Anderson et al. Reply (to the Comment by Murphy on Pioneer 10/11)

Anthony S. Liu; Eunice L. Lau; John D. Anderson; Michael Martin Nieto; Philip A. Laing; Slava G. Turyshev

REVIEW

Anderson et al. Reply (to the Comment by Murphy on Pioneer 10/11)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv gr-qc/9906113 v1 pith:I2NA3WS3 submitted 1999-06-29 gr-qc astro-ph

Anderson et al. Reply (to the Comment by Murphy on Pioneer 10/11)

John D. Anderson , Philip A. Laing , Eunice L. Lau , Anthony S. Liu , Michael Martin Nieto , Slava G. Turyshev This is my paper

classification gr-qc astro-ph

keywords murphypioneeraccelerationandersonanomalouscommentconcludecraft

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

0 comments

read the original abstract

We conclude that Murphy's proposal (radiation of the power of the main-bus electrical systems from the rear of the craft) can not explain the anomalous Pioneer acceleration.

Anderson et al. Reply (to the Comment by Murphy on Pioneer 10/11)

discussion (0)