Novel surface universality classes with strong anisotropy

B. Schmittmann (Virginia Tech); Gunnar Pruessner (Imperial College); H.K. Janssen (Heinrich-Heine Universitaet Duesseldorf)

REVIEW

Novel surface universality classes with strong anisotropy

B. Schmittmann (Virginia Tech), Gunnar Pruessner (Imperial College), H.K. Janssen (Heinrich-Heine Universitaet Duesseldorf)

Statistical Mechanics · Submitted 27 Feb 2006 · 40 references

Pith's verdict: Clean one-loop RG analysis that finds two new anisotropic surface universality classes; the d=2 exponents are plausible but rest on an unproven fixed-point persistence assumption.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on August 28, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 3 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDcond-mat/0602641 (version 1)

Pith IDMIFIGQEX, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationB. Schmittmann (Virginia Tech), Gunnar Pruessner (Imperial College), H.K. Janssen (Heinrich-Heine Universitaet Duesseldorf). "Novel surface universality classes with strong anisotropy." arXiv:cond-mat/0602641 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/MIFIGQEX

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

First, the useful takeaway: this paper does a careful, self-contained one-loop RG analysis of an anisotropic MBE growth model, and it genuinely does find two new universality classes beyond Edwards-Wilkinson—case (i), where only tau_perp is tuned, and case (iii), the multicritical point. The structure of the calculation is honest: dynamic functional, Ward identities from tilt invariance, dimensional regularization, minimal subtraction, and explicit one-loop singular parts. The four-roughness-exponent formulation for strongly anisotropic scaling is a real conceptual contribution; it clears up an ambiguity that earlier papers left implicit.

The central derivation is not circular. No parameters are fitted to data; exponents come from RG fixed points and exponent identities. The authors also state plainly that their one-loop result at d=2 for case (iii), Delta ≈ 16.8, is not meaningful to compare to experiment. That kind of candor is rare and valuable.

The soft spots are exactly where the stress-test note points. The d=2 values for case (i), chi_perp = 1/3 and chi_parallel = 1/9, are derived from an exponent identity that assumes the one-loop IR-stable fixed point u*(epsilon) survives to epsilon=1. The paper calls this a 'reasonable assumption' and provides no resummation, Padé estimate, or simulation check. At one loop u*(1) ≈ 2.3, far outside the small-epsilon regime. Two-loop corrections could shift or destroy the fixed point. So the headline physical claim is load-bearing on an unverified assumption. The same concern applies to case (iii) but there the authors already concede the extrapolation is meaningless.

Second, the citation pattern has one genuine blemish. In the conclusions, they cite their own unpublished manuscript [33] as 'experimental evidence' for the d=2 exponents. That is weak support from a source the reader cannot check. It doesn't enter the derivation, so it's not circular reasoning, but it is thin. Also, the disagreement with Marsili et al. [17] is stated but not resolved; they say they couldn't reproduce the earlier exponents but don't identify the source of the discrepancy. That leaves a loose end.

Overall, this is a solid RG paper with two likely new universality classes and a useful scaling framework. The right move is to send it to a serious referee, with the expectation that the authors address the fixed-point persistence question, perhaps by a higher-loop calculation or a numerical check, and soften the self-citation.

Referee report

Major objections (3)

[§3.3, case (i), after Eq. (28)] The d=2 values χ⊥=1/3 and χ∥=1/9+O(ε²) in Section 4 rest on the 'reasonable assumption' that the resummed fixed point u*(ε) remains real and nonzero at ε=1. At one loop, u*(1)=4/√3≈2.3, far outside the small-ε regime, and the paper provides no resummation, Padé estimate, two-loop check, or numerical simulation to support this persistence. Since the claim of a novel universality class for d=2 surfaces is the paper's central result, this extrapolation is load-bearing and should be either substantiated or explicitly qualified as an ε-expansion prediction rather than an established d=2 result.
[§4, case (iii), after Eq. (56)] The authors themselves write that using one-loop results at d=2 (ε=4) gives Δ≈16.8 and 'it does not appear meaningful to compare them to experimental data.' This concedes that the multicritical universality class is not established in the physical dimension. For case (iii) to be claimed as a d=2 universality class, the paper would need higher-order or non-perturbative evidence that the one-loop fixed point (u⊥*=0, w*=2√3/5−1, u∥*∝ε^{1/2}) persists to ε=4; otherwise the result is valid only near d_c=6 and should be presented as such.
[§4, Eq. (66) and following text] The sentence 'Remarkably, the exponent χ⊥=1/3 is actually exact, at least to all orders in perturbation theory' overstates what has been proven. The identity χ⊥=1−d/3 follows from Eq. (29), which is exact only if the infrared-stable fixed point u*(ε) remains nonzero at the physical dimension. Without a non-perturbative argument or independent verification, the claim of exactness to all orders is conditional on an unverified assumption and should be phrased accordingly.

