Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The structure of non-spacelike geodesics in dust collapse

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
S. S. Deshingkar, P. S. Joshi

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 4 Oct 2000

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We also bring out the similarity of the limiting behaviour for different types of geodesics in the limit of approach to the singularity.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDgr-qc/0010015 (version 1)
Pith IDBMQUVA6E, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationP. S. Joshi, S. S. Deshingkar. "The structure of non-spacelike geodesics in dust collapse." arXiv:gr-qc/0010015 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/BMQUVA6E
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,908 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.11 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study here the behaviour of non-spacelike geodesics in dust collapse models in order to understand the casual structure of the spacetime. The geodesic families coming out, when the singularity is naked, corresponding to different initial data are worked out and analyzed. We also bring out the similarity of the limiting behaviour for different types of geodesics in the limit of approach to the singularity.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study here the behaviour of non-spacelike geodesics in dust collapse models in order to understand the casual structure of the spacetime. contribution 0.95 0.88 0.06 asserted 0.78
s1 The geodesic families coming out, when the singularity is naked, corresponding to different initial data are worked out and analyzed. contribution 0.84 0.93 0.16 asserted 0.98
s2 We also bring out the similarity of the limiting behaviour for different types of geodesics in the limit of approach to the singularity. result 0.96 0.92 0.28 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study here the behaviour of non-spacelike geodesics in dust collapse models in order to understand the casual structure of the spacetime. The geodesic families coming out, when the singularity is naked, corresponding to different initial data are worked out and analyzed. We also bring out the similarity of the limiting behaviour for different types of geodesics in the limit of approach to the singularity.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.