Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Quantum Space-time and Classical Gravity

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 24 Jul 1996

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Perturbations of this calculus are shown to give rise to non-trivial gravitational fields.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDgr-qc/9607060 (version 1)
Pith IDCA4TFMKT, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJ. Madore, J. Mourad. "Quantum Space-time and Classical Gravity." arXiv:gr-qc/9607060 (1996). https://pith.science/paper/CA4TFMKT
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,470 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.17 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.16 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

A method has been recently proposed for defining an arbitrary number of differential calculi over a given noncommutative associative algebra. As an example a version of quantized space-time is considered here. It is found that there is a natural differential calculus using which the space-time is necessarily flat Minkowski space-time. Perturbations of this calculus are shown to give rise to non-trivial gravitational fields.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 A method has been recently proposed for defining an arbitrary number of differential calculi over a given noncommutative associative algebra. background 0.96 0.07 0.04 asserted 0.99
s1 As an example a version of quantized space-time is considered here. contribution 0.61 0.54 0.03 asserted 0.80
s2 It is found that there is a natural differential calculus using which the space-time is necessarily flat Minkowski space-time. result 1.00 0.88 0.46 asserted 1.00
s3 Perturbations of this calculus are shown to give rise to non-trivial gravitational fields. result 0.99 0.87 0.51 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.83 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

A method has been recently proposed for defining an arbitrary number of differential calculi over a given noncommutative associative algebra. As an example a version of quantized space-time is considered here. It is found that there is a natural differential calculus using which the space-time is necessarily flat Minkowski space-time. Perturbations of this calculus are shown to give rise to non-trivial gravitational fields.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

5 arXiv papers cite this in 7 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.