Pith. Sign in

RECORD

New approach for calculating heavy-to-light form factors with QCD sum rules on the light-cone

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Stefan Weinzierl, Oleg Yakovlev

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 27 Jul 2000

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We suggest a new approach for calculating heavy-to-light form factors.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.71 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0007317 (version 1)
Pith IDDNV3BIZZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationOleg Yakovlev, Stefan Weinzierl. "New approach for calculating heavy-to-light form factors with QCD sum rules on the light-cone." arXiv:hep-ph/0007317 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/DNV3BIZZ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,481 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.09 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.15 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We suggest a new approach for calculating heavy-to-light form factors. The method is based on light cone sum rules (LCSR) and covers the whole kinematical range of momentum transfer. The derivation of the new sum rule uses a suitable combination of double and single dispersion integrals. As an example we give numerical results for the form factor f^+ for the B -> pion transition.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We suggest a new approach for calculating heavy-to-light form factors. contribution 1.00 0.83 0.34 hedged possibility 0.71
s1 The method is based on light cone sum rules (LCSR) and covers the whole kinematical range of momentum transfer. method 0.85 0.72 0.19 asserted 1.00
s2 The derivation of the new sum rule uses a suitable combination of double and single dispersion integrals. method 0.99 0.91 0.07 asserted 1.00
s3 As an example we give numerical results for the form factor f^+ for the B -> pion transition. result 0.93 0.94 0.14 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.85.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We suggest a new approach for calculating heavy-to-light form factors. The method is based on light cone sum rules (LCSR) and covers the whole kinematical range of momentum transfer. The derivation of the new sum rule uses a suitable combination of double and single dispersion integrals. As an example we give numerical results for the form factor f^+ for the B -> pion transition.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.