξ] on the functions xµ, and Eq. (A11), where the components ˜Zµ of the pull-back ˜Z are the µ- components of the vector ﬁeld given by the action of exp[ λ£ξ] on Z

View on Pith
[40]

R. Geroch and L. Lindblom, J. Math. Phys. 26, 2581 (1985); E. Flanagan and R. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 54, 6233 (1996); B. F. Schutz, in Relativistic Astrophysics and Cosmology , edited by X. Fustero and E. Verdaguer (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1984). 20 APPENDIX A: TAYLOR EXP ANSION OF TENSOR FIELDS In this appendix we present some mathematical results used i...

View on Pith 1985

Forward citations

Showing 60 of 98 Pith papers that cite this

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. See all 98 Pith citations

Nonlinear Relativistic Effects on Cosmological Redshift Drift
astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

Second-order relativistic effects on redshift drift are computed, showing distortions appear only at this order with enhanced nonlinear bispectrum contributions at low redshift and large momenta.
Gravitational waves and the exit from de Sitter in Inflation without an Inflaton
astro-ph.CO 2026-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

In Inflation without an Inflaton, second-order gravitons generate the curvature perturbation with a red tilt, tensor modes are not enhanced, and the spectrum survives the exit from de Sitter via a postulated global cl...
A Fast Method to Compute Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves on a Lattice with Primordial Non-Gaussianities
astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

A new lattice method recasts SIGW integrals as FFT convolutions to compute fully non-Gaussian spectra in seconds with ~10% error on a radiation-dominated background.
Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Reheating: The Scalar-Induced Component
hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

Accounting for the minimal mass spread of primordial black holes from gravitational collapse suppresses the Poltergeist GW background to the level of generic scalar-induced signals and reopens ultra-light PBH parameter space.
Observable Gravitational Wave Strain at Second Order
gr-qc 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

At second order, the gravitational-wave strain measured by geodesic observers exchanging light pulses is the transverse-traceless metric perturbation in the Newton gauge (h_N^(2)).

Show 55 more citing papers

Isocurvature Induced Gravitational Waves at Pulsar Timing Arrays
astro-ph.CO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

The work shows that free-streaming dark radiation isocurvature produces a qualitatively different gravitational wave spectrum than cold dark matter isocurvature and derives constraints on isocurvature power spectra ar...
General SIGW source for reheating dynamics
gr-qc 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A gauge-invariant source term for scalar-induced gravitational waves is derived for smooth reheating with an inflaton field transitioning into fluids.
Suppression of the induced gravitational wave background due to third-order perturbations
astro-ph.CO 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Third-order scalar-tensor correlations suppress the induced gravitational wave background, and some of these new contributions diverge in the ultraviolet.
Cosmological Non-Linearities as an Effective Fluid
astro-ph.CO 2010-04 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

Small-scale cosmological non-linearities renormalize the background only at order v squared and induce a viscous effective fluid whose parameters can be matched to simulations, with virialized scales decoupling entirely.
Primordial black holes and gravitational waves from aligned axion inflation
astro-ph.CO 2026-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A two-axion inflation model produces a small-scale curvature spike during a metastable-to-stable transition, yielding asteroid-mass primordial black holes and millihertz-to-decihertz gravitational waves.
Unpolarized Low-Frequency Tail of Causal Chiral Gravitational Waves
gr-qc 2026-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

For finite-time parity-violating sources, the low-frequency tail of the chiral gravitational-wave background is unpolarized and the chirality fraction falls linearly with frequency.
Infrared Universality of Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Beyond Second Order
astro-ph.CO 2026-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The infrared scaling of scalar induced gravitational waves is universally determined by the background equation of state and is unaffected by higher-order perturbative corrections, non-Gaussianities, or the shape of t...
Opening the Window of Ultra-Light PBHs by Exorcising the Poltergeist
hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

Incorporating the general-relativity mass tail df_PBH/d ln M ∝ M^3.78 smooths PBH evaporation, suppresses the scalar-induced GW signal by orders of magnitude, and reopens the ultra-light PBH window for the hot Big Bang.
A non-perturbative framework for N-point functions of locally non-Gaussian fields
astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

N-point functions of locally non-Gaussian fields can be expanded in powers of the Gaussian correlation function using the Kibble-Slepian decomposition, with coefficients from one-point integrals; for an exponential-ta...
Primordial black hole induced gravitational waves in $f(R)$ gravity
astro-ph.CO 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