Minor objections (3)

[§5, Conclusions] The sentence 'There appears to be some experimental evidence for these exponents [33]' cites the authors' own unpublished manuscript [33] as if it were an experimental reference; this is not appropriate. Either cite actual experimental work or state explicitly that the evidence is from the authors' unpublished analysis.
[Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction state flatly that two novel universality classes are found, without noting the ε-expansion caveats that appear later in the paper. A more precise wording, mentioning that the classes are established within the one-loop ε-expansion near the upper critical dimension, would better match the content.
[Figure 1] The phase-diagram sketch labels lines 1 and 2 but does not explicitly connect them to cases (i) and (ii); adding the case labels to the figure would improve readability.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

A growing surface struck at an oblique angle can fall into two new universality classes, one with an exact transverse roughness exponent of 1/3.

The reading

The paper asks what happens to the large-scale shape of a growing surface when the incoming particle beam hits it obliquely instead of head-on. It argues that the tilted beam breaks rotational symmetry in the substrate plane, producing an effective surface tension with two independent components, one along the beam direction and one transverse. Depending on which component vanishes, the surface can develop ripples or mounds; a renormalization-group analysis maps out a phase diagram with a continuous transition line, a possibly first-order line, and a multicritical point. The central result is two new anisotropic universality classes, with a set of four roughness exponents for each; in the case most relevant to experiments, the transverse roughness exponent is exactly $1/3$.

What carries the argument

The engine is the dynamic response functional for the height field $h$ with response field $\tilde h$, analyzed to one loop in dimensional regularization with minimal subtraction. An infinitesimal tilt invariance produces a Ward identity that ties the renormalization of the nonlinear couplings $\lambda_\parallel$ and $\lambda_\perp$ to the two-point vertex function, so only $\Gamma_{1,1}$ needs to be computed. Separate anisotropic scale invariances allow parallel and transverse lengths to be rescaled independently, defining effective dimensionless coupling constants and an anisotropy exponent $\Delta$. For case (i), the effective dimension is $D=d+1$ with $d_c=3$; for case (iii), the stable fixed point has $w^* = 2\sqrt{3}/5 - 1$, $u_\parallel^* \neq 0$, and $u_\perp^* = 0$, and exact exponent identities reduce the scaling behavior to a single computed exponent.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that oblique-incidence surface growth, described by an anisotropic conserved Langevin equation, supports two new universality classes distinct from Edwards-Wilkinson and from the isotropic ideal MBE class. In case (i), where the transverse surface tension vanishes while the parallel one stays positive, the system is controlled by an infrared-stable fixed point with upper critical dimension $d_c=3$; for a two-dimensional substrate this gives transverse roughness exponent $\chi_\perp = 1/3$ exactly to all orders in perturbation theory and parallel roughness exponent $\chi_\parallel = 1/9 + O(\epsilon^2)$. In case (iii), the multicritical point where both surface tensions vanish, the upper critical dimension is $d_c=6$ and the anisotropy exponent is $\Delta = \frac{23+6\sqrt{15}}{11}\epsilon + O(\epsilon^2)$; all four roughness exponents there follow from this single exponent. Case (ii), where the parallel surface tension vanishes while the transverse one stays positive, has no infrared-stable fixed point at one loop and is proposed as a line of potentially first-order transitions. The paper explicitly states that its one-loop multicritical results, taken naively at $d=2$, give $\Delta \simeq 16.8$ and do not appear meaningful to compare with experimental data.

