REVIEW 2 cited by
Do We Understand Black Hole Entropy ?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
I review various proposals for the nature of black hole entropy and for the mechanism behind the operation of the generalized second law. I stress the merits of entanglement entropy {\tenit qua\/} black hole entropy, and point out that, from an operational viewpoint, entanglement entropy is perfectly finite. Problems with this identification such as the multispecies problem and the trivialization of the information puzzle are mentioned. This last leads me to associate black hole entropy rather with the multiplicity of density operators which describe a black hole according to exterior observers. I relate this identification to Sorkin's proof of the generalized second law. I discuss in some depth Frolov and Page's proof of the same law, finding it relevant only for scattering of microsystems by a black hole. Assuming that the law is generally valid I make evident the existence of the universal bound on entropy regardless of issues of acceleration buoyancy, and discuss the question of why macroscopic objects cannot emerge in the Hawking radiance.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Astrophysical Signature and Optical Appearance of Weyl--Corrected Einstein--Maxwell Black Holes
Weyl corrections to Einstein-Maxwell black holes alter thermodynamic stability, topological classification, photon shadows, and accretion disk luminosity, enabling constraints on the correction parameter from astrophy...
-
The Case For Black Hole Remnants: A Review
A review arguing that black hole remnants remain viable and that the species and entropy objections to them are not decisive, so remnants could resolve the information paradox.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.