Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Charged Dilaton Black Holes with Unusual Asymptotics

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 27 Feb 1995

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We present a new class of black hole solutions in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton gravity in $n \ge 4$ dimensions.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDgr-qc/9502042 (version 1)
Pith ID5MDJHMI2, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJames H. Horne, Kevin C.K. Chan, Robert B. Mann. "Charged Dilaton Black Holes with Unusual Asymptotics." arXiv:gr-qc/9502042 (1995). https://pith.science/paper/5MDJHMI2
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,480 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.11 · states limitation 0.30 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.31 · compares with prior results 0.28 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present a new class of black hole solutions in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton gravity in $n \ge 4$ dimensions. These solutions have regular horizons and a singularity only at the origin. Their asymptotic behavior is neither asymptotically flat nor (anti-) de Sitter. Similar solutions exist for certain Liouville-type potentials for the dilaton.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present a new class of black hole solutions in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton gravity in $n \ge 4$ dimensions. contribution 1.00 0.95 0.48 asserted 1.00
s1 These solutions have regular horizons and a singularity only at the origin. result 0.91 0.82 0.13 asserted 1.00
s2 Their asymptotic behavior is neither asymptotically flat nor (anti-) de Sitter. result 0.91 0.84 0.45 asserted 1.00
s3 Similar solutions exist for certain Liouville-type potentials for the dilaton. result 0.73 0.51 0.08 asserted 0.93

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present a new class of black hole solutions in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton gravity in $n \ge 4$ dimensions. These solutions have regular horizons and a singularity only at the origin. Their asymptotic behavior is neither asymptotically flat nor (anti-) de Sitter. Similar solutions exist for certain Liouville-type potentials for the dilaton.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

24 arXiv papers cite this in 53 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 34 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 3 papers
Uses its method or tool 4 papers
Compares with it 4 papers
Cites it as background 7 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.