RECORD
Subtraction terms for one-loop amplitudes with one unresolved parton
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 25 Jun 2003
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim In this paper I give all subtraction terms for electron-positron annihilation associated with one-loop amplitudes with one unresolved parton.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Fully differential next-to-next-to-leading order calculations require a method to cancel infrared singularities. In a previous publication, I discussed the general setup for the subtraction method at NNLO. In this paper I give all subtraction terms for electron-positron annihilation associated with one-loop amplitudes with one unresolved parton. These subtraction terms are integrated within dimensional regularization over the unresolved one-particle phase space. The results can be used with all variants of dimensional regularization (conventional dimensional regularization, the 't Hooft-Veltman scheme and the four-dimensional scheme).
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Fully differential next-to-next-to-leading order calculations require a method to cancel infrared singularities. | background 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.04 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | In a previous publication, I discussed the general setup for the subtraction method at NNLO. | background 1.00 | 0.38 | 0.02 | asserted 0.99 |
| s2 | In this paper I give all subtraction terms for electron-positron annihilation associated with one-loop amplitudes with one unresolved parton. | contribution 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.77 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | These subtraction terms are integrated within dimensional regularization over the unresolved one-particle phase space. | method 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.10 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | The results can be used with all variants of dimensional regularization (conventional dimensional regularization, the 't Hooft-Veltman scheme and the four-dimensional scheme). | interpretation 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.11 | asserted 0.74 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Fully differential next-to-next-to-leading order calculations require a method to cancel infrared singularities. In a previous publication, I discussed the general setup for the subtraction method at NNLO. In this paper I give all subtraction terms for electron-positron annihilation associated with one-loop amplitudes with one unresolved parton. These subtraction terms are integrated within dimensional regularization over the unresolved one-particle phase space. The results can be used with all variants of dimensional regularization (conventional dimensional regularization, the 't Hooft-Veltman scheme and the four-dimensional scheme).
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
12 arXiv papers cite this in 13 sentences
Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label
Cites it as background 10 papers
-
The factorisation properties of colour-ordered amplitudes in their soft and collinear limits has been extensively studied in [ref] .
NNLO QCD subtraction for top-antitop production in the $q\bar{q}$ channel · Single unresolved factors at one-loop · 0.97
-
In recent years a lot of effort has been devoted to the extension of the subtraction method to the computation of radiative corrections at the NNLO accuracy [ref] .
Subtraction with hadronic initial states at NLO: an NNLO-compatible scheme · Introduction · 0.97
-
In recent years, severe efforts have been made to extend the subtraction method to NNLO accuracy [ref] , and this has proved to be a challenging problem.
NNLO jet cross sections by subtraction · Introduction · 0.91
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.