Load-bearing premise

All physical predictions rest on the assumption that the one-loop infrared-stable fixed points found near the upper critical dimension persist down to $d=2$, so that the real surface is controlled by them; the paper itself cautions that the multicritical one-loop result at $d=2$ is too large to compare with experiments.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For a two-dimensional substrate with $\tau_\perp=0$ and $\tau_\parallel>0$, height fluctuations transverse to the beam direction scale with roughness exponent $1/3$ exactly to all orders in perturbation theory, while parallel scans give $1/9 + O(\epsilon^2)$.
At the multicritical point $\tau_\parallel=\tau_\perp=0$, all four roughness exponents are controlled by a single anisotropy exponent $\Delta$; near $d=2$ the one-loop value is so large that direct experimental comparison is not meaningful.
The line $\tau_\parallel\to 0$ with $\tau_\perp>0$ has no infrared-stable fixed point at one loop, so it is a candidate for first-order transitions rather than continuous scaling.
When both surface tensions are positive, the theory reduces to anisotropic Edwards-Wilkinson behavior with roughness exponent $(2-d)/2$ and dynamic exponent $z=2$.
For any genuinely anisotropic universality class, four separate roughness exponents are needed: real-space scans parallel and transverse to the beam, and momentum-space scans with parallel and transverse momentum transfer; they coincide only when the anisotropy exponent $\Delta$ vanishes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper does not state this, but if the one-loop stable fixed point for case (i) persists under resummation, a discrete oblique-incidence growth model with $\tau_\perp=0$ and $\tau_\parallel>0$ should show $\chi_\perp=1/3$; a numerical measurement of height correlations would directly test the predicted universality class.
The paper does not state this, but because the stable multicritical fixed point has $u_\perp^*=0$, a model retaining only the parallel nonlinearity $\lambda_\parallel$ should reproduce the multicritical anisotropy exponent $\Delta$, giving a reduced numerical test.
The paper does not state this, but if the absence of an infrared-stable fixed point in case (ii) survives higher orders, the $\tau_\parallel\to 0$ line should show first-order behavior such as hysteresis or discontinuous growth.

Original abstract

Using renormalized field theory, we examine the dynamics of a growing surface, driven by an obliquely incident particle beam. Its projection on the reference (substrate) plane selects a ``parallel'' direction, so that the evolution equation for the surface height becomes anisotropic. The phase diagram of the model is controlled by the properties of an effective anisotropic surface tension. Our renormalization group analysis suggests the existence of a line of continuous transitions and a line of (potentially) first-order transitions, which meet at a multicritical point. The full scaling behavior for the continuous line and the multicritical point is discussed in detail. Two novel universality classes for scale-invariant surface fluctuations are found.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,851 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.09 · states limitation 0.42 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

Using renormalized field theory, we examine the dynamics of a growing surface, driven by an obliquely incident particle beam. Its projection on the reference (substrate) plane selects a ``parallel'' direction, so that the evolution equation for the surface height becomes anisotropic. The phase diagram of the model is controlled by the properties of an effective anisotropic surface tension. Our renormalization group analysis suggests the existence of a line of continuous transitions and a line of (potentially) first-order transitions, which meet at a multicritical point. The full scaling behavior for the continuous line and the multicritical point is discussed in detail. Two novel universality classes for scale-invariant surface fluctuations are found.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	Using renormalized field theory, we examine the dynamics of a growing surface, driven by an obliquely incident particle beam.	contribution 0.62	0.94	0.03	asserted 0.92
s1	Its projection on the reference (substrate) plane selects a ``parallel'' direction, so that the evolution equation for the surface height becomes anisotropic.	method 0.56	0.36	0.03	asserted 1.00
s2	The phase diagram of the model is controlled by the properties of an effective anisotropic surface tension.	result 0.66	0.47	0.08	asserted 1.00
s3	Our renormalization group analysis suggests the existence of a line of continuous transitions and a line of (potentially) first-order transitions, which meet at a multicritical point.	result 0.98	0.94	0.27	hedged possibility 1.00
s4	The full scaling behavior for the continuous line and the multicritical point is discussed in detail.	contribution 0.82	0.89	0.08	asserted 0.98
s5	Two novel universality classes for scale-invariant surface fluctuations are found.	result 1.00	0.96	0.78	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 1.** Sketch of the phase diagram in (τk, τ⊥) space. EW denotes the Edwards–Wilkinson region. The line labelled 1 marks a line of (possibly) discontinuous transitions, and line 2 corresponds to continuous transitions, both to inhomogeneous structures. The dashed lines denote very qualitative transition linesn between different structures, and mcr labels the multicritical point. can gain some qualitative insight by considering the linear terms first. To ensure stability of the homogeneous phase, the coupling constants µk and µ⊥ must be positive, and the cross-coupling µ× may not exceed…

