Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Power corrections to the process $\gamma\gamma^*\to \pi\pi$ in the Light-Cone Sum Rules approach

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 16 Aug 2000

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We found that above $Q^2 \sim 4$ GeV$^2$ power corrections are numerically small and the twist-2 part dominates.The amplitude can be reliably calculated in this region using models of $2 \pi$ distribution amplitudes as an input.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0008168 (version 1)
Pith IDFLCZWGCD, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationL. Mankiewicz, N. Kivel. "Power corrections to the process $\gamma\gamma^*\to \pi\pi$ in the Light-Cone Sum Rules approach." arXiv:hep-ph/0008168 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/FLCZWGCD
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,020 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.78 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.90 · compares with prior results 0.11 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We applied QCD Light Cone Sum Rules to estimate power corrections to the helicity-conserving amplitude in the process $\gamma^*\gamma\to \pi\pi$. We found that above $Q^2 \sim 4$ GeV$^2$ power corrections are numerically small and the twist-2 part dominates.The amplitude can be reliably calculated in this region using models of $2 \pi$ distribution amplitudes as an input. We found that the magnitude of the NLO corrections depends rather strongly on the normalization of the gluonic distribution amplitude.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We applied QCD Light Cone Sum Rules to estimate power corrections to the helicity-conserving amplitude in the process $\gamma^*\gamma\to \pi\pi$. contribution 0.72 0.95 0.10 asserted 0.99
s1 We found that above $Q^2 \sim 4$ GeV$^2$ power corrections are numerically small and the twist-2 part dominates.The amplitude can be reliably calculated in this region using models of $2 \pi$ distribution amplitudes as an input. result 0.90 0.95 0.74 asserted 1.00
s2 We found that the magnitude of the NLO corrections depends rather strongly on the normalization of the gluonic distribution amplitude. result 0.99 0.90 0.09 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.95 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.74.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We applied QCD Light Cone Sum Rules to estimate power corrections to the helicity-conserving amplitude in the process $\gamma^*\gamma\to \pi\pi$. We found that above $Q^2 \sim 4$ GeV$^2$ power corrections are numerically small and the twist-2 part dominates.The amplitude can be reliably calculated in this region using models of $2 \pi$ distribution amplitudes as an input. We found that the magnitude of the NLO corrections depends rather strongly on the normalization of the gluonic distribution amplitude.

Human review
References

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.