Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Detection of gravitational waves using a network of detectors

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 16 Jun 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The overall sensitivity of the network is shown to increase roughly as the square-root of the number of detectors in the network.

how it is stated · asserted 0.96 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDgr-qc/9906064 (version 1)
Pith IDRFS343AN, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationArchana Pai (Inter-University Centre for Astronomy, Astrophysics, India), Pune, Sanjeev V. Dhurandhar, Sukanta Bose. "Detection of gravitational waves using a network of detectors." arXiv:gr-qc/9906064 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/RFS343AN
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,180 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.52 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.88 · compares with prior results 0.09 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We formulate the data analysis problem for the detection of the Newtonian coalescing-binary signal by a network of laser interferometric gravitational wave detectors that have arbitrary orientations, but are located at the same site. We use the maximum likelihood method for optimizing the detection problem. We show that for networks comprising of up to three detectors, the optimal statistic is essentially the magnitude of the network correlation vector constructed from the matched network-filter. Alternatively, it is simply a linear combination of the signal-to-noise ratios of the individual detectors. This statistic, therefore, can be interpreted as the signal-to-noise ratio of the network. The overall sensitivity of the network is shown to increase roughly as the square-root of the number of detectors in the network. We further show that these results continue to hold even for the restricted post-Newtonian filters. Finally, our formalism is general enough to be extended to address the problem of detection of such waves from other sources by some other types of detectors, e.g., bars or spheres, or even by networks of spatially well-separated detectors.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We formulate the data analysis problem for the detection of the Newtonian coalescing-binary signal by a network of laser interferometric gravitational wave detectors that have arbitrary orientations, but are located at the same site. contribution 0.78 0.85 0.05 asserted 0.91
s1 We use the maximum likelihood method for optimizing the detection problem. method 0.99 0.86 0.03 asserted 0.97
s2 We show that for networks comprising of up to three detectors, the optimal statistic is essentially the magnitude of the network correlation vector constructed from the matched network-filter. result 0.99 0.94 0.37 asserted 1.00
s3 Alternatively, it is simply a linear combination of the signal-to-noise ratios of the individual detectors. result 0.69 0.80 0.09 asserted 0.92
s4 This statistic, therefore, can be interpreted as the signal-to-noise ratio of the network. interpretation 1.00 0.80 0.16 asserted 0.98
s5 The overall sensitivity of the network is shown to increase roughly as the square-root of the number of detectors in the network. result 1.00 0.92 0.28 asserted 0.96
s6 We further show that these results continue to hold even for the restricted post-Newtonian filters. result 0.95 0.92 0.07 asserted 1.00
s7 Finally, our formalism is general enough to be extended to address the problem of detection of such waves from other sources by some other types of detectors, e.g., bars or spheres, or even by networks of spatially well-separated detectors. future work 0.84 0.55 0.10 asserted 0.74

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.88 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We formulate the data analysis problem for the detection of the Newtonian coalescing-binary signal by a network of laser interferometric gravitational wave detectors that have arbitrary orientations, but are located at the same site. We use the maximum likelihood method for optimizing the detection problem. We show that for networks comprising of up to three detectors, the optimal statistic is essentially the magnitude of the network correlation vector constructed from the matched network-filter. Alternatively, it is simply a linear combination of the signal-to-noise ratios of the individual detectors. This statistic, therefore, can be interpreted as the signal-to-noise ratio of the network. The overall sensitivity of the network is shown to increase roughly as the square-root of the number of detectors in the network. We further show that these results continue to hold even for the restricted post-Newtonian filters. Finally, our formalism is general enough to be extended to address the problem of detection of such waves from other sources by some other types of detectors, e.g., bars or spheres, or even by networks of spatially well-separated detectors.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.