REVIEW
Anderson et al. Reply (to the Comment by Katz on Pioneer 10/11)
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Anderson et al. Reply (to the Comment by Katz on Pioneer 10/11)
classification
gr-qc
astro-ph
keywords
heatkatzpioneerandersonanisotropicanomalyantennaeback
read the original abstract
We conclude that Katz's proposal (anisotropic heat reflection off of the back of the spacecraft high-gain antennae, the heat coming from the RTGs) does not provide enough power and so can not explain the Pioneer anomaly.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.