Pith. Sign in

RECORD

A Quantum Analogue of the Jarzynski Equality

Statistical Mechanics · Submitted 28 Jul 2000

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim As a result, we find that the quantum analogue functions well.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDcond-mat/0007456 (version 1)
Pith IDH4W7Q7SH, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationSatoshi Yukawa. "A Quantum Analogue of the Jarzynski Equality." arXiv:cond-mat/0007456 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/H4W7Q7SH
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,517 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.08 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

A quantum analogue of the Jarzynski equality is constructed. This equality connects an ensemble average of exponentiated work with the Helmholtz free-energy difference in a nonequilibrium switching process subject to a thermal heat bath. To confirm its validity in a practical situation, we also investigate an open quantum system that is a spin 1/2 system with a scanning magnetic field interacting with a thermal heat bath. As a result, we find that the quantum analogue functions well.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 A quantum analogue of the Jarzynski equality is constructed. contribution 1.00 0.91 0.19 asserted 1.00
s1 This equality connects an ensemble average of exponentiated work with the Helmholtz free-energy difference in a nonequilibrium switching process subject to a thermal heat bath. contribution 0.75 0.50 0.29 asserted 1.00
s2 To confirm its validity in a practical situation, we also investigate an open quantum system that is a spin 1/2 system with a scanning magnetic field interacting with a thermal heat bath. method 0.84 0.93 0.03 asserted 0.77
s3 As a result, we find that the quantum analogue functions well. result 0.99 0.95 0.75 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.56.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

A quantum analogue of the Jarzynski equality is constructed. This equality connects an ensemble average of exponentiated work with the Helmholtz free-energy difference in a nonequilibrium switching process subject to a thermal heat bath. To confirm its validity in a practical situation, we also investigate an open quantum system that is a spin 1/2 system with a scanning magnetic field interacting with a thermal heat bath. As a result, we find that the quantum analogue functions well.

Human review
References

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.