Figures reproduced from arXiv:cond-mat/0602641 by the authors.

References

Works cited (40)

[33]

H.K. Janssen, Z. Phys. B 23, 377 (1976); R. Bausch, H.K. Janssen, and H. Wagner, Z. Phys. B 24, 113 (1976); H.K. Janssen, in Dynamical Critical Phenomena and Related Topics (Lecture Notes in Physics , Vol. 104), edited by C.P. Enz, (Springer, Heidelberg, 1979)

View on Pith 1976
[17]

M.A. Makeev, R. Cuerno, A.-L. Barab´ asi, Nucl. Instr. and Met h. in Phys. Res. B 197, 185 (2002)

View on Pith 2002
[1]

Introduction The capability to grow nanoscale layers of atoms or molecules on a sub strate forms an important part of modern nanotechnology. Particles emitted fr om a source are deposited on the growing surface whose characteristics are dete rmined by parameters such as growth temperature, surface diﬀusion, bulk relaxation, a nd particle attachment vs det...

View on Pith
[2]

The model If surface overhangs and shadowing eﬀects are neglected, the s urface can be described by a single-valued height ﬁeld, h(r, t ). Here, r denotes a d-dimensional vector in a reference (substrate) plane, and t denotes time. h is measured along the z-axis which is normal to the substrate plane. The no-overhang assumption can be justiﬁe d a posterio...

View on Pith
[3]

Renormalization group analysis 3.1. The dynamic functional To unify the discussion, we ﬁrst recast the Langevin equation (6) a s a dynamic ﬁeld theory. In this formulation, all statistical averages are express ed as path integrals, with weight exp( −J ). In order to treat correlation and response functions in an analo gous manner, it is convenient to intr...

View on Pith
[4]

The roughness exponents The roughness exponents of the surface are easily identiﬁed, onc e the scaling properties of the underlying ﬁeld theory are known. For isotropic theories, th ey can be read oﬀ directly from the height-height correlation function, G2,0(r − r′, t − t′) ≡ C(r − r′, t − t′) ≡ ⟨h(r, t )h(r′, t ′)⟩ if its asymptotic scaling behavior of c...

View on Pith
[5]

Conclusions To summarize, we have analyzed the eﬀect of strong anisotropies o n the universal behavior of a surface grown under ideal MBE-type conditions. The anisotropy is generated by an incident particle beam which is tilted away from the no rmal. This arrangement manifestly breaks rotational invariance in the subst rate plane. As a consequence, the eﬀ...

View on Pith
[6]

J. Krug and P. Meakin, Phys. Rev. A 40, 2064 (1989)

View on Pith 1989
[7]

T. Halpin-Healey, Y.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rep. 254, 215 (1995)

View on Pith 1995
[8]

J. Krug, Adv. Phys. 46, 139 (1997)

View on Pith 1997
[9]

P. Meakin, Phys. Rev. A 38, 994 (1988)

View on Pith 1988
[10]

P. Meakin and J. Krug, Europhys. Lett. 11, 7 (1990)

View on Pith 1990
[11]

P. Meakin and J. Krug, Phys. Rev. A 46, 3390 (1992)

View on Pith 1992
[12]