In R^(1+ε) gravity, exponential growth of scalar perturbations during a PBH-driven early matter era enhances the induced gravitational wave signal, with Ω_GW ∝ f on large scales.
Twisted echoes of an odd quartet: Scalar-induced gravitational waves as a probe of primordial parity-violation
astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A parity-odd primordial trispectrum imprints measurable left-right asymmetry in scalar-induced gravitational waves, and the chirality ratio directly tracks the parity-odd to parity-even trispectrum amplitude ratio.
Isotropy, anisotropies and non-Gaussianity in the scalar-induced gravitational-wave background: diagrammatic approach for primordial non-Gaussianity up to arbitrary order
astro-ph.CO 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

Extends diagrammatic approach for scalar-induced gravitational waves to arbitrary-order local PNG, deriving semi-analytic spectra for energy density, anisotropies, bispectrum and trispectrum up to quartic terms.
The Dual Primordial Black Hole Formation Scenario
astro-ph.CO 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A single small-scale perturbation can form ultralight black holes during a break in inflation and heavier black holes after inflation, linking reheating to dark matter.
Enhancement of primordial curvature perturbations in $R^3$-corrected Starobinsky-Higgs inflation
astro-ph.CO 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Adding a negative R^3 term to Starobinsky-Higgs inflation raises the CMB spectral index from about 0.94 to 0.965, making the model consistent with Planck while preserving the small-scale curvature enhancement needed f...
Curvature Perturbations from First-Order Phase Transitions: Implications to Black Holes and Gravitational Waves
hep-ph 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

Covariant analysis of curvature perturbations from first-order phase transitions reveals gauge-dependent overestimation of primordial black holes and gravitational waves in prior non-covariant calculations, leading to...
Reconstructing Primordial Curvature Perturbations via Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves with LISA
astro-ph.CO 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

LISA can reconstruct the primordial curvature power spectrum from scalar-induced gravitational waves, with percent-level precision near the peak and Bayesian tests separating SIGWs from other sources.
Inflation without an Inflaton
astro-ph.CO 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Second-order tensor vacuum fluctuations in pure de Sitter generate a nearly scale-invariant scalar power spectrum, offering a route to inflation without an inflaton scalar field.
Finite parts of inflationary loops
hep-th 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A new dimensional-regularization procedure extracts complete finite parts of inflationary loop integrals, yielding a regulator-independent one-loop tensor power spectrum in slow-roll inflation with no late-time divergence.
Gravitational wave signatures from reheating in Chern-Simons running-vacuum cosmology
gr-qc 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Scalaron-induced gravitational waves in Chern-Simons running-vacuum cosmology have a universal f^6 high-frequency scaling, distinguishable from the f^7 scaling of general relativity, and may be detectable by future ob...
Search for scalar induced gravitational waves in the International Pulsar Timing Array Data Release 2 and NANOgrav 12.5 years datasets
astro-ph.CO 2023-02 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

The IPTA DR2 common-spectrum signal is decisively better fit by supermassive black hole binaries than by scalar-induced gravitational waves once primordial black hole overproduction caps the curvature power spectrum; ...
Logarithmic Duality of the Curvature Perturbation
astro-ph.CO 2022-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

For any piecewise-quadratic inflaton potential, the comoving curvature perturbation is an explicit sum of logarithms whose two algebraic forms are equivalent, and the tail of its distribution is exponential or Gumbel-...
Anatomy of single-field inflationary models for primordial black holes
astro-ph.CO 2022-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A two-parabola inflaton potential yields a closed-form curvature power spectrum whose peak position and height map onto PBH mass and abundance, and the resulting spectral-distortion bound excludes single-field PBHs he...
Revisiting small-scale fluctuations in $\alpha$-attractor models of inflation
astro-ph.CO 2021-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

For alpha-attractor inflation with an inflection point, the Planck spectral-tilt bound forces any primordial black holes below 10^8 g and pushes the induced gravitational-wave peak to roughly 10 kHz or above.
Amplification of Primordial Perturbations from the Rise or Fall of the Inflaton
astro-ph.CO 2021-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Single-field inflation with a step-like potential feature can raise the small-scale curvature power spectrum by up to 10^7 without strong coupling, provided the step completes in less than one e-fold but more than the...
Non-Gaussianity and the induced gravitational wave background
astro-ph.CO 2021-05 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

