Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Patrick J. Sutton, Masaki Ando, Patrick Brady, Laura Cadonati, Alessandra Di Credico, Stephen Fairhurst, Lee Samuel Finn, Nobuyuki Kanda
show 13 more authors
Erik Katsavounidis, Sergey Klimenko, Albert Lazzarini, Szabolcs Marka, John W. C. McNabb, Saikat Ray Majumder, Peter R. Saulson, Hideyuki Tagoshi, Hirotaka Takahashi, Ryutaro Takahashi, Daisuke Tatsumi, Yoshiki Tsunesada, S. E. Whitcomb

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 28 Dec 2004

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We describe the plans for a joint search for unmodelled gravitational wave bursts being carried out by the LIGO and TAMA collaborations using data collected during February-April 2003.

how it is stated · asserted 0.98 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDgr-qc/0412123 (version 1)
Pith IDTVHF4Z75, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAlbert Lazzarini, Alessandra Di Credico, Daisuke Tatsumi, Erik Katsavounidis, Hideyuki Tagoshi, Hirotaka Takahashi, John W. C. McNabb, Laura Cadonati, Lee Samuel Finn, Masaki Ando, Nobuyuki Kanda, Patrick Brady, Patrick J. Sutton, Peter R. Saulson, Ryutaro Takahashi, Saikat Ray Majumder, Sergey Klimenko, S. E. Whitcomb, Stephen Fairhurst, Szabolcs Marka, Yoshiki Tsunesada. "Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts." arXiv:gr-qc/0412123 (2004). https://pith.science/paper/TVHF4Z75
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,957 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.69 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.07 · compares with prior results 0.05 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We describe the plans for a joint search for unmodelled gravitational wave bursts being carried out by the LIGO and TAMA collaborations using data collected during February-April 2003. We take a conservative approach to detection, requiring candidate gravitational wave bursts to be seen in coincidence by all four interferometers. We focus on some of the complications of performing this coincidence analysis, in particular the effects of the different alignments and noise spectra of the interferometers.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We describe the plans for a joint search for unmodelled gravitational wave bursts being carried out by the LIGO and TAMA collaborations using data collected during February-April 2003. contribution 0.98 0.80 0.12 asserted 0.98
s1 We take a conservative approach to detection, requiring candidate gravitational wave bursts to be seen in coincidence by all four interferometers. method 0.99 0.64 0.10 asserted 0.98
s2 We focus on some of the complications of performing this coincidence analysis, in particular the effects of the different alignments and noise spectra of the interferometers. method 0.58 0.41 0.06 asserted 0.81

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: position or commentary 0.85 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.80.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We describe the plans for a joint search for unmodelled gravitational wave bursts being carried out by the LIGO and TAMA collaborations using data collected during February-April 2003. We take a conservative approach to detection, requiring candidate gravitational wave bursts to be seen in coincidence by all four interferometers. We focus on some of the complications of performing this coincidence analysis, in particular the effects of the different alignments and noise spectra of the interferometers.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.