T. Hwa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1552 (1992)

View on Pith 1992
[13]

M. Kardar, G. Parisi, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 889 (1986)

View on Pith 1986
[14]

S. Bales, A.C. Redﬁeld, and A. Zangwill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 776 (1989)

View on Pith 1989
[15]

+ O(ε) ) τ⊥ . (57) Let us brieﬂy return to the assumption that the stable ﬁxed point is characterized by u∗ ⊥ = 0. Thanks to Eq. (45) and the associated linear stability matrix, we can determine the stability criterion, i.e., the correction-to-scaling exp onent of u⊥, to all orders in perturbation theory. The condition for u∗ ⊥ = 0 to be stable is 4 ε < 3...

View on Pith
[16]

F. Ojeda, R. Cuerno, R. Salvarezza, and L. Vazqu´ ez, Phys. R ev. Lett. 84, 3125 (2000)

View on Pith 2000
[18]

D.E. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1783 (1991)

View on Pith 1991
[19]

U.C. T¨ auber and E. Frey, Europhys. Lett. 59, 655 (2002)

View on Pith 2002
[20]

Kinetics of Ordering and Growth at Surfaces , edited by M. Lagally (Plenum, New York 1990)

View on Pith 1990
[21]

S. Das Sarma, Comp. Mat. Sc. 6, 149 (1996)

View on Pith 1996
[22]

J. Krug, Physica A 313, 47 (2002)

View on Pith 2002
[23]

M. Marsili, A. Maritan, F. Toigo, and J.R. Banavar, Europhys. Le tt. 35, 171 (1996)

View on Pith 1996
[24]

D. E. Wolf and J. Villain, Europhys. Lett. 13, 389 (1990); LaiDasSarma:1991Z.-W. Lai and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2348 (1991)

View on Pith 1990
[25]

J. Villain, J. Phys. I (France) 1, 19 (1991)

View on Pith 1991
[26]

H.K. Janssen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1082 (1996)

View on Pith 1996
[27]

H.J. Leamy, G.H. Gilmer, and A.G. Dirks, in Current Topics in Materials Science , Vol. 6, edited by E. Kaldis (North-Holland, Amsterdam,1980); A.D. Mazor, J. Srolo vitz, P.S. Hagan, and B.G. Bukiet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 424 (1988); M. Marsili, A. Maritan, F. Toigo, and J.R. Banavar, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 963 (1996)

View on Pith 1988
[28]

W.W. Mullins, Solid surface morphologies governed by capillarity. In : Metal Surfaces: Structure, Energetics and Kinetics , edited by N.A. Gjostein and W.D. Robertson (Metals Park, Ohio: American Society of Metals 1963)

View on Pith 1963
[29]

R.L. Schwoebel and E.J. Shipsey, J. Appl. Phys. 37, 3682 (1966)

View on Pith 1966
[30]

R.L. Schwoebel, J. Appl. Phys. 40, 614 (1969)

View on Pith 1969
[31]

T. Sun, H. Guo, and M. Grant, Phys. Rev. 40, 6763 (1989)

View on Pith 1989
[32]

S.F. Edwards and D.R. Wilkinson, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 381, 17

View on Pith
[34]

C. DeDominicis, J. Phys. (France) Colloq. 37, C247 (1976); C. DeDominicis and L. Peliti, Phys. Rev. B 18, 353 (1978)

View on Pith 1976
[35]

H.K. Janssen, in From Phase Transitions to Chaos , edited by G. Gy¨ orgyi, I. Kondor, L. Sasv´ ari, and T. T´ el, (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1992)

View on Pith 1992
[36]

D.J. Amit, Field Theory, the Renormalization Group and Critical Pheno mena, 2nd revised edition, (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1989)

View on Pith 1989
[37]

J.Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena , 3rd edition (Clarendon, Oxford, 1996)

View on Pith 1996
[38]

F.J. Wegner, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , Vol. 6, eds. C. Domb and M.S. Green (Academic Press, New York, 1976)

View on Pith 1976
[39]

