Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Dual coherent particle emission as generalised Cherenkov-like effect in high energy particle collisions

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 4 Sep 2002

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The general signatures of the DCPE in the nuclear and hadronic media are established and some experimental evidences are given.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0209039 (version 1)
Pith IDNGT7GEI3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationD.B. Ion, E.K. Sarkisyan. "Dual coherent particle emission as generalised Cherenkov-like effect in high energy particle collisions." arXiv:hep-ph/0209039 (2002). https://pith.science/paper/NGT7GEI3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,381 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.26 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.11 · compares with prior results 0.11 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this paper we introduce a new kind of nuclear/hadronic coherent particle production mechanism in high-energy collisions called \emph{dual coherent particle emission (DCPE)} which takes place when the phase velocities of the emitted particle v_{Mph} and that of particle source v_{B_1ph} satisfy the dual coherence condition: v_{Mph} <= v_{B_1ph}^-1. The general signatures of the DCPE in the nuclear and hadronic media are established and some experimental evidences are given.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this paper we introduce a new kind of nuclear/hadronic coherent particle production mechanism in high-energy collisions called \emph{dual coherent particle emission (DCPE)} which takes place when the phase velocities of the emitted particle v_{Mph} and that of particle source v_{B_1ph} satisfy the dual coherence condition: v_{Mph} <= v_{B_1ph}^-1. contribution 1.00 0.80 0.34 asserted 1.00
s1 The general signatures of the DCPE in the nuclear and hadronic media are established and some experimental evidences are given. contribution 0.58 0.87 0.23 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.87 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.54.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this paper we introduce a new kind of nuclear/hadronic coherent particle production mechanism in high-energy collisions called \emph{dual coherent particle emission (DCPE)} which takes place when the phase velocities of the emitted particle v_{Mph} and that of particle source v_{B_1ph} satisfy the dual coherence condition: v_{Mph} <= v_{B_1ph}^-1. The general signatures of the DCPE in the nuclear and hadronic media are established and some experimental evidences are given.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.