RECORD
Notes on the (2+1)-Dimensional Wheeler-DeWitt Equation
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 2 Sep 1993
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim In particular, strong evidence is presented that Wheeler-DeWitt quantization is not equivalent to reduced phase space quantization.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
In contrast to other approaches to (2+1)-dimensional quantum gravity, the Wheeler-DeWitt equation appears to be too complicated to solve explicitly, even for simple spacetime topologies. Nevertheless, it is possible to obtain a good deal of information about solutions and their interpretation. In particular, strong evidence is presented that Wheeler-DeWitt quantization is not equivalent to reduced phase space quantization.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | In contrast to other approaches to (2+1)-dimensional quantum gravity, the Wheeler-DeWitt equation appears to be too complicated to solve explicitly, even for simple spacetime topologies. | background 0.91 | 0.12 | 0.05 | hedged possibility 0.82 |
| s1 | Nevertheless, it is possible to obtain a good deal of information about solutions and their interpretation. | contribution 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.06 | hedged possibility 0.87 |
| s2 | In particular, strong evidence is presented that Wheeler-DeWitt quantization is not equivalent to reduced phase space quantization. | result 0.98 | 0.85 | 0.83 | asserted 0.52 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
In contrast to other approaches to (2+1)-dimensional quantum gravity, the Wheeler-DeWitt equation appears to be too complicated to solve explicitly, even for simple spacetime topologies. Nevertheless, it is possible to obtain a good deal of information about solutions and their interpretation. In particular, strong evidence is presented that Wheeler-DeWitt quantization is not equivalent to reduced phase space quantization.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
8 arXiv papers cite this in 8 sentences
Papers whose main result relates to this one's
States a conflicting result 1 paper
-
This result demonstrates that all seemingly distinct quantum theories arising from different quantization schemes of the same classical model are fundamentally equivalent.
The exact Wheeler-DeWitt equation for the scale-factor minisuperspace model · 0.84
Papers citing it · 4 sentences without a confident label
Cites it as background 4 papers
-
The Wheeler–DeWitt equation ([ref]) has been studied intensively since 30 years [ref] .
Bosonic Quantum Gravity According to the Global One-Dimensionality Conjecture · Introduction: Unsolved Quantum Gravity · 0.95
-
Classical and quantum solutions in this dimension have been widely investigated, for instance, in [ref] .
Classical and quantum (2+1)-dimensional spatially homogeneous string cosmology · General considerations · 0.95
-
Classical and quantum solutions for gravity theories in this dimension have been widely investigated, for instance, in [ref] .
Regular $(2+1)$-dimensional spatially homogeneous $\alpha'$-corrected BTZ-like black hole in string theory · General considerations · 0.95
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.