B. Schmittmann, Gunnar Pruessner, and H.K. Janssen, to be s ubmitted to Physical Review B (2006)

View on Pith 2006
[40]

This is analogous to the scaling of driven diﬀusive systems and Lifs hitz points. See, e.g., B. Schmittmann and R.K.P. Zia, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , Vol. 17, eds. C. Domb and J.L. Lebowitz (Academic Press, New York 1995)

View on Pith 1995

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [33]

H.K. Janssen, Z. Phys. B 23, 377 (1976); R. Bausch, H.K. Janssen, and H. Wagner, Z. Phys. B 24, 113 (1976); H.K. Janssen, in Dynamical Critical Phenomena and Related Topics (Lecture Notes in Physics , Vol. 104), edited by C.P. Enz, (Springer, Heidelberg, 1979)

View on Pith 1976

[2] [17]

M.A. Makeev, R. Cuerno, A.-L. Barab´ asi, Nucl. Instr. and Met h. in Phys. Res. B 197, 185 (2002)

View on Pith 2002

[3] [1]

Introduction The capability to grow nanoscale layers of atoms or molecules on a sub strate forms an important part of modern nanotechnology. Particles emitted fr om a source are deposited on the growing surface whose characteristics are dete rmined by parameters such as growth temperature, surface diﬀusion, bulk relaxation, a nd particle attachment vs det...

View on Pith

[4] [2]

The model If surface overhangs and shadowing eﬀects are neglected, the s urface can be described by a single-valued height ﬁeld, h(r, t ). Here, r denotes a d-dimensional vector in a reference (substrate) plane, and t denotes time. h is measured along the z-axis which is normal to the substrate plane. The no-overhang assumption can be justiﬁe d a posterio...

View on Pith

[5] [3]

Renormalization group analysis 3.1. The dynamic functional To unify the discussion, we ﬁrst recast the Langevin equation (6) a s a dynamic ﬁeld theory. In this formulation, all statistical averages are express ed as path integrals, with weight exp( −J ). In order to treat correlation and response functions in an analo gous manner, it is convenient to intr...

View on Pith

[6] [4]

The roughness exponents The roughness exponents of the surface are easily identiﬁed, onc e the scaling properties of the underlying ﬁeld theory are known. For isotropic theories, th ey can be read oﬀ directly from the height-height correlation function, G2,0(r − r′, t − t′) ≡ C(r − r′, t − t′) ≡ ⟨h(r, t )h(r′, t ′)⟩ if its asymptotic scaling behavior of c...

View on Pith

[7] [5]

Conclusions To summarize, we have analyzed the eﬀect of strong anisotropies o n the universal behavior of a surface grown under ideal MBE-type conditions. The anisotropy is generated by an incident particle beam which is tilted away from the no rmal. This arrangement manifestly breaks rotational invariance in the subst rate plane. As a consequence, the eﬀ...

View on Pith

[8] [6]

J. Krug and P. Meakin, Phys. Rev. A 40, 2064 (1989)

View on Pith 1989

[9] [7]

T. Halpin-Healey, Y.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rep. 254, 215 (1995)

View on Pith 1995

[10] [8]

J. Krug, Adv. Phys. 46, 139 (1997)

View on Pith 1997

[11] [9]

P. Meakin, Phys. Rev. A 38, 994 (1988)

View on Pith 1988

[12] [10]

P. Meakin and J. Krug, Europhys. Lett. 11, 7 (1990)

View on Pith 1990

[13] [11]

P. Meakin and J. Krug, Phys. Rev. A 46, 3390 (1992)

View on Pith 1992

[14] [12]

T. Hwa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1552 (1992)

View on Pith 1992

[15] [13]

M. Kardar, G. Parisi, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 889 (1986)

View on Pith 1986

[16] [14]

S. Bales, A.C. Redﬁeld, and A. Zangwill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 776 (1989)

View on Pith 1989

[17] [15]

+ O(ε) ) τ⊥ . (57) Let us brieﬂy return to the assumption that the stable ﬁxed point is characterized by u∗ ⊥ = 0. Thanks to Eq. (45) and the associated linear stability matrix, we can determine the stability criterion, i.e., the correction-to-scaling exp onent of u⊥, to all orders in perturbation theory. The condition for u∗ ⊥ = 0 to be stable is 4 ε < 3...