The connected part of the local-type primordial trispectrum makes non-negligible, sometimes dominant, contributions to the gravitational wave background induced by scalar perturbations, contrary to earlier claims that...
Gravitational wave constraints on the primordial black hole dominated early universe
gr-qc 2020-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Gravitational waves from Poisson fluctuations in a primordial-black-hole-dominated era are dominated by the sudden evaporation transition, bounding the initial black hole fraction to below about 10^-6 for 10^4 gram bl...
NANOGrav Hints on Planet-Mass Primordial Black Holes
astro-ph.CO 2020-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A dust-like pre-BBN expansion with -0.091 < w < 0.048 reproduces the NANOGrav 12.5-year GW amplitude and slope and, from the same curvature peak, yields planet-mass primordial black holes at the abundance OGLE microle...
Gravitational waves induced by the local-type non-Gaussian curvature perturbations
astro-ph.CO 2020-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Third-order local non-Gaussianity can suppress scalar-induced gravitational waves enough that LISA may not detect them even if primordial black holes make up all dark matter.
Induced gravitational waves as a probe of thermal history of the universe
gr-qc 2020-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The low-frequency slope of the gravitational wave background induced by primordial density fluctuations depends on the equation of state of the pre-radiation universe, giving a possible probe of thermal history.
Gravitational Wave Production right after a Primordial Black Hole Evaporation
astro-ph.CO 2020-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Sudden reheating from evaporating primordial black holes amplifies induced gravitational waves enough that future detectors could constrain the abundance of 10^3 to 10^5 gram black holes.
Probing Primordial-Black-Hole Dark Matter with Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves
astro-ph.CO 2019-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Third-order corrections to scalar-induced gravitational waves boost the predicted signal by about ten percent and extend the cutoff frequency, widening the range of primordial black hole masses that pulsar timing arra...
Overshooting, Critical Higgs Inflation and Second Order Gravitational Wave Signatures
hep-ph 2019-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A short overshooting phase in critical Higgs inflation drives the scalar power spectrum to about 10^-4 at 10^13 per megaparsec, sourcing a second-order gravitational wave background within reach of DECIGO and BBO.
Gravitational Waves Induced by non-Gaussian Scalar Perturbations
astro-ph.CO 2018-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Local-type non-Gaussianity in a peaked curvature spectrum produces a k^3-rising, multi-peaked gravitational-wave background cut off at four times the peak scale, and PBH dark matter in the 10^20 to 10^22 gram window i...
Stochastic gravitational waves associated with the formation of primordial black holes
astro-ph.CO 2016-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

At fixed primordial black hole abundance, non-gaussian curvature perturbations lower the RMS fluctuation and hence the second-order induced gravitational-wave background, allowing the PBH scenario to evade current pul...
Observed galaxy number counts on the lightcone up to second order: I. Main result
astro-ph.CO 2014-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A complete second-order, general-relativistic expression for the observed galaxy number overdensity on the light cone is derived, correcting an error in the published first version and matching an independent derivation.
Beyond the plane-parallel and Newtonian approach: Wide-angle redshift distortions and convergence in general relativity
astro-ph.CO 2012-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A complete general-relativistic tripolar decomposition of the redshift-space galaxy correlation function is derived, with the new GR terms producing corrections of roughly 5 to 10 percent at gigaparsec separations.
Cosmological 3-point correlators from holography
hep-th 2011-04 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

All cosmological 3-point correlators, including tensor modes, are rewritten as analytic continuations of stress-energy 3-point functions of a dual 3D QFT, with universal helicity relations for tensors.
Holographic Non-Gaussianity
hep-th 2010-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

For a class of holographic inflationary models, the primordial bispectrum is exactly of equilateral shape with f_NL = 5/36, independent of the dual QFT's field content.
Scalar-induced gravitational waves from a box-shaped curvature power spectrum
gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 5.5 of 10

Analytic SIGW spectra for a log-box curvature power spectrum: narrow-box geometric overlap factor turning IR slope k^{3}ln^{2}k into k^{2}ln^{2}k, plus broad-box product of universal edge functions.
Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity and parity-violation through Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves with next-generation ground-based interferometers
astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

