Limits of Confinement: The First 15 Years of Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Studies

H. Satz (U. of Bielefeld)

RECORD

Limits of Confinement: The First 15 Years of Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Studies

H. Satz (U. of Bielefeld)

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 17 Sep 2002

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim I recall what we had expected to find when the SPS and AGS programs were started, summarize what actually was found, and then try to assess what we have learned from the results.

how it is stated · unclear 0.48 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-ph/0209181 (version 2)

Pith IDDMQLCCY3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationH. Satz (U. of Bielefeld). "Limits of Confinement: The First 15 Years of Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Studies." arXiv:hep-ph/0209181 (2002). https://pith.science/paper/DMQLCCY3

Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,313 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.48 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

The study of high energy nuclear collisions has entered a new stage with RHIC; it therefore seems a good time to ask what we have learned from the experimental results obtained up to now. I recall what we had expected to find when the SPS and AGS programs were started, summarize what actually was found, and then try to assess what we have learned from the results.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	The study of high energy nuclear collisions has entered a new stage with RHIC; it therefore seems a good time to ask what we have learned from the experimental results obtained up to now.	background 0.97	0.06	0.05	asserted 0.79
s1	I recall what we had expected to find when the SPS and AGS programs were started, summarize what actually was found, and then try to assess what we have learned from the results.	contribution 0.75	0.27	0.05	unclear 0.48

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 1.00 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.81.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper

Original abstract

The study of high energy nuclear collisions has entered a new stage with RHIC; it therefore seems a good time to ask what we have learned from the experimental results obtained up to now. I recall what we had expected to find when the SPS and AGS programs were started, summarize what actually was found, and then try to assess what we have learned from the results.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.