Pith. Sign in

REVIEW

Rotating charged Black Holes in Einstein-Born-Infeld theories and their ADM mass

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 16 Mar 2006 · 23 references

Pith's verdict: The Born-Infeld modification of ADM angular momentum is a misreading of the metric—the 1/r cross term gives J = a M_ADM, so the claimed a_ADM is a red herring.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on August 28, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

  1. T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
  2. T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
  3. T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
  4. T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
  5. T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 5 major objections · 4 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →
Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDgr-qc/0603066 (version 2)
Pith IDYEFBFA7O, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDiego Julio Cirilo-Lombardo. "Rotating charged Black Holes in Einstein-Born-Infeld theories and their ADM mass." arXiv:gr-qc/0603066 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/YEFBFA7O
Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper
Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Referee report
The paper

The paper claims

Einstein-Born-Infeld rotating black holes carry nonzero ADM mass and angular momentum even when the Kerr-Newman parameters M and a_KN are set to zero.

The reading

This paper constructs a slowly rotating black hole solution in Einstein-Born-Infeld theory and reads off its conserved charges at infinity. Its central claim is that the nonlinear electromagnetic field of a Born-Infeld charge does more than dress a Kerr-Newman metric: it shifts both the ADM mass and the ADM angular momentum. As a result, setting the usual Kerr-Newman integration constants M and a_KN to zero leaves a nontrivial, asymptotically flat rotating spacetime whose mass and spin come from the charge, the Born-Infeld parameter b, and the geometric parameter a. The paper also claims that for some values of b the family admits regular horizons with $M^2 < a_{\mathrm{ADM}}^2 + Q^2$, a regime forbidden by the standard Kerr-Newman inequality. A careful reader would care because this gives a concrete way nonlinear electrodynamics could change the asymptotic charges of a black hole, not just its interior.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Boyer-Lindquist ansatz $\Delta(r,\theta)$ with $\rho^2 = r^2 + a^2\cos^2\theta$, together with the tetrad (orthonormal-frame) form of the Born-Infeld Lagrangian and its energy-momentum tensor, which feeds the Einstein equation $2 + \partial_r\partial_r\Delta = 2(8\pi)(T_{11}+T_{22})$. The exact source term is not elementary, so the derivation expands in slow rotation ($a/r \ll 1$) and matches boundary conditions to Kerr-Newman. The quantity that carries the claim is $\Delta$ itself: its $1/r$ coefficient is the ADM mass and its constant term encodes the ADM angular momentum. The Born-Infeld parameter enters through $r_0=\sqrt{Q/b}$, and the numerical coefficients (1.854 from the static monopole, plus 1.525, 2.8653, and 0.8576) come from elliptic and hypergeometric integrals in the expansion.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that asymptotic flatness does not force the rotating Einstein-Born-Infeld solution to carry only the integration constants of Kerr-Newman. Writing the slowly rotating solution in the Boyer-Lindquist form and expanding in $a/r \ll 1$, the metric function $\Delta(r,\theta)$ develops a large-distance expansion whose $1/r$ term is $2M + \frac{Q^2}{r_0}\left(\frac{4}{3}\cdot 1.854 - 1.525\,\frac{2a^2}{r_0^2} - 2.8653\,\frac{2a^4}{r_0^4}\right)$. Reading the corresponding asymptotic charges gives $$M_{\mathrm{ADM}} = M + \frac{$Q^{2}$}{r_0}\left(\frac{2}{3}\cdot 1.854 - 1.525\,\frac{$a^{2}$}{$r_0^{2}$} - 2.8653\,\frac{$a^{4}$}{$r_0^{4}$}\right), \qquad a_{\mathrm{ADM}}^2 = a_{\mathrm{KN}}^2 + 0.8576\,\frac{$2a^{4}$$Q^{2}$}{$r_0^{4}$}.$$ Hence $M=0$ and $a_{\mathrm{KN}}=0$ does not return an empty or static geometry; the Born-Infeld charge alone fixes a nonzero four-momentum and angular momentum at infinity. The author further claims that for suitable $r_0 = \sqrt{Q/b}$, regular-horizon solutions exist in the regime $M^2 < a_{\mathrm{ADM}}^2 + Q^2$, including $M<0$ choices, with $M_{\mathrm{ADM}}$ bounded below by the absence of naked singularities.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes from the outset that the metric function $\rho^2$ equals the Kerr-Newman Boyer-Lindquist expression $r^2+a^2\cos^2\theta$, although the text says this follows from symmetries and Bianchi identities; those identities constrain the Riemann tensor, not the choice of $\rho$, so this is an ansatz restriction rather than a derived result, and the solution and its ADM formulas stand or fall with it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The total mass read off at infinity is not just the integration constant M; nonlinear Born-Infeld electromagnetism contributes a positive term proportional to $Q^2/r_0$, along with corrections of order $a^2/r_0^2$ and $a^4/r_0^4$ that mix charge and rotation.
  • The ADM angular momentum parameter is not simply the Kerr-Newman parameter $a_{\mathrm{KN}}$; an additional term $0.8576\cdot 2a^4Q^2/r_0^4$ appears, so even with $a_{\mathrm{KN}}=0$ the spacetime carries intrinsic angular momentum.
  • Setting $M=0$ and $a_{\mathrm{KN}}=0$ leaves a rotating, asymptotically flat black hole sourced entirely by the nonlinear field and the geometric parameter $a$, rather than by conventional Kerr-Newman hair.
  • For particular choices of the Born-Infeld parameter, regular-horizon solutions exist in the regime $M^2 < a_{\mathrm{ADM}}^2 + Q^2$, including cases with negative bare mass parameter M, with $M_{\mathrm{ADM}}$ required to stay positive to avoid naked singularities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the formulas survive an exact treatment, the multipole structure of a rotating EBI black hole differs from Kerr-Newman already at low orders: the $a^4$ spin term changes the asymptotic angular momentum even when the Kerr parameter vanishes, so gravitational-wave or accretion observables could in principle distinguish nonlinear electrodynamic charge from standard hair.
  • The claimed $M_{\mathrm{ADM}}>0$ bound for $M<0$ is less a failure of the positive-mass theorem than a signal that Born-Infeld matter violates one of the theorem's hypotheses; checking which energy condition fails would sharpen the theorem for nonlinear electromagnetism.
  • Because the strictly static limit ($a=0$) reproduces the known EBI mass correction, the genuinely testable content of this paper is the $a^2$ and $a^4$ cross terms; computing their effect on horizon radius and black-hole shadow shape could give a direct observational handle on the Born-Infeld parameter $b$.
Original abstract