ET+CE forecast: injected SIGW parameters (A_p, f_peak, f_NL, tau_NL, parity-odd tau_tilde_NL) are recovered within 1-2 sigma despite an astrophysical foreground, but the chiral V-mode is sub-threshold (SNR 0.5-1.9).
Cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA: II. Reconstruction of conventional signals over astrophysical foregrounds
astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

When realistic astrophysical foregrounds are included, LISA can reconstruct the cosmic-string tension to 10% precision only for Gμ ≳ 10^{-11}, 10^5 times larger than foreground-free forecasts.
Matching second-order classical and 1-loop quantum tensor power spectra in de Sitter spacetime
hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Classical part of 1-loop tensor power spectrum in de Sitter is IR divergent but cancels with vacuum part, enabling non-perturbative renormalization to extract unaffected physical information.
Cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA: I. Signal survey, template reconstruction, and model comparison
astro-ph.CO 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

As provided, the manuscript body (random lasing) does not correspond to the abstract (cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA), leaving the abstract's quantitative claims unsupported by any accessible text.
On the Gauge Invariance of Secondary Gravitational Waves
astro-ph.CO 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

The paper argues that discarding non-light-speed modes of the second-order tensor perturbation makes the induced gravitational wave energy density gauge-invariant in both adiabatic and isocurvature scenarios.
Can tensor-scalar induced GWs dominate PTA observations ?
astro-ph.CO 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A Bayesian fit to NANOGrav 15-year data finds that tensor-scalar induced gravitational waves plus primordial tensor waves can fit the PTA background, with amplitudes constrained by CMB, BAO, and PBH limits.
Induced Gravitational Waves with Kination Era for Recent Pulsar Timing Array Signals
astro-ph.CO 2023-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Gravitational waves induced by curvature perturbations during a stiff (w=1) kination epoch fit the NANOGrav 15-year spectrum and suppress primordial black hole production by tens of orders of magnitude.
Cancellation of quantum corrections on the soft curvature perturbations
hep-th 2023-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Including previously dropped surface terms, the one-loop correction to superhorizon curvature perturbations in transient ultra-slow-roll inflation cancels via Maldacena's consistency relation, so small-scale enhanceme...
Gravitational wave signatures of no-scale Supergravity in NANOGrav and beyond
hep-th 2023-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

No-scale supergravity with an inflection-point potential yields microscopic primordial black holes whose formation, clustering, and evaporation produce a three-peaked gravitational-wave spectrum at nHz, Hz, and kHz.
Cosmological Background Interpretation of Pulsar Timing Array Data
astro-ph.CO 2023-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Combined NANOGrav and EPTA pulsar timing data prefer scalar-induced and superstring gravitational-wave backgrounds over a simple supermassive-black-hole-binary power law, and constrain primordial non-Gaussianity to |f...
Translating nano-Hertz gravitational wave background into primordial perturbations taking account of the cosmological QCD phase transition
astro-ph.CO 2023-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Including the cosmological QCD phase transition in the calculation of gravitational waves induced by primordial curvature perturbations raises the NANOGrav-inferred perturbation amplitude by about 25% and the spectral...
Footprints of the QCD Crossover on Cosmological Gravitational Waves at Pulsar Timing Arrays
astro-ph.CO 2023-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

The QCD crossover imprints a calculable, non-power-law shape on the low-frequency tail of a primordial gravitational-wave background, and this shape fits current pulsar-timing data better than the usual cubic power law.
Doubly peaked induced stochastic gravitational wave background : Testing baryogenesis from primordial black holes
astro-ph.CO 2022-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A brief era of primordial-black-hole domination before Big Bang nucleosynthesis leaves a two-peaked induced gravitational wave spectrum whose detection would probe non-thermal baryogenesis at GUT-scale energies.
Primordial Black Hole Formation in Non-Minimal Curvaton Scenario
astro-ph.CO 2021-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

In the non-minimal curvaton scenario, the fully nonlinear curvature perturbation that seeds primordial black holes reduces to quadratic local non-Gaussianity whenever the black holes do not overclose the universe, and...
Primordial Black Holes Arise When The Inflaton Falls
astro-ph.CO 2021-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A downward step in the inflaton potential, crossed in less than an e-fold, amplifies curvature perturbations by the ratio of kinetic energies across the step, enough to seed primordial black holes.
Probing non-Gaussianities with the high frequency tail of induced gravitational waves
astro-ph.CO 2021-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

In single-field inflation, the ultraviolet tilt of the induced gravitational wave spectrum measures the primordial non-Gaussianity parameter f_NL, with non-Gaussian corrections to the spectrum negligible given no prim...