View on Pith

[18] [16]

F. Ojeda, R. Cuerno, R. Salvarezza, and L. Vazqu´ ez, Phys. R ev. Lett. 84, 3125 (2000)

View on Pith 2000

[19] [18]

D.E. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1783 (1991)

View on Pith 1991

[20] [19]

U.C. T¨ auber and E. Frey, Europhys. Lett. 59, 655 (2002)

View on Pith 2002

[21] [20]

Kinetics of Ordering and Growth at Surfaces , edited by M. Lagally (Plenum, New York 1990)

View on Pith 1990

[22] [21]

S. Das Sarma, Comp. Mat. Sc. 6, 149 (1996)

View on Pith 1996

[23] [22]

J. Krug, Physica A 313, 47 (2002)

View on Pith 2002

[24] [23]

M. Marsili, A. Maritan, F. Toigo, and J.R. Banavar, Europhys. Le tt. 35, 171 (1996)

View on Pith 1996

[25] [24]

D. E. Wolf and J. Villain, Europhys. Lett. 13, 389 (1990); LaiDasSarma:1991Z.-W. Lai and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2348 (1991)

View on Pith 1990

[26] [25]

J. Villain, J. Phys. I (France) 1, 19 (1991)

View on Pith 1991

[27] [26]

H.K. Janssen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1082 (1996)

View on Pith 1996

[28] [27]

H.J. Leamy, G.H. Gilmer, and A.G. Dirks, in Current Topics in Materials Science , Vol. 6, edited by E. Kaldis (North-Holland, Amsterdam,1980); A.D. Mazor, J. Srolo vitz, P.S. Hagan, and B.G. Bukiet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 424 (1988); M. Marsili, A. Maritan, F. Toigo, and J.R. Banavar, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 963 (1996)

View on Pith 1988

[29] [28]

W.W. Mullins, Solid surface morphologies governed by capillarity. In : Metal Surfaces: Structure, Energetics and Kinetics , edited by N.A. Gjostein and W.D. Robertson (Metals Park, Ohio: American Society of Metals 1963)

View on Pith 1963

[30] [29]

R.L. Schwoebel and E.J. Shipsey, J. Appl. Phys. 37, 3682 (1966)

View on Pith 1966

[31] [30]

R.L. Schwoebel, J. Appl. Phys. 40, 614 (1969)

View on Pith 1969

[32] [31]

T. Sun, H. Guo, and M. Grant, Phys. Rev. 40, 6763 (1989)

View on Pith 1989

[33] [32]

S.F. Edwards and D.R. Wilkinson, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 381, 17

View on Pith

[34] [34]

C. DeDominicis, J. Phys. (France) Colloq. 37, C247 (1976); C. DeDominicis and L. Peliti, Phys. Rev. B 18, 353 (1978)

View on Pith 1976

[35] [35]

H.K. Janssen, in From Phase Transitions to Chaos , edited by G. Gy¨ orgyi, I. Kondor, L. Sasv´ ari, and T. T´ el, (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1992)

View on Pith 1992

[36] [36]

D.J. Amit, Field Theory, the Renormalization Group and Critical Pheno mena, 2nd revised edition, (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1989)

View on Pith 1989

[37] [37]

J.Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena , 3rd edition (Clarendon, Oxford, 1996)

View on Pith 1996

[38] [38]

F.J. Wegner, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , Vol. 6, eds. C. Domb and M.S. Green (Academic Press, New York, 1976)

View on Pith 1976

[39] [39]

B. Schmittmann, Gunnar Pruessner, and H.K. Janssen, to be s ubmitted to Physical Review B (2006)

View on Pith 2006

[40] [40]

This is analogous to the scaling of driven diﬀusive systems and Lifs hitz points. See, e.g., B. Schmittmann and R.K.P. Zia, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , Vol. 17, eds. C. Domb and J.L. Lebowitz (Academic Press, New York 1995)

View on Pith 1995