RECORD
Zee model and Neutrinoless double beta decay
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 5 Mar 2002
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Based on the observed neutrino mass-square differences and mixings, we derive a few general patterns for the neutrino mass matrix in the flavor basis, which can correctly describe the atmospheric, solar, and $0\nu\beta\beta$ data.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The original Zee model can easily accommodate a bi-maximal mixing solution for the atmospheric and solar neutrino problems. From the most recent fit to the data we obtain a set of parameters for the Zee model. However, the recent claim on a positive signal observed in a neutrinoless double beta decay, which requires a nonzero $m_{ee}$, cannot be accounted for by the Zee model. Based on the observed neutrino mass-square differences and mixings, we derive a few general patterns for the neutrino mass matrix in the flavor basis, which can correctly describe the atmospheric, solar, and $0\nu\beta\beta$ data. Finally, we investigate a few possible extensions to the Zee model, which can give the required mass patterns.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The original Zee model can easily accommodate a bi-maximal mixing solution for the atmospheric and solar neutrino problems. | background 0.78 | 0.14 | 0.06 | hedged possibility 0.71 |
| s1 | From the most recent fit to the data we obtain a set of parameters for the Zee model. | result 0.47 | 0.80 | 0.04 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | However, the recent claim on a positive signal observed in a neutrinoless double beta decay, which requires a nonzero $m_{ee}$, cannot be accounted for by the Zee model. | result 0.41 | 0.15 | 0.34 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | Based on the observed neutrino mass-square differences and mixings, we derive a few general patterns for the neutrino mass matrix in the flavor basis, which can correctly describe the atmospheric, solar, and $0\nu\beta\beta$ data. | result 0.60 | 0.93 | 0.57 | asserted 0.95 |
| s4 | Finally, we investigate a few possible extensions to the Zee model, which can give the required mass patterns. | contribution 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.12 | hedged possibility 0.80 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The original Zee model can easily accommodate a bi-maximal mixing solution for the atmospheric and solar neutrino problems. From the most recent fit to the data we obtain a set of parameters for the Zee model. However, the recent claim on a positive signal observed in a neutrinoless double beta decay, which requires a nonzero $m_{ee}$, cannot be accounted for by the Zee model. Based on the observed neutrino mass-square differences and mixings, we derive a few general patterns for the neutrino mass matrix in the flavor basis, which can correctly describe the atmospheric, solar, and $0\nu\beta\beta$ data. Finally, we investigate a few possible extensions to the Zee model, which can give the required mass patterns.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence
Papers citing it
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
The model has been extensively studied in the literature [ref] , particularly in the Zee-Wolfenstein limit where only $ϕ_1$ couples to leptons due to a $ℤ_2$ symmetry [ref] .
The low-scale approach to neutrino masses · Zee Model · 0.86
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.