See all 98 Pith citations

How later papers used it

215 later papers cite it

Evidence: substantial. 197 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 12 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 12 of the 307 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

1 later paper by other authors is listed below: 1 used its method or tool. 1 more paper by the same authors is listed: 1 used its method or tool.

Uses its method or tool 2 of 8 papers with this label · 1 by the same authors

Used this paper's notation to impose that gamma_P is transverse and solve for beta_2 and d_2i.

Action approach to cosmological perturbations: the 2nd order metric in matter dominance (2008) · 0.88 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting

By the same authors

Followed the approach used in this paper to obtain the evolution of cosmological perturbations in the Poisson gauge through a gauge transformation.

A new approach to cosmological perturbations in f(R) models (2011) (same authors) · 1.00 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting

How the literature uses it

198 arXiv papers cite this in 283 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 174 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 2 papers

The result is ℱ^(2)_μ = (n-2)H^2 𝓋̅_μ [2 (ϵ- δ) ∂_t𝒹 + ϵ∂_t𝒽 + 2 ((n - 1 - 2ϵ)(ϵ- δ) + 2ϵδ- δ̇/H)H𝒹 + 2 ϵ∂̅_α𝓋̅^α ] + (n-2) H^2/2u_μ [(1 + 2ϵ- 2δ) ∂_t𝒽 𝒹 - 2 ϵ𝒽^αβ (∂_t - 2 H)𝒽_αβ + 4 (ϵ- δ) 𝒹∂̅_α𝓋̅^α - 4ϵ𝒽_αβ ∂̅^β𝓋̅^α - 2(n-1)(1 - δ̇/2ϵδH)δH𝒹^2 + 4 𝓋̅^α (2ϵ∂_t𝓋̅_α + (n - 2 + 2 δ- 2 ϵ) ϵH𝓋̅_α + 1/2ϵ∂̅_α𝒽 - (δ- ϵ) ∂̅_α𝒹 - ϵ∂̅_β𝒽_α^β) ] + 2(n-2) H^2 [ (ϵ- δ)∂_t𝓋̅_μ 𝒹 + ϵ𝓋̅^α∂̅_α𝓋̅_μ - (1 - δ̇/2 ϵδH)δ𝒹 ∂̅_μ𝒹 ] . 2.2em The equations that we have obtained in this section extend the second-order analysis of Ref. [ref] to arbitrary cosmological backgrounds and a general flow of the fluid.

Synchronous coordinates and gauge-invariant observables in cosmological spacetimes · Second order · 0.98
Therefore, the Lemaître model gives us the chance to study in an exact nonlinear fashion the generation of anisotropic stress in fluids with non-negligible pressure, thus extending previous work based on second-order perturbation theory [ref] .

Perturbed Newtonian description of the Lema\^itre model with non-negligible pressure · Conclusions · 1.00

Uses its method or tool 8 papers

Given the potential $Φ(r)$ we can compute the $ΔT/T$ for a photon which travels through this patch, by computing a line integral, following the expression given in [ref] which is valid at second order in perturbation theory in $Φ$: ΔT/T^(RS)= 2 ∫^τ_E_τ_O dττ( 1/6Φ'^2-10/21Υ_0 ) ,

The Cold Spot as a Large Void: Rees-Sciama effect on CMB Power Spectrum and Bispectrum · Temperature Profile · 1.00
We follow the same strategy in [ref] .

On non-linear CMB temperature anisotropy from gravitational perturbations · Introduction · 0.94
We can solve this equation using Green's function method which allows us to write the power spectrum of tensor perturbations [ref] , [equation] In this convolution integral, the last two terms represent the initial power spectrum of first-order scalar perturbations and the factor $I^2(v,u,x)$ takes into account the time evolution of scalar perturbations.

Doubly peaked induced stochastic gravitational wave background : Testing baryogenesis from primordial black holes · ISGWB from the two contributions · 1.00

Compares with it 3 papers

We recover the perfect fluid transformation rules for the energy density, the pressure, the velocity and the anisotropic stress given in Ref. [ref] up to second order, when starting from the statistical description.

