RECORD
The Quantum Interest Conjecture
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 26 Jan 1999
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim In the present paper we prove the conjecture for massless quantized scalar fields in two and four-dimensional flat spacetime, and show that it is implied by the quantum inequalities.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Although quantum field theory allows local negative energy densities and fluxes, it also places severe restrictions upon the magnitude and extent of the negative energy. The restrictions take the form of quantum inequalities. These inequalities imply that a pulse of negative energy must not only be followed by a compensating pulse of positive energy, but that the temporal separation between the pulses is inversely proportional to their amplitude. In an earlier paper we conjectured that there is a further constraint upon a negative and positive energy delta-function pulse pair. This conjecture (the quantum interest conjecture) states that a positive energy pulse must overcompensate the negative energy pulse by an amount which is a monotonically increasing function of the pulse separation. In the present paper we prove the conjecture for massless quantized scalar fields in two and four-dimensional flat spacetime, and show that it is implied by the quantum inequalities.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Although quantum field theory allows local negative energy densities and fluxes, it also places severe restrictions upon the magnitude and extent of the negative energy. | background 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.03 | asserted 0.98 |
| s1 | The restrictions take the form of quantum inequalities. | background 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | These inequalities imply that a pulse of negative energy must not only be followed by a compensating pulse of positive energy, but that the temporal separation between the pulses is inversely proportional to their amplitude. | background 0.97 | 0.13 | 0.05 | asserted 0.99 |
| s3 | In an earlier paper we conjectured that there is a further constraint upon a negative and positive energy delta-function pulse pair. | background 0.86 | 0.56 | 0.04 | speculative 0.78 |
| s4 | This conjecture (the quantum interest conjecture) states that a positive energy pulse must overcompensate the negative energy pulse by an amount which is a monotonically increasing function of the pulse separation. | background 0.74 | 0.28 | 0.20 | asserted 0.64 |
| s5 | In the present paper we prove the conjecture for massless quantized scalar fields in two and four-dimensional flat spacetime, and show that it is implied by the quantum inequalities. | result 0.53 | 0.96 | 0.95 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Although quantum field theory allows local negative energy densities and fluxes, it also places severe restrictions upon the magnitude and extent of the negative energy. The restrictions take the form of quantum inequalities. These inequalities imply that a pulse of negative energy must not only be followed by a compensating pulse of positive energy, but that the temporal separation between the pulses is inversely proportional to their amplitude. In an earlier paper we conjectured that there is a further constraint upon a negative and positive energy delta-function pulse pair. This conjecture (the quantum interest conjecture) states that a positive energy pulse must overcompensate the negative energy pulse by an amount which is a monotonically increasing function of the pulse separation. In the present paper we prove the conjecture for massless quantized scalar fields in two and four-dimensional flat spacetime, and show that it is implied by the quantum inequalities.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
27 arXiv papers cite this in 38 sentences
Papers citing it · 26 sentences without a confident label
Compares with it 2 papers
-
This bound is also similar in flavor to the so-called quantum inequalities that have been proposed by Ford & Roman for theories without gravity [ref] .
Upper and Lower Bounds on the Integrated Null Energy in Gravity · Introduction and Summary · 0.97
-
These integral variants of the NEC are also qualitatively very different from the standard averaged null energy condition (ANEC), see for instance [ref] , or the Ford–Roman quantum inequalities [ref] , or their variants [ref] , or even the recent non-linear energy conditions explored in [ref] .
Clausius entropy for arbitrary bifurcate null surfaces · Generalized second law · 0.92
Cites it as background 10 papers
-
According to [ref] , the quantum interest conjecture states that an energy loan, namely the negative energy, must always be repaid by the positive energy, with an interest which is determined by the magnitude and duration of the loan.
A Holographic Description of Negative Energy States · Introduction · 0.95
-
In [ref] , ANEC-type inequalities were initially proposed to hold for two and four-dimensional, free, massless quantized scalar fields.
A Holographic Dual of the Quantum Inequalities · Introduction and Summary · 0.97
-
The role of squeezed states (originally studied in the context of quantum optics [ref] ) in realizing negative energy densities in quantum field theory is well known [ref] .
Semi-local Bounds on Null Energy in QFT · A series of squeezed states · 0.92
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.