Reply to Samuely et al. cond-mat/0503153
classification
❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords
cond-matresultssamuelybelowclaimclaimscontradictingestablished
read the original abstract
Samuely et al. (cond-mat/0503153) make the strong claim that our letter is 'contradicting several established experimental results'. As we will show below this is not justified and the claims from are based on a misinterpretation of our results.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.