Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Observables, gauge invariance, and the role of the observers in the limit from general relativity to special relativity

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 6 Apr 2001

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Whether and when the Poincar\'e group must be considered as a residual gauge group will come out as a result of our analysis, that applies, in particular, to asymptotically flat spaces.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.48 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDgr-qc/0104021 (version 2)
Pith IDVIQD724Q, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJ. M. Pons. "Observables, gauge invariance, and the role of the observers in the limit from general relativity to special relativity." arXiv:gr-qc/0104021 (2001). https://pith.science/paper/VIQD724Q
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,969 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.18 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.02 · compares with prior results 0.09 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Some conceptual issues concerning general invariant theories, with special emphasis on general relativity, are analyzed. The common assertion that observables must be required to be gauge invariant is examined in the light of the role played by a system of observers. Some features of the reduction of the gauge group are discussed, including the fact that in the process of a partial gauge fixing the reduction at the level of the gauge group and the reduction at the level of the variational principle do not commute. Distinctions between the mathematical and the physical concept of gauge symmetry are discussed and illustrated with examples. The limit from general relativity to special relativity is considered as an example of a gauge group reduction that is allowed in some specific physical circumstances. Whether and when the Poincar\'e group must be considered as a residual gauge group will come out as a result of our analysis, that applies, in particular, to asymptotically flat spaces.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Some conceptual issues concerning general invariant theories, with special emphasis on general relativity, are analyzed. contribution 0.58 0.77 0.03 asserted 0.79
s1 The common assertion that observables must be required to be gauge invariant is examined in the light of the role played by a system of observers. contribution 0.76 0.39 0.10 unclear 0.82
s2 Some features of the reduction of the gauge group are discussed, including the fact that in the process of a partial gauge fixing the reduction at the level of the gauge group and the reduction at the level of the variational principle do not commute. result 0.61 0.50 0.07 asserted 0.99
s3 Distinctions between the mathematical and the physical concept of gauge symmetry are discussed and illustrated with examples. contribution 0.97 0.63 0.04 asserted 0.95
s4 The limit from general relativity to special relativity is considered as an example of a gauge group reduction that is allowed in some specific physical circumstances. contribution 0.66 0.41 0.09 asserted 0.73
s5 Whether and when the Poincar\'e group must be considered as a residual gauge group will come out as a result of our analysis, that applies, in particular, to asymptotically flat spaces. result 0.57 0.53 0.23 hedged possibility 0.48

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: position or commentary 0.72 · evidence from argument 0.91.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Some conceptual issues concerning general invariant theories, with special emphasis on general relativity, are analyzed. The common assertion that observables must be required to be gauge invariant is examined in the light of the role played by a system of observers. Some features of the reduction of the gauge group are discussed, including the fact that in the process of a partial gauge fixing the reduction at the level of the gauge group and the reduction at the level of the variational principle do not commute. Distinctions between the mathematical and the physical concept of gauge symmetry are discussed and illustrated with examples. The limit from general relativity to special relativity is considered as an example of a gauge group reduction that is allowed in some specific physical circumstances. Whether and when the Poincar\'e group must be considered as a residual gauge group will come out as a result of our analysis, that applies, in particular, to asymptotically flat spaces.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.