In this work, the solution of the Einstein equations for a slowly rotating black hole with Born-Infeld charge is obtained. Geometrical properties and horizons of this solution are analyzed. The conditions when the ADM mass (as in the nonlinear static cases) and the ADM angular momentum of the system have been modified by the non linear electromagnetic field of the black hole, are considered.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,895 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.34 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.30 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this work, the solution of the Einstein equations for a slowly rotating black hole with Born-Infeld charge is obtained. Geometrical properties and horizons of this solution are analyzed. The conditions when the ADM mass (as in the nonlinear static cases) and the ADM angular momentum of the system have been modified by the non linear electromagnetic field of the black hole, are considered.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this work, the solution of the Einstein equations for a slowly rotating black hole with Born-Infeld charge is obtained. contribution 0.96 0.95 0.14 asserted 1.00
s1 Geometrical properties and horizons of this solution are analyzed. contribution 0.86 0.90 0.06 asserted 0.95
s2 The conditions when the ADM mass (as in the nonlinear static cases) and the ADM angular momentum of the system have been modified by the non linear electromagnetic field of the black hole, are considered. contribution 0.65 0.70 0.33 unclear 0.50

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 5 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
  • That is why here we approach the rotating generalization more modestly – by considering a slow rotation approximation.[While some of the studies claim to have considered slowly rotating solutions in NLE, e.g. [ref] , as we shall see below, this is not really the case because of the incorrect ansatz for such solutions.]

    Slowly rotating black holes in nonlinear electrodynamics · Introduction · contest 0.92

Cites it as background 2 papers

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.