Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fuzzy Extractors: How to Generate Strong Keys from Biometrics and Other Noisy Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv cs/0602007 v4 pith:I4TR2SP3 submitted 2006-02-04 cs.CR cs.ITmath.IT

classification cs.CRcs.ITmath.IT
keywords inputbiometriccryptographicdatainformationkeysprimitivesreliably
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We provide formal definitions and efficient secure techniques for - turning noisy information into keys usable for any cryptographic application, and, in particular, - reliably and securely authenticating biometric data. Our techniques apply not just to biometric information, but to any keying material that, unlike traditional cryptographic keys, is (1) not reproducible precisely and (2) not distributed uniformly. We propose two primitives: a "fuzzy extractor" reliably extracts nearly uniform randomness R from its input; the extraction is error-tolerant in the sense that R will be the same even if the input changes, as long as it remains reasonably close to the original. Thus, R can be used as a key in a cryptographic application. A "secure sketch" produces public information about its input w that does not reveal w, and yet allows exact recovery of w given another value that is close to w. Thus, it can be used to reliably reproduce error-prone biometric inputs without incurring the security risk inherent in storing them. We define the primitives to be both formally secure and versatile, generalizing much prior work. In addition, we provide nearly optimal constructions of both primitives for various measures of ``closeness'' of input data, such as Hamming distance, edit distance, and set difference.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How to Verify that a Small Device is Quantum, Unconditionally

    quant-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The authors construct proofs of quantumness whose soundness is unconditional against memory-bounded classical adversaries, using Raz's parity-learning lower bound and bounded-storage interactive hashing.

Pith tools