Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Currents and Superpotentials in classical gauge invariant theories I. Local results with applications to Perfect Fluids and General Relativity

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 10 Apr 1998

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Bulk charges are replaced by fluxes of superpotentials.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDgr-qc/9804029 (version 2)
Pith IDI7JXF46F, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationB. Julia, S. Silva (ENS Paris). "Currents and Superpotentials in classical gauge invariant theories I. Local results with applications to Perfect Fluids and General Relativity." arXiv:gr-qc/9804029 (1998). https://pith.science/paper/I7JXF46F
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,733 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.18 · states limitation 0.20 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.75 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

E. Noether's general analysis of conservation laws has to be completed in a Lagrangian theory with local gauge invariance. Bulk charges are replaced by fluxes of superpotentials. Gauge invariant bulk charges may subsist when distinguished one-dimensional subgroups are present. As a first illustration we propose a new {\it Affine action} that reduces to General Relativity upon gauge fixing the dilatation (Weyl 1918 like) part of the connection and elimination of auxiliary fields. It allows a comparison of most gravity superpotentials and we discuss their selection by the choice of boundary conditions. A second and independent application is a geometrical reinterpretation of the convection of vorticity in barotropic nonviscous fluids. We identify the one-dimensional subgroups responsible for the bulk charges and thus propose an impulsive forcing for creating or destroying selectively helicity. This is an example of a new and general Forcing Rule.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 E. background 0.60 0.04 0.01 unclear 1.00
s1 Noether's general analysis of conservation laws has to be completed in a Lagrangian theory with local gauge invariance. gap 0.73 0.20 0.19 asserted 1.00
s2 Bulk charges are replaced by fluxes of superpotentials. result 0.79 0.52 0.34 asserted 1.00
s3 Gauge invariant bulk charges may subsist when distinguished one-dimensional subgroups are present. result 0.93 0.56 0.19 hedged possibility 1.00
s4 As a first illustration we propose a new {\it Affine action} that reduces to General Relativity upon gauge fixing the dilatation (Weyl 1918 like) part of the connection and elimination of auxiliary fields. contribution 0.97 0.89 0.11 asserted 0.76
s5 It allows a comparison of most gravity superpotentials and we discuss their selection by the choice of boundary conditions. contribution 0.83 0.84 0.08 asserted 0.94
s6 A second and independent application is a geometrical reinterpretation of the convection of vorticity in barotropic nonviscous fluids. contribution 0.93 0.86 0.07 asserted 0.99
s7 We identify the one-dimensional subgroups responsible for the bulk charges and thus propose an impulsive forcing for creating or destroying selectively helicity. contribution 0.47 0.91 0.17 asserted 0.96
s8 This is an example of a new and general Forcing Rule. interpretation 0.45 0.71 0.14 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.92 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

E. Noether's general analysis of conservation laws has to be completed in a Lagrangian theory with local gauge invariance. Bulk charges are replaced by fluxes of superpotentials. Gauge invariant bulk charges may subsist when distinguished one-dimensional subgroups are present. As a first illustration we propose a new {\it Affine action} that reduces to General Relativity upon gauge fixing the dilatation (Weyl 1918 like) part of the connection and elimination of auxiliary fields. It allows a comparison of most gravity superpotentials and we discuss their selection by the choice of boundary conditions. A second and independent application is a geometrical reinterpretation of the convection of vorticity in barotropic nonviscous fluids. We identify the one-dimensional subgroups responsible for the bulk charges and thus propose an impulsive forcing for creating or destroying selectively helicity. This is an example of a new and general Forcing Rule.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

43 arXiv papers cite this in 71 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 48 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 2 papers
  • We think we can add to this result some new contributions, which will define the contents of our present paper: a) we provide with a new constructive derivation of the gauge symmetry, now obtained by using the Rosenfeld-Dirac-Bergmann (RDB) approach to gauge theories (constrained systems); b) we show that in the case of pure gravity the presence of this gauge symmetry imposes that the only connection that can be present in an observable must be the Levi Civita connection; c) we extend the results of [ref] to the case with fermions and show that, from the Einstein-Palatini point of view, the Einstein-Cartan theory is the natural extension of GR with fermionic matter; and d) we prove that the usual procedure beginning with a torsion free connection in the EP formalism, or a connection with metricity in the VEP formalism, is a consistent truncation of the original setting and it amounts to

    On the equivalence of the Einstein-Hilbert and the Einstein-Palatini formulations of general relativity for an arbitrary connection · Introduction · 0.94

  • The discussion below is more or less trivial generalization of the argument about the boundary conditions proposed in [ref] .

    Noether currents in theories with higher derivatives and theories with differential field transformation in action (DFTA) · Conserved charges · 0.82

Uses its method or tool 6 papers
Compares with it 2 papers
Cites it as background 11 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.