RECORD
Some Comments on the Putative $\Theta^ +$ (1543) Exotic State
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 29 Jul 2003
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim The smallness of the effect seen in $K^+d$ with the $\delta \sigma $ fluctuations being less than 4 mb imply an indirect bound $\Gamma_{\Theta^+} < 6$ MeV, far stronger than the direct gamma-d measurements.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We point out that existing $K^+d$ scattering data available in the PDG (Particle Data Group compilation) suggest some fluctuations in those momentum bins where the (Fermi motion broadened) $\Theta^+$[1543] resonance recently indicated in many gamma nuclear reactions and predicted six years ago by Diakonv Petrov and Polyakov might have shown up. The I=0, $J^P={1/2}^+$ P-wave channel should have a universal peak cross section of $\sim 37$ mb at resonance. The smallness of the effect seen in $K^+d$ with the $\delta \sigma $ fluctuations being less than 4 mb imply an indirect bound $\Gamma_{\Theta^+} < 6$ MeV, far stronger than the direct gamma-d measurements. This renders the theoretical interpretation of the new state very difficult.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We point out that existing $K^+d$ scattering data available in the PDG (Particle Data Group compilation) suggest some fluctuations in those momentum bins where the (Fermi motion broadened) $\Theta^+$[1543] resonance recently indicated in many gamma nuclear reactions and predicted six years ago by Diakonv Petrov and Polyakov might have shown up. | contribution 0.49 | 0.24 | 0.11 | hedged possibility 0.98 |
| s1 | The I=0, $J^P={1/2}^+$ P-wave channel should have a universal peak cross section of $\sim 37$ mb at resonance. | background 0.88 | 0.13 | 0.09 | asserted 0.95 |
| s2 | The smallness of the effect seen in $K^+d$ with the $\delta \sigma $ fluctuations being less than 4 mb imply an indirect bound $\Gamma_{\Theta^+} < 6$ MeV, far stronger than the direct gamma-d measurements. | result 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.59 | asserted 0.97 |
| s3 | This renders the theoretical interpretation of the new state very difficult. | interpretation 1.00 | 0.26 | 0.37 | asserted 0.99 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We point out that existing $K^+d$ scattering data available in the PDG (Particle Data Group compilation) suggest some fluctuations in those momentum bins where the (Fermi motion broadened) $\Theta^+$[1543] resonance recently indicated in many gamma nuclear reactions and predicted six years ago by Diakonv Petrov and Polyakov might have shown up. The I=0, $J^P={1/2}^+$ P-wave channel should have a universal peak cross section of $\sim 37$ mb at resonance. The smallness of the effect seen in $K^+d$ with the $\delta \sigma $ fluctuations being less than 4 mb imply an indirect bound $\Gamma_{\Theta^+} < 6$ MeV, far stronger than the direct gamma-d measurements. This renders the theoretical interpretation of the new state very difficult.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
3 arXiv papers cite this in 4 sentences
Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
The diquark model has been proposed to explain the formation of compact multiquark states [ref] .
Large-$N_c$ QCD and tetraquarks · Multiquark states in QCD · 0.93
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.