Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Determination of The Spin Contributed Knight Shift in Na_(0.35) Co O₂ cdot 1.3 H₂ O

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv cond-mat/0403293 v1 pith:CWLUGWMK submitted 2004-03-11 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

Determination of The Spin Contributed Knight Shift in Na_(0.35) Co O₂ cdot 1.3 H₂ O

classification cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el
keywords mathrmknightshiftgammaspinbelowcdotcontributed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The spin contributed Knight shift $^{59}K_{s}$ of $^{59}\mathrm{Co}$ in the triangular lattice superconductor, $\mathrm{Na_{0.35}CoO_{2} \cdot 1.3H_{2}O}$, has been estimated by NMR experiments in an oriented 2-dimensional powder sample. The Knight shift in the paramagnetic state was estimated by $\delta\nu/(\gamma\mathrm{_{N}}H_{i})$ vs. $(\gamma\mathrm{_{N}}H_{i})^{-2}$ plot at various temperatures. A Knight shift vs. magnetic susceptibility diagram revealed that at least 0.3 % for $K_{x}$ and 0.1 % for $K_{y}$ are attributed to the spin contribution. Below $T\mathrm{_{c}}$, $\delta\nu/(\gamma\mathrm{_{N}}H_{i})$ vs. $(\gamma\mathrm{_{N}}H_{i})^{-2}$ plot does not give unique Knight shift because of the diamagnetic effect and/or the other ones. We concluded that the invariant behavior at about 7 T (between $H\mathrm{_{c1}}$ and $H\mathrm{_{c2}}$) below $T\mathrm{_{c}}$ possibly indicates the nature of the spin-triplet superconductivity.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.