Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Social Force Model for Pedestrian Dynamics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv cond-mat/9805244 v1 pith:437CMULM submitted 1998-05-20 cond-mat.stat-mech nlin.PSpatt-sol

Social Force Model for Pedestrian Dynamics

classification cond-mat.stat-mech nlin.PSpatt-sol
keywords forcepedestrianpedestriansmodelmotionsocialbehaviorcertain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

It is suggested that the motion of pedestrians can be described as if they would be subject to `social forces'. These `forces' are not directly exerted by the pedestrians' personal environment, but they are a measure for the internal motivations of the individuals to perform certain actions (movements). The corresponding force concept is discussed in more detail and can be also applied to the description of other behaviors. In the presented model of pedestrian behavior several force terms are essential: First, a term describing the acceleration towards the desired velocity of motion. Second, terms reflecting that a pedestrian keeps a certain distance to other pedestrians and borders. Third, a term modeling attractive effects. The resulting equations of motion are nonlinearly coupled Langevin equations. Computer simulations of crowds of interacting pedestrians show that the social force model is capable of describing the self-organization of several observed collective effects of pedestrian behavior very realistically.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Safe Autonomous Driving Under Pedestrian Behavioral Uncertainty

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Co-training an SDC and 12 pedestrians with MAPPO in a MARL setup yields 78% goal success and 14% collisions versus 35% goals and 33% for the best rule-based baseline, with jaywalking linked to 62% of collisions despit...

  2. Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Safe Autonomous Driving Under Pedestrian Behavioral Uncertainty

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Co-training an SDC and pedestrians with MAPPO yields 78% goal success and 14% collisions versus 35%/33% for rule-based baselines, with jaywalking causing 62% of collisions and evidence of poor anticipation via speed d...