Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Two-Dilaton Theories in Two Dimensions from Dimensional Reduction

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 23 May 2000

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show that practically all physically motivated models belong either to the class of factorizable simple theories (e.g. dimensionally reduced gravity, bosonic string) or to factorizable conformally simple theories (e.g. spherically reduced Scalar-Tensor theories).

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDgr-qc/0005098 (version 2)
Pith IDUKAO4T2W, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationD. Grumiller, D. Hofmann, W. Kummer. "Two-Dilaton Theories in Two Dimensions from Dimensional Reduction." arXiv:gr-qc/0005098 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/UKAO4T2W
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,549 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.93 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.23 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Dimensional reduction of generalized gravity theories or string theories generically yields dilaton fields in the lower-dimensional effective theory. Thus at the level of D=4 theories, and cosmology many models contain more than just one scalar field (e.g. inflaton, Higgs, quintessence). Our present work is restricted to two-dimensional gravity theories with only two dilatons which nevertheless allow a large class of physical applications. The notions of factorizability, simplicity and conformal simplicity, Einstein form and Jordan form are the basis of an adequate classification. We show that practically all physically motivated models belong either to the class of factorizable simple theories (e.g. dimensionally reduced gravity, bosonic string) or to factorizable conformally simple theories (e.g. spherically reduced Scalar-Tensor theories). For these theories a first order formulation is constructed straightforwardly. As a consequence an absolute conservation law can be established.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Dimensional reduction of generalized gravity theories or string theories generically yields dilaton fields in the lower-dimensional effective theory. background 1.00 0.06 0.03 asserted 0.89
s1 Thus at the level of D=4 theories, and cosmology many models contain more than just one scalar field (e.g. inflaton, Higgs, quintessence). background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 0.85
s2 Our present work is restricted to two-dimensional gravity theories with only two dilatons which nevertheless allow a large class of physical applications. limitation 0.97 0.55 0.05 asserted 0.99
s3 The notions of factorizability, simplicity and conformal simplicity, Einstein form and Jordan form are the basis of an adequate classification. method 0.68 0.40 0.08 asserted 1.00
s4 We show that practically all physically motivated models belong either to the class of factorizable simple theories (e.g. dimensionally reduced gravity, bosonic string) or to factorizable conformally simple theories (e.g. spherically reduced Scalar-Tensor theories). result 0.94 0.89 0.74 asserted 1.00
s5 For these theories a first order formulation is constructed straightforwardly. contribution 0.48 0.91 0.11 asserted 1.00
s6 As a consequence an absolute conservation law can be established. result 0.96 0.87 0.25 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.96 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Dimensional reduction of generalized gravity theories or string theories generically yields dilaton fields in the lower-dimensional effective theory. Thus at the level of D=4 theories, and cosmology many models contain more than just one scalar field (e.g. inflaton, Higgs, quintessence). Our present work is restricted to two-dimensional gravity theories with only two dilatons which nevertheless allow a large class of physical applications. The notions of factorizability, simplicity and conformal simplicity, Einstein form and Jordan form are the basis of an adequate classification. We show that practically all physically motivated models belong either to the class of factorizable simple theories (e.g. dimensionally reduced gravity, bosonic string) or to factorizable conformally simple theories (e.g. spherically reduced Scalar-Tensor theories). For these theories a first order formulation is constructed straightforwardly. As a consequence an absolute conservation law can be established.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.