pith. sign in

arxiv: cond-mat/9912346 · v1 · submitted 1999-12-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Effect of the sample geometry on the second magnetization peak in single crystalline Ba_(0.63)K_(0.37)BiO₃ thick film

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords filmgeometrymagnetizationsamplecrystallinedependenceeffectpeak
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Magnetization hysteresis loop $M(H)$ measurements performed on a single crystalline Ba$_{0.63}$K$_{0.37}$BiO$_3$ superconducting thick film reveal pronounced sample geometry dependence of the "second magnetization peak" (SMP), i.e. a maximum in the width of $M(H)$ occurring at the field $H_{\rm SMP}(T)$. In particular, it is found that the SMP vanishes decreasing the film dimension. We argue that the observed sample geometry dependence of the SMP cannot be accounted for by models which assume a vortex pinning enhancement as the origin of the SMP. Our results can be understood considering the thermomagnetic instability effect and/or non-uniform current distribution at $H < H_{\rm SMP}$ in large enough samples.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.