Gauge invariant Boltzmann equation and the fluid limit · Second-order fluid quantities transformation · 0.80
On the other hand, our solution is consistent with Eq. (5.1) of [ref] , Eq. (4.39) of [ref] and Eq. (40) of [ref] , in the matter-dominated era for the particular choice of primordial non-Gaussianity parameter $f_NL=-5/3$ (the equivalence with [ref] is explicit when the solution is written in Eulerian spatial coordinates, see Appendix).

Non-Gaussian initial conditions in $\Lambda$CDM: Newtonian, relativistic and primordial contributions · The complete solution · 1.00
Going to this gauge will enable us to compare our results with those obtained in [ref] .

Action approach to cosmological perturbations: the 2nd order metric in matter dominance · Transforming to Poisson gauge · 1.00

Cites it as support 2 papers

And at second order, the metric cannot be written in the simple diagonal form metric [ref] .

Applicability of the linearly perturbed FRW metric and Newtonian cosmology · The perturbative calculation · 0.98
Even if they do exist at first order, they don't affect first-order density perturbations and at second order their effect is subdominant [ref] .

Non-Gaussian initial conditions in $\Lambda$CDM: Newtonian, relativistic and primordial contributions · The perturbative treatment · 0.99

Cites it as background 78 papers

The coupling at second order between curvature fluctuation $ζ$ modes leads to a GWB [ref] .

Cosmological Background Interpretation of Pulsar Timing Array Data · Introduction · 0.90
Here we revisit the analysis of this cosmological vector background (see Refs. [ref] for previous work).

The cosmological background of vector modes · INTRODUCTION · 0.99
Scalar induced GWs – Curvature perturbations induce formation of GWs at second order from mode coupling [ref] .

Did NANOGrav see a signal from primordial black hole formation? · Introduction · 0.97

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [15]

M. Bruni, S. Matarrese, S. Mollerach, and S. Sonego, Cla ss. Quantum Grav. 14, 2585 (1997)

View on Pith 1997

[2] [33]

S. Matarrese and S. Mollerach, in Proc. Spanish Relativity Meeting (ERE-96) , Valencia 1996, edited by J. A. Miralles, J. A. Morales, and D. S´ aez (Editions Fronti` eres, in press); preprint astro-ph/9705168

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[3] [1]

P. J. E. Peebles, The Large Scale Structure of the Universe , (Princeton University Press, N.J., 1980)

View on Pith 1980

[4] [2]

E. Bertschinger, in Cosmology and Large Scale Structure , Proc. Les Houches School, Section LX, edited by R. Shaeﬀer, J. Silk, M. Spiro, and V. Zinn–Justin (Elsevier, Netherland, 1996)

View on Pith 1996

[5] [3]

S. Matarrese, O. Pantano and D. S´ aez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 320 (1994); Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 271, 513 (1994)

View on Pith 1994

[6] [4]

S. Matarrese and D. Terranova, Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 283, 400 (1996)

View on Pith 1996

[7] [5]

P. J. E. Peebles, Principles of Physical Cosmology , (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1993)

View on Pith 1993

[8] [6]

P. Schneider, J. Ehlers, and E. E. Falco, Gravitational Lenses (Springer–Verlag, Berlin 1992)

View on Pith 1992

[9] [7]

L. Kofman and D. Pogosyan, Ap. J. 442, 30 (1995)

View on Pith 1995

[10] [8]

Ya. B. Zel’dovich, Astron. Astrophys. 5, 84 (1970)

View on Pith 1970

[11] [9]

S. Matarrese and C. Daﬀara, in preparation

View on Pith

[12] [10]

M. Bruni, S. Matarrese, and O. Pantano, Silent Universes , in Dynamical Systems in Cosmology , Eds. G. F. R. Ellis, & J. Wainwright (Cambridge University Press, Ca mbridge 1997)

View on Pith 1997

[13] [11]

M. Rees and D. W. Sciama, Nature 217, 511 (1968)

View on Pith 1968

[14] [12]

T. Pyne and S. M. Carroll, Phys. Rev. D 53, 2920 (1996)

View on Pith 1996

[15] [13]

S. Mollerach and S. Matarrese, Phys. Rev. D 56, 4494 (1997)

View on Pith 1997

[16] [14]

C.-P. Ma, and E. Bertschinger, Ap. J. 455, 7 (1995)

View on Pith 1995

[17] [16]

S. Sonego and M. Bruni, Comm. Math. Phys., 193, 209 (1998)

View on Pith 1998

[18] [17]

K. Tomita, Prog. Theor. Phys. 37, 831 (1967)

View on Pith 1967

[19] [18]

H. Russ, M. Morita, M. Kasai, and G. B¨ orner, Phys. Rev. D 53, 6881 (1996)

View on Pith 1996

[20] [19]

D. S. Salopek, J. M. Stewart, and K. M. Croudace, Mon. Not . R. astr. Soc. 271, 1005 (1994)

View on Pith 1994

[21] [20]

K. Tomita, Prog. Theor. Phys. 45, 1747 (1971); Prog. Theor. Phys. 47, 416 (1972)

View on Pith 1971

[22] [21]

E. M. Lifshitz, J. Phys. USSR 10, 116 (1946); E. M. Lifshitz and I. M. Khalatnikov, Adv. Phys. 12, 185 (1963); L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields (Pergamon, Oxford, 1975)

View on Pith 1946

[23] [22]

R. K. Sachs, in Relativity, Groups, and Topology , edited by C. DeWitt and B. DeWitt (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1964)

View on Pith 1964

[24] [23]

J. M. Stewart and M. Walker, Proc. R. Soc. London A 341, 49 (1974)

View on Pith 1974

[25] [24]

J. M. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1882 (1980)

View on Pith 1980

[26] [25]

G. F. R. Ellis and M. Bruni, Phys. Rev. D 40, 1804 (1989)

View on Pith 1989

[27] [26]

J. M. Stewart, Class. Quantum Grav. 7, 1169 (1990)

View on Pith 1990

[28] [27]

H. Kodama and M. Sasaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 78, 1 (1984)

View on Pith 1984

[29] [28]

V. F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman, and R. H. Brandenberger, P hys. Rep. 215, 203 (1992)

View on Pith 1992

[30] [29]

R. M. Wald, General Relativity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984)

View on Pith 1984

[31] [30]

It is worth pointing out here that the k-th order perturbation δkT of a tensor Tλ on Mλ is deﬁned as the k-th derivative with respect to λ of T (λ) (the representation, in a given gauge, of Tλ on the background M0), see Refs. [15,29]. This is easily checked from Eqs. (2.6), (2.7), and is the reason for the numerical factor 1 /k! in front of the δkT , δk ˜T terms

View on Pith

[32] [31]

R. J. Gleiser, C. O. Nicasio, R. H. Price, and J. Pullin, C lass. Quantum Grav. 13, L117 (1996); preprint gr-qc/9609022

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[33] [32]

V. F. Mukhanov, L. R. W. Abramo, and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1624 (1997); preprint gr-qc/9704037

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[34] [34]

For non linear perturbations the parametrization is no t unique, see Ref. [15] for a brief discussion of this point; here we simply assume that a parametrization has been given, and we work within it

View on Pith

[35] [35]

R. D’Inverno, Introducing Einstein ’s Relativity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992)

View on Pith 1992

[36] [36]

H. Stephani, General Relativity, second edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1 990)

View on Pith

[37] [37]

S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology (Wiley, New York 1973)

View on Pith 1973

[38] [38]

B. F. Schutz, Geometrical methods of mathematical physics , (Cambridge, 1980)

View on Pith 1980

[39] [39]

Note the diﬀerence between Eq. (A9), where the function s ˜xµ are given by the action of the operator exp[λ£ξ] on the functions xµ, and Eq. (A11), where the components ˜Zµ of the pull-back ˜Z are the µ- components of the vector ﬁeld given by the action of exp[ λ£ξ] on Z

View on Pith

[40] [40]

R. Geroch and L. Lindblom, J. Math. Phys. 26, 2581 (1985); E. Flanagan and R. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 54, 6233 (1996); B. F. Schutz, in Relativistic Astrophysics and Cosmology , edited by X. Fustero and E. Verdaguer (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1984). 20 APPENDIX A: TAYLOR EXP ANSION OF TENSOR FIELDS In this appendix we present some mathematical results used i...

View on Pith 1985