pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: cs/9908014 · v1 · submitted 1999-08-17 · 💻 cs.LG · adap-org· cond-mat· cs.DC· cs.MA· nlin.AO

Recognition: unknown

An Introduction to Collective Intelligence

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.LG adap-orgcond-matcs.DCcs.MAnlin.AO
keywords coindesignproblemagentsothersystemwillalgorithms
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper surveys the emerging science of how to design a ``COllective INtelligence'' (COIN). A COIN is a large multi-agent system where: (i) There is little to no centralized communication or control; and (ii) There is a provided world utility function that rates the possible histories of the full system. In particular, we are interested in COINs in which each agent runs a reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm. Rather than use a conventional modeling approach (e.g., model the system dynamics, and hand-tune agents to cooperate), we aim to solve the COIN design problem implicitly, via the ``adaptive'' character of the RL algorithms of each of the agents. This approach introduces an entirely new, profound design problem: Assuming the RL algorithms are able to achieve high rewards, what reward functions for the individual agents will, when pursued by those agents, result in high world utility? In other words, what reward functions will best ensure that we do not have phenomena like the tragedy of the commons, Braess's paradox, or the liquidity trap? Although still very young, research specifically concentrating on the COIN design problem has already resulted in successes in artificial domains, in particular in packet-routing, the leader-follower problem, and in variants of Arthur's El Farol bar problem. It is expected that as it matures and draws upon other disciplines related to COINs, this research will greatly expand the range of tasks addressable by human engineers. Moreover, in addition to drawing on them, such a fully developed scie nce of COIN design may provide much insight into other already established scientific fields, such as economics, game theory, and population biology.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Superminds Test: Actively Evaluating Collective Intelligence of Agent Society via Probing Agents

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Large-scale experiments on two million agents reveal that collective intelligence does not emerge from scale alone due to sparse and